Average Rating: 5.6/10
Reviews Counted: 89
Fresh: 47 | Rotten: 42
No consensus yet.
Average Rating: 5.7/10
Critic Reviews: 28
Fresh: 15 | Rotten: 13
No consensus yet.
Average Rating: 3.5/5
User Ratings: 8,853
Two stories set in two eras against the comical terrain of college and high school, past and present--exploring issues of sex, race, celebrity and exploitation. The first story: On a college campus in the mid-80s, a white female writing student has an emotional experience with her black, male writing teacher. The second story: In 2000, Toby Oxman is a 30-year-old wannabe celebrity and a documentary filmmaker. He sets out to document the Livingstons, an affluent suburban family raising three
Feb 8, 2002 Limited
Jul 16, 2002
Fine Line Features - Official Site
Mr. Gary Scott
Mary Lynn Rajskub
No Friends? Inconceivable! Log in to see what your friends have to say.
Despite [Solondz's] undeniable talent, however manipulative, his stories are too sour and mean-spirited for my taste.
That Storytelling has value cannot be denied. Not even Solondz's thirst for controversy, sketchy characters and immature provocations can fully succeed at cheapening it.
In his latest effort, Storytelling, Solondz has finally made a movie that isn't just offensive -- it also happens to be good.
Solondz is without doubt an artist of uncompromising vision, but that vision is beginning to feel, if not morally bankrupt, at least terribly monotonous.
A frustrating experience, made more so by the seemingly self-referential moments in the film.
While Solondz tries and tries hard, Storytelling fails to provide much more insight than the inside column of a torn book jacket.
Solondz has finally brought his critics into the frame, if only in an attempt to subject them to the same torture as everyone else.
The film is marked by the same darkly humorous sensibility of rest of Solondz's work, excpet that the novelty is gone and the acerbic vision is now contained in a fractured text marred by poor storytelling and shifting tone--it's not easy to shock anymore
In a scabrous follow-up to Happiness, Todd Solondz once again crafts a movie easier to admire than it is to like.
It's never less than interesting, that's for sure, but I didn't like it.
...a sensational self-expose, in which the director presents us with any number of characters that ... reflect and represent various aspects of Todd Solondz
Storytelling is a witty, dark, and strangely satisfying experiment. It's a little bit sad, a little bit sick, and a whole lot honest.
challenging and uncompromised, and Solondz makes his point and punches it home
This one plays as two separate pieces that may have been better if presented as stand-alone films in different formats.
The movie does such an excellent job of critiquing itself at every faltering half-step of its development that criticizing feels more like commiserating.
Solondz is so intent on hammering home his message that he forgets to make it entertaining.
Whether you consider him glib or perverse or really onto something, his m.o. makes for provocative movie storytelling.
This painfully arch and incredibly self-absorbed film -- which might best be described as a dark comedy -- displays nearly all of Solondz's worst and laziest filmmaking tendencies in one compact package.
Still pretentious and filled with subtext, but entertaining enough at 'face value' to recommend to anyone looking for something different.
Solondz is a courageous social commentator and a canny provocateur at the same time. He'll never get to Hollywood if he stays on this track, but cinema will be a lot duller if he ever mends his incendiary ways.
I am more offended by his lack of faith in his audience than by anything on display here.
Audience Reviews for Storytelling
- Mr. Gary Scott: I don't know about what happened, because once you start writing, it all becomes fiction.
Discuss Storytelling on our Movie forum!