Critic Consensus: Slow-moving, cerebral, and ambiguous, Solaris is not a movie for everyone, but it offers intriguing issues to ponder.
Tickets & Showtimes
|Rating:||PG-13 (for sexuality/nudity, brief language and thematic elements)|
|Genre:||Drama, Romance, Mystery & Suspense, Science Fiction & Fantasy|
|Directed By:||Steven Soderbergh|
|Written By:||Stanislav Lem, Steven Soderbergh|
|In Theaters:||Nov 27, 2002 Wide|
|On DVD:||Jul 29, 2003|
Watch it now
as Chris Kelvin
as Mrs. Gibarian
as Friend No. 1
as Suited Professional ...
as Young Boy/Gibarian's...
as Suited Professional ...
as Friend No. 2
as Patient No. 1
as Patient No. 2
News & Interviews for Solaris
Critic Reviews for Solaris
Scripted, shot, directed and edited by Soderbergh with his customary intelligence and assurance, this is perhaps the most ambiguous and cerebrally sophisticated Hollywood movie in nearly three decades.
Solaris is just boring. It's dull. God, is it dull! Dull! Dull! Dull! Dull! Dull!
...it remains a fascinating work and its deep questioning of what makes us human when faced with simulacrums feels if anything more relevant today than when it was made.
Steven Soderbergh prunes Andrei Tartovsky?s 1972 film (based on Stanislaw Lem?s novel) to the clarity and concision of a great short story ? a forlorn, philosophical sci-fi romance treading the terrain of "Blade Runner?s" metaphysical melancholy.
A thought provoking, fascinating and heart breaking glimpse into characters that must come to grips with their past.
Audience Reviews for Solaris
This 2002 remake of Andrei Tarkovsky's Solaris manages to be far less ambitious and goes straight to the point. I thought it was a good take on the classic film, but it doesn't have the epic visuals and terrific, yet simple story that the original possessed. Of course, this film echoes what the 1976 film had, but it never goes in depth with its subject, and it doesn't do anything new or refreshing. With that being said, Watch the original film instead, it's far superior and it's a classic of the genre. This remake is good, but it never comes close to the original. The acting in this remake is very good, and I thought that overall it was a solid film, but it also rushed through the story a bit. With the original, it took its time to let the story unfold and it worked brilliantly and that's one of the main reasons that Tarkovsky's Sci Fi classic is so unique and ultimately memorable. With this remake, you get a far shorter film, one that doesn't reach its potential and in turn lacks the development that made the original so good. Nonetheless, this remake is good, but it could have been better as well. Luckily the cast are great, and it's the film's strongest asset. However, I would recommend the 1976 film instead of this one, but if you want a more stripped down version, with less ambitious ideas, then this remake is for you. In terms of revamping a classic film, Solaris like every other remake before or after it has left a bit to be desired, and makes you want to watch the original film. The ideas expressed on-screen, are things we've seen before, and there never is new blood injected into the story. For a remake however, it's quite good, but it's nothing compared to the film that came before it.
Incoherent, but looks good and is well acted
|Gibarian:||If you think that there is a solution, you'll die here.|
|Dr. Chris Kelvin:||And death shall have no dominion. Dead men naked they shall be one with the man in the wind and the west moon. When their bones are picked clean and the clean bones gone they shall have stars at elbow and foot. Though they go mad they shall be sane. Though they sink through the sea they shall rise again. Though lovers be lost love shall not. And death shall have no dominion.|
Discuss Solaris on our Movie forum!