King Arthur (2004)
King Arthur (2004)
King Arthur Trailers & Photos
|Rating:||PG-13 (for intense battle sequences, a scene of sensuality and some language)|
|Genre:||Drama, Action & Adventure|
|Directed By:||Antoine Fuqua|
|Written By:||David H. Franzoni, John Lee Hancock|
|In Theaters:||Jul 7, 2004 Wide|
|On DVD:||Dec 21, 2004|
Watch it now
as Bishop Germanius
as Marius Honorius
as British Scout
as Merlin's Lieutenant
as Mental Monk
as Obnoxious Monk
as Third Monk
as Cerdic Scout
as Cerdic Officer
as Cerdic Officer
as Bishop Decoy
as Woad Killed by Lance...
as Roman Commander
as Arthur's Mother
as Young Arthur
as Scottish Village Gir...
as Mangled Saxon
as Woad Advisor
as Cerdic Bodyguard
as Young Lancelot
as Lancelot's Father
as Lancelot's Mother
as Roman Officer
News & Interviews for King Arthur
Critic Reviews for King Arthur
The interminable battle scenes are limply choreographed and unexciting. This is one king that's best left alone.
Fuqua creates a very grim and stylish mood that fits what the concept is attempting to accomplish very well.
Guinevere, no dainty princess she, is a kind of hardened medieval feminist, and the aggressor to Arthur's bashful but equally driven warrior, in both bed and on the battlefield.
In many ways this movie tells us far more about the values and age in which we are living, than the one it pretends to be returning us to.
Audience Reviews for King Arthur
There's some blarney about "searching for historical fact" woven into the story but basically what you get is an old timey adventure/propaganda/nationalism piece about how ENGLAND! (always said in capital letters w/an exclamation in this film) rose from the ashes of nations to become A LAND OF FREE MEN! (They let some women come along with 'em, too.) Ehh.
Great war film! Bizarre history angle, but I loved it!
King Arthur is another mediocre action film by director Antoine Fuqua, who isn't that skilled as a director to begin with. I felt that the films action scenes were well done, but unfortunately that's about it going for it. The plot is under developed, and never really interesting. I think it's a great shame because King Arthur could have been quite an epic film, unfortunately, it isn't. Fuqua's direction is clumsy and unfocused, and the film suffers because of it. Under a different director, the film could have succeeded, but the film is a mediocre attempt at a historical epic, and the end result is a film that doesn't really make you satisfied. The casting choices for this film are very questionable as well. Aside from Sin City and Shoot Em' Up, I'm not a fan of Clive Owen, and in this film he's pretty bad. So is Keira Knightleey, who usually is a good choice for period pieces, but this isn't a period piece film that she should've starred in. Most of the cast are not right for the part, and Fuqua doesn't know how to craft an action epic, and the flaws are apparent on-screen. The film could have been much better; unfortunately the result is a film that is a badly acted and plot mess that will make you lose interest halfway through the end of the film. King Arthur could almost be seen as a guilty pleasure; however, I think the mediocrity of this film is too much for me to see it that way. I don't view King Arthur as an awful film, but almost. The film could have been much better with a better, much developed storyline and a better cast. Oh well, don't get overly excited before watching this film, you may end up disappointed, I was.
King Arthur Quotes
|Tristan:||You are free now.|
|Bishop Germanius:||We are all going to die someday. If it's death by a Saxonhand that frightens you, stay home!|
|Lancelot:||I don't believe in heaven. I've been living in this hell. But if you represent what heaven is, then take me there.|
|Artorious Castus:||Deeds in themselves are meaningless unless they're for some higher purpose.|
Discuss King Arthur on our Movie forum!