Jack the Giant Slayer (2013)
Critic Consensus: It's enthusiastically acted and reasonably fun, but Jack the Giant Slayer is also overwhelmed by digital effects and a bland, impersonal story.
Jack the Giant Slayer Videos
Jack the Giant Slayer Photos
Watch it now
as King Brahmwell
as General Entin
as Old Maid
as Old Hamm
as Panto Erik the Great
as Panto Monk
as Small Drunk
as Fat Drunk
as King's Artiste
as Young Guardian
as General Fallon
as General Fallon's Small HEad
as Cook Giant
as Sentry/Bugler Giant
as Tongue Giant
as 1st Child
as 2nd Child
as Tour Guide
as Little Girl
as Master of Secrets
as Panto Giant 1
as Panto Giant 2
as Panto Musician
as Jack's Father
as Young Jack
as Young Isabelle
News & Interviews for Jack the Giant Slayer
Critic Reviews for Jack the Giant Slayer
Forget that Giant Slayer feels photocopied and is entirely unnecessary. It's just not exciting.
A mash-up of old-school heroism, pantomime villainy, starstruck lovers and post-'Shrek' archness, it's more exhausting than exhilarating.
It's fast, rousing, and blessedly brief - under two hours instead of, say, nine in three bladder-straining installments.
Unlike Peter Jackson with the overstuffed The Hobbit,[director Bryan]Singer shies away from the epic and settles for entertaining. Sometimes that's more than enough.
Not awful, not wonderful, Jack the Giant Slayer is a midrange fairy tale epic that's a lot more ho-hum than fee-fi-fo-fum.
Audience Reviews for Jack the Giant Slayer
'Fe-fi-fo-fum! I smell the blood of an Englishman' Yet another famous children's fairytale gets the big screen treatment but can you make a entire film out of a rather short and rather simple fable? The other question is which fable is this film supposedly based upon? Jack and the Beanstalk? or Jack the Giant Killer? Both are very different yet this film merges the two or so it seems. At the same time the films animated intro felt very much like a rip of the 'Hellboy 2' intro, whilst the entire plot about this magical crown felt like a rip off 'Lord of the Rings'. This whole idea felt very much like a one trick pony to me, that trick simply being the excuse to show huge CGI giants eating people and going on a rampage, and that's it. The rest of the film felt so utterly pointless it was almost laughable. Half the film seems to be based on the beanstalk fairytale with the second half based around the giant killer fable but at the same time neither are remotely accurate to the original sources. So why not just make a completely independent giant fantasy? Everything about this just felt like a misfire to me. The casting was poor, Nicholas Hoult is just a very average actor with a very odd haircut (what is going on with that parting?! had the same stupid cut for 'Warm Bodies'). Eleanor Tomlinson as the Princess was so very bland, not particularly attractive and not particularly useful in any way, whilst Ewan McGregor seemed to be doing his weak ass Jedi thing all over again. Only decent performance came from the ever reliable Tucci. Overall the characters weren't really developed much and there was a distinct lack of a really bad baddie. On top of that the effects weren't even that good! the giants looked exactly like what they were, big CGI giants. It looks like they're trying to make them appear realistic but not entirely, but they look awful. Especially the two headed giant leader with that shitty Gollum-like head, what the hell! giant fail there folks (see what I did there heh). Plus why are most of the giants Irish? am I missing something there? and why aren't there any female giants? how does this race keep going? am I being too picky? Even the beanstalk looked pretty naff frankly. The only thing that looked good was the CGI landscapes and the giant island in the sky, but as usual way too much reliance on CGI. There seemed to be many giant waterfalls going over the edge of the giant island, where exactly does all that water go?? Bottom line this just feels like a jump on that fairytale action flick bandwagon we have seen recently. All the usual big CGI battles, stunts, camera angles etc...the same recycled crud we've seen over and over again. Predictable as usual in that boring modern Hollywood cookie cutter fashion. The plot is thinner than a catwalk model after she's just stepped out of the toilet and to make matters worse the CGI effects are pretty terrible. So you can't even call this a sharp looking updated piece of crap, its just crap. Oh and the final twist at the end is useless. I mean really, is that suppose to be clever? gee...errr...genius. And while I'm at it, the films title is 'Jack the Giant Slayer', many giants get killed here but I believe Jack only kills one, so he doesn't slay much then.
Really entertaining and charming fairy tale adventure that only suffers from the massive use of CGI. Especially the giants would have worked much better as real actors filmed in forced perspective. That doesn't mean there is plenty to enjoy here, though.
It is what one would expect.
Jack the Giant Slayer Quotes
|Cook Giant:||Never get any good humans these days|
|Cook Giant:||Never get any good humans these days.|
|General Fallon:||I am now your king, now follow as I lead|
|General Fallon:||I am now your king, now follow as I lead.|
|Roderick:||Shuh. Can't you see i'm talking to giants now.|
|Young Jack:||Father? Could you read a bit of it for me please?|