The Jungle Book 2

Critics Consensus

This inferior rehash of The Jungle Book should have gone straight to video.

19%

TOMATOMETER

Reviews Counted: 91

29%
liked it

Audience Score

User Ratings: 21,720

TOMATOMETER

N/A
All Critics | Top Critics
Average Rating: N/A
Reviews Count: 0
Fresh: 0
Rotten: 0

AUDIENCE SCORE

29%
Average Rating: 2.9/5

You may have noticed some of the recent changes we have made. To read more about what we’ve been working on behind the scenes, please check out our new RT Product Blog here.


Want to See

Add Rating
My Rating    

The Jungle Book 2 Photos

Movie Info

Mowgli lives in his new man village, but he misses his pal Baloo who likewise pines for his man cub. Restless Mowgli decides to return to the free atmosphere of jungle life. He leaves behind his new girlfriend, Shanti, who's afraid of the dangerous wild animals Mowgli is used to roaming around with in the village. Once there, Mowgli's old nemesis, a tiger named Shere Khan, is out for revenge, and it's up to old friends like Baloo and others to help Mowgli avoid Kahn's lethal claws.

Watch it now

Cast

Critic Reviews for The Jungle Book 2

All Critics (91) | Top Critics (28)

  • Disney's sequel to the story of Mowgli and his jungle companions leaves out the name of Rudyard Kipling on the credits. No loss. It could well have left out the name of Disney.

    Jan 10, 2018 | Full Review…
  • John Goodman's Baloo admits, 'King Louie? He split!' Before the third defibrillation of 'Bare Necessities,' you and your kids might too.

    Feb 19, 2003 | Full Review…
  • More development and nuance in Karl Geurs' script would have made a big difference.

    Feb 18, 2003

    Todd McCarthy

    Variety
    Top Critic
  • Wait for it to come out on video, it'll baby sit a four-year-old. Anybody else is gonna be bored by it.

    Feb 18, 2003
  • That scratching sound you hear isn't Baloo the bear rubbing against a tree, it's Disney scraping the bottom of the sequel barrel with a follow-up that has none of the charm or creativity of the original.

    Feb 15, 2003 | Rating: 2/5
  • Relatively innocuous but utterly unnecessary -- except from the standpoint of unbridled capitalism.

    Feb 14, 2003 | Full Review…

Audience Reviews for The Jungle Book 2

½

Well, if there was going to be any way of stripping down the original classic to the bare bones, it is definitely the 2003 sequel "The Jungle Book 2." Picking up exactly where the original leaves off, we see Mowgli with his new family of humans, while he still misses his jungle life. As he is not allowed back there, he figures out a way, resetting the plot from it's predecessor. Singing "Bare Necessities," having Sheer Khan after him once again, and re-creating some of the iconic scenes from the original, I truly do not know what the studio was thinking. This would have worked as a dumb rehash for the Disney Channel, but it actually received a theatrical release. "The Jungle Book 2" is the exact definition of why some sequels do not ever need to be made. This was at the time when Pixar and Disney's Animated Studios were making great films, so the fact that this was widely released is baffling to me. When the film begins and the viewers spend time in this town right outside the jungle, it is interesting for about 10 minutes, which means those few minutes could have even been a Disney short to show what Mowgli was up to after the events of the original. The writers must have known it would feel like nothing it happening, so they pretty much placed his siblings in the same danger with him along the way, which was very annoying. This was a cheap ploy to make average moviegoers blind to the fact that it was an absolute rehash. If Mowgli returned to help save one of his friends from imminent danger or had lost one of his siblings in the jungle, that would have made for a much more interesting story. Honestly, any story would have been more original than this. If you had a checklist of story points from the first, I would say about 90% would be checked off again here. To add to that, the addition of John Goodman as Baloo should have been terrific, but when everyone else is fairly unknown while he is such a well-known actor, it became slightly distracting. In the end, there really is not much to say about this film, because it is the exact same as the first, even down to singing the same songs. I am not normally so harsh on films, but this is just a lazy Disney film that should not have been released. The animation is improved upon and the voice acting is much clearer, making for a cleaner film, but that is not really saying much, seeing as they waited almost 40 years to make this film. This is one of the most disappointing follow-ups that Disney has ever done (to a classic). I can never imagine myself recommending this film, even to fans of the first. So much wasted potential.

KJ Proulx
KJ Proulx

Super Reviewer

Although a nice conclusion for the characters, this is a very short and embarassing attempt at a sequel.

Bradley Wright
Bradley Wright

Super Reviewer

it totally not like the first film.

erika bruhns
erika bruhns

Super Reviewer

½

Perhaps I'm in the minority in thinking/saying this, but I think Disney rocks at making sequels to their all-time classics, and this is definitely one of the better ones! Familiar tunes abound, and it's a lot of fun to watch Mowgli being torn on whether he wants to go back to the jungle full time or stay with his fellow humans, and the ending couldn't have been better - nice solution to indecisiveness! A lot of reviewers said the voices are a lot different....if they hadn't said so, I wouldn't have known...sure can't tell!

Jason Owens
Jason Owens

Super Reviewer

The Jungle Book 2 Quotes

There are no approved quotes yet for this movie.

News & Features