The LEGO Movie 2: The Second Part
The Walking Dead
Log in with Facebook
Forgot your password?
Don't have an account? Sign up here
and the Terms and Policies,
and to receive email from Rotten Tomatoes and Fandango.
Already have an account? Log in here
Please enter your email address and we will email you a new password.
We want to hear what you have to say but need to verify your account. Just leave us a message here and we will work on getting you verified.
Please reference “Error Code 2121” when contacting customer service.
No consensus yet.
Tomatometer Not Available...
No consensus yet.
All Critics (18)
| Top Critics (3)
| Fresh (11)
| Rotten (7)
Surprises are few and far between, but what makes it a bit better than average compared to other live-action kids' films is the jaunty banter.
The pic's general good humor - plus the tony adult presence of Gillian Anderson and Ben Kingsley - compensates to some degree for its cheapjack construction, but not enough to extend its appeal far beyond pre-teens in Blighty.
It's brisk enough, and Wright's fondness for types sustains it: there are well-judged contributions from Ben Kingsley as a snippy collaborator, and Tamer Hassan as the guvnor of a pub in permanent lockdown.
Lively action on a low budget.
While Robot Overlords looks like it's been made on the budget of a Doctor Who episode and features binary acting, there is enough spirit to entertain.
Robot Overlords is an engaging action romp that moves at a nice pace but eventually gets rather let down by effects efforts that are compromised by the film's low-budget origins.
It combines exciting spectacle with heart.
Director Jon Wright, who directed the rambunctious monster-movie Grabbers, makes the most of his limited resources, imbuing the action with an oddly endearing sense of string-and-glue DIY youthfulness.
Robot Overlords would be better as a children's television series than a cinema release, despite the presence of Ben Kingsley and Gillian Anderson.
For a low-budget kids' movie, this British science-fiction adventure has an unusually sharp cast, decent effects and...
So much to love in this Brit kiddie sci-fi adventure, with its brilliant concept that really works on a small budget and a real sense of place.
Feels like an artefact from the Children's Film Foundation era, only with misplaced adult humour and bad language.
Gillian anderson coupled with some quirky humour is enough to make this somewhat lacking Scifi a tad more watchable. The acting doesn't do much to save the lacking plot.
This is a horrible film. I have no fucking idea how this has a 60% on Rotten Tomatoes. It goes to show you that even RT is full of shit sometimes.
Not a half bad movie. It's certainly better than, out of three Transformers films I've seen, two of them, arguably speaking. The problem with Michael Bay's Transformers, outside of the fact that they're terrible, is that they try to be too broad and the story literally makes no sense whatsoever because it is so full of pointless information. So it's nice to see a movie that, while still being silly and self-aware of its own silliness, finds a way to strip, pardon the pun, things down to a point where the film is mostly an allegory for Nazi occupation of France during World War 2. Of course, they disguised this with robots, but it's very clear that the humans being locked into their homes for fear the robots will kill them if they step out of their house is supposed to evoke that very strong image. Of course, the film isn't so much about that, but more about these kids being part of the resistance that wants to fight back the robot assholes that have taken over their planet. So in that regards, I think the movie works just fine and, honestly, it offers what Transformers always failed to deliver and that is child-like thrills. I mean that in the most complimentary way possible, of course. I don't even know how to explain it, but there's something about this that brings out your inner child in some regards, fighting with toy robots and shit. I thought that was cool. The effects, for that matter, aren't actually half-bad for a movie that cost, according to Wikipedia, $21 million to make. It's clear that this movie isn't District 9 or, even, Transformers in terms of special effects, but it's a movie that looks considerably better given its rather small budget. The story is meh, honestly. Nothing really special about it. It's this teen's search for his father so he, his family and his friends can find a way to fight back. Nothing special, but it gets the job done. Though, I will say, that the plot of the movie takes a turn, for the worst in my opinion, after a certain reveal that literally came out of nowhere without any actual build-up. Essentially, Sean, our hero, is somehow able to control the robots if they get close enough to him. It's about as unexpected and out of left field as is humanly possible, because it came during a chase scene when the robots were giving the kids the countdown to get back to their houses, Sean fell down at the last possible second and the robot stopped with him. He then figures out that he can control them if they get close enough. Just like that. I'm assuming the idea is that we're just as in the dark as Sean and the group are, but this is a plot device that changes absolutely everything. Before that point, no one had ever been able to control the robots and for them to just spring it on us, without ever giving us any explanation, and expecting us to just take it like that, feels a little insulting. It wouldn't be so much of an issue if it was like, I don't know, Sean found a cellphone when he previously didn't have one, but this is a big development in the plot and one that is absolutely essential for how the film is gonna end. I thought that was really fucking problematic and it's, easily, the film's biggest flaw. I can, honestly, see people giving up on the film after this, because it's unjustifiably not explained. It's like you're meant to ignore everything that came prior to that point, seriously, it's kinda stupid. I'm almost tempted to bump the film down to 2 stars instead of 2.5, but I don't think I'm gonna do it. Part of me, honestly, enjoyed the film's ironic silliness. The acting is fairly solid, Ben Kingsley, Gillian Anderson and Steven Mackintosh, even in an abbreviated role, are all good here. And the kids do a decent enough job themselves. The film is also really nicely shot, all things considered. So, even with the really big flaw in the film, I thought this was a decently enjoyable alternative to the awful Transformers film franchise. Might not have as much action, but it's considerably more enjoyable regardless. Though this is still only decent, at best. This is a Netflix watch, for sure.
This British Sci-Fi flick has the right amount of action adventure thrills and charms that comes from an independent film that in some way doesn't take itself too seriously. While it's just as inventive as 'Turbo Kid' it takes a more familiar present day inspire sci-fi scenario with a twist that includes enough admirable acting, special effects and inventive sequences adhering to narrative tropes and once again parodying narrative cliches.
There are no approved quotes yet for this movie.