Average Rating: 5.1/10
Reviews Counted: 49
Fresh: 21 | Rotten: 28
Though it suffered from toxic buzz at the time of its release, Waterworld is ultimately an ambitious misfire: an extravagant sci-fi flick with some decent moments and a lot of silly ones.
Average Rating: 6.5/10
Critic Reviews: 10
Fresh: 8 | Rotten: 2
Though it suffered from toxic buzz at the time of its release, Waterworld is ultimately an ambitious misfire: an extravagant sci-fi flick with some decent moments and a lot of silly ones.
liked it
Average Rating: 2.6/5
User Ratings: 208,328
Get your friends' movie recommendations by adding Rotten Tomatoes to your Facebook Timeline.
Widely considered to be an expensive failure, Waterworld was an epic vehicle for Kevin Costner, who starred in and co-produced the film, with his friend Kevin Reynolds as director. It was based on a 1986 screenplay by Peter Rader and cost an estimated $235 million, more than any film in history up to that time. Costner eventually fired Reynolds and directed the last few scenes himself. The story was filmed in Hawaii, using several artificial islands, and is set in an apocalyptic future, after
PG-13, 2 hr. 15 min.
Action & Adventure, Mystery & Suspense, Science Fiction & Fantasy
Jul 28, 1995 Wide
Nov 1, 1998
MCA Universal Home Video
All Critics (53) | Top Critics (12) | Fresh (22) | Rotten (28) | DVD (13)
It's a genuine vault at greatness that misses the mark -- but survives.
A moderately successful guy's movie with both weak and strong elements where lots of things are brilliantly blown up and few things make any kind of sense.
Waterworld is the movie that didn't happen. Which is a roundabout way of saying that the infamous Universal film is very good, damn good -- not great, mind you, but rousing and continually entertaining.
Waterworld isn't Fishtar, but Kevin Costner's pricey, post-apocalyptic sloshbuckler isn't a seafaring classic either.
In the tradition of the old Westerns and Mel Gibson's Road Warrior flicks, this film provides good escapist fun.
It's one of those marginal pictures you're not unhappy to have seen, but can't quite recommend.
Seagoing sci-fi swashbuckler fun despite bad reputation.
Regardless of faults, I embrace Waterworld as the pure matinee escapism it was intended to be, readily devouring the sci-fi excitement both Reynolds and Costner are happy to dish up.
While it is true that time, and the obsessive culture of the Internet, has lessened Waterworld's "Fishtar" reputation to some extent, this is still one massively flawed film.
actually pretty good
Waterworld drowned in bad buzz during its theatrical release. It deserves a better fate.
I had no idea what the characters were thinking half the time, but I had an excellent idea what they were feeling, physically.
Nowhere close to as bad as its reputation
Fame swelled Costner's head.
I think this movie got ragged far more than it needed to. Kevin Costner wasnt given a break at the time and the huge budget was just insane. But I enjoyed the movie.
March 20, 2007Super Reviewer
Excellent! Only took me 17 years to get around to it...
June 27, 2007Super Reviewer
| 29% | The Vow |
| 94% | Mission: Impossible Ghost Protoc... |
| 87% | The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo |
| 28% | Underworld Awakening |
| 85% | Chronicle |
| 65% | The Woman in Black |
| 25% | This Means War |
| 94% | The Secret World of Arrietty |
| 36% | Red Tails |
| 88% | Certified Copy (Copie Conforme) |
Red Tails, This Means War
Pictures: Wes Anderson films
Video: Your friendly four minute preview
Trailer: The legend continues!