Average Rating: 6.8/10
Reviews Counted: 73
Fresh: 59 | Rotten: 14
It is scarier and funnier than the original.
Average Rating: 7.4/10
Critic Reviews: 18
Fresh: 17 | Rotten: 1
It is scarier and funnier than the original.
liked it
Average Rating: 2.9/5
User Ratings: 384,145
A year after the monstrous success of 1996's neo-slasher flick Scream, director Wes Craven and screenwriter Kevin Williamson reunited for this follow-up. Since viewers last saw the characters, nosy newswoman Gale Weathers has written a sleazy best-selling book based on the events of the first film, a book that has been adapted into a Hollywood film called Stab, starring Tori Spelling as Sydney Prescott. The real Sydney (Neve Campbell) has since gone away to college in Cincinnati in hopes of
Dec 12, 1997 Wide
Jul 17, 2001
Miramax Films
All Critics (73) | Top Critics (18) | Fresh (61) | Rotten (14) | DVD (13)
The rest of the cast of disposable archetypes deadpanned about why ''sequels suck'' -- a particularly funny joke, since this one didn't.
Visceral, witty and appropriately redundant...
If you liked Scream there's no reason you shouldn't like this sequel.
Most intelligent movie of the moment.
Wes Craven was born to direct this material. One of the most successful of horror filmmakers.
Scream 2 is an ingenious, often hilarious, movie that does nothing to diminish the well-deserved cult reputation of its director.
Its self-awareness has a brashness that can be enlivening.
The first 10 minutes attain a deranged brilliance (especially considering Charlie Kaufman wouldn't introduce his own brand of narrative invention for another two years).
...a perfunctory (yet consistently watchable) sequel...
Bloody good fun.
A bland limp sequel that fails to follow the act of the charismatic first film...
Slightly milder sequel to the post-modern slasher.
There's a lot more going on here than in Scream... So why isn't it a slam dunk? Because of the writing, which is just lousy in any number of ways.
The weakest entry in the trilogy, but it's still smarter than the majority of horror films that get released each year.
Clever parody of the sequel trend; once again we are treated to a movie mocking its own conventions. Some great comic -- and terrifying -- moments, but suffers for not being as original as the original.
This disappointing sequel to last year's horror sleeper gets trapped in the clichés it's trying to send up.
Scream 2 is as clever and nerve-wracking as the original; on its own self-referential, crowd-pleasing terms, it's a success.
The film itself is stuck in a cycle of repetition, with slight variations.
Scream 2 isn't nearly as fresh, suspenseful or witty as it's inaugural bloodfest.
The secret to both Scream and Scream 2's success is that neither film condescends to its audience - instead the audience is let in on the joke.
At least as good as the original.
I truly hope that Scream 2 proves to all of the doubters that horror movies are not all the same. They are not all equally bad, and by God, they are not all equally good. However, they don't get any better than Scream 2.
Randy: There are certain rules that one must abide by in order to create a successful sequel. Number one: the body count is always bigger. Number two: the death scenes are always much more elaborate - more blood, more gore - carnage candy.And number three: never, ever, under any circumstances, assume the killer is
May 6, 2011
Super Reviewer
This sequel to the popular Scream movie the previous year, is just about as much fun as the first. I really enjoyed it.
September 6, 2010Super Reviewer
| 35% | The Hangover Part II |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 81% | Kung Fu Panda 2 |
| 44% | Cowboys & Aliens |
| 83% | Rise of the Planet of the Apes |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 88% | Lady and the Tramp |
| 69% | A Very Harold & Kumar Christmas |
| 21% | Fireflies in the Garden |
| 45% | The Rebound |
What are his 10 best movies ever?
See the all-new action-packed trailer!
Five new Marvelous pictures
Unconventional Superheroes