Dorian Gray (2009)
Critics Consensus: Despite a lavish and polished production, Dorian Gray is tame and uninspired with a lifeless performance by Ben Barnes in the title role.
No Top Critics Tomatometer score yet...
Dorian Gray is very handsome -- and very cursed. Young Dorian arrives fresh on the London social scene and is taken under the wing of Lord Henry Wotton who introduces him to the seedy pleasures of London life. When Dorian sees how incredible he looks in a newly painted picture of himself, he swears to do whatever it takes to look as young and handsome in real life as he does in the picture -- forever. His stunning good looks and charm soon attract the celebrity lifestyle and everything that it brings. Dorian finds himself slipping deeper and deeper into a world of sin, sex and celebrity, seemingly without any consequences. But as his actions become increasingly evil, for how long can he hide the secret behind his eternal youth? … More
as Dorian Gray
as Emily Wooton
as Lord Henry Wooton
as Sybil Vane
as Basil Hallward
as Alan Campbell
as Lady Victoria Wooten
as Lady Radley
Dorian Gray Videos
No Friends? Inconceivable! Log in to see what your friends have to say.Login
Critic Reviews for Dorian Gray
While Wilde's wit remains firmly entrenched, there's also a gruesome vein of gothic horror, and elements of the original which existed in the subtext or were merely hinted at are brought graphically into the open.
If it was Oscar Wilde who said that experience is the name that everyone gives to their mistakes, then this Dorian Gray is quite an experience!
This uneasy mixture of horror and elegant wit, which worked so well originally, never really catches fire thanks to Parker's undistinguished handling.
Colin Firth is perfect as the devil's advocate, as this adaptation of 19th century gothic taps into the modern zeitgeist.
It's a morality tale told through amorality and the pursuit of pleasures of the flesh
There's an edge of psychological horror in director Oliver Parker's third Oscar Wilde story that tells how Ben Barnes' Dorian Gray sells his soul to the devil in return for his youth and beauty
By leaving nothing up to the imagination, Parker destroys the very essence of the film.
An impressive character piece that explores important themes ... as well as embellishing aspects of the original story that have never been fleshed out so elaborately.
Depravity is better suggested than made explicit when it becomes vulgar, pornographic or comic, and possibly all three.
A sturdy piece of heritage horror, as tasteful and handsome as any Brit movie with bustles and frock-coats on its agenda.
A very respectful retelling and study of man's inherent quest for self-destruction given the removal of personal ramifications.
Teenagers will love this film. They will love it because there are lots of close-ups of Barnes being done unto or doing unto others. As a vehicle for a rising and undeniably talented star, it hits the spot.
An ambitious if decidedly uneven interpretation of the last great Gothic horror novel.
These are interesting ideas, but they would work better if there was more decadence on show earlier on to nail Gray's corruption.
Wilde survives intact - and with some flair - although the results will do more for sixth-form literature students and their teachers than for film connoisseurs.
Audience Reviews for Dorian Gray
A decent gothic tale, but could have done with a bit more action, or following the story as he travels the world over the years. Colin Firth steals the show here though, but overall could have been much better considering the run time.More
I haven't read the book so I have no idea if this is a respectful adaptation or not but personally I found that, although there are moments I could recognise Oscar Wilde's words, they were very far and few between. I didn't dislike the film but I get the feeling there was probably more to the story in the book. The CGI tricks in the painting were a bit cheap but the impressive performances made it very watchable.More
A British aesthete realizes that a painting of him manifests all the physical evidence of anything he does.
I'm trying not to be the snobby literature teacher whom everybody hated in high school or that literature survey class you were forced to take Freshman year, but the distortions that Oscar Wilde's masterpiece was subjected to in this film are almost too much to bear. Avoiding that persona, I'm forced to say that Lord Henry doesn't work as a character if he is bland and evil the way Colin Firth plays him here. The timeline of the film is vastly extended compared to the book, and Sybil's influence is reduced. These latter changes aren't particularly damning, but turning Henry into a leering villain is. Rather than Wilde's tale being about an extreme expression of the aesthete, Dorian Gray suggests that murder and illicit sex are logical extensions of the aesthete's philosophy. Because Wilde considered himself an aesthete, I doubt that he would approve.
So it's clear that the film differs from the book, but these differences don't necessarily mean it's a bad film. No, the stolid performances and unevenness of the story make it a bad film.
Overall, read the book or -- though I haven't seen it -- the older version, The Picture of Dorian Gray, can't be worse.
This film is visually appealing. Colin Firth is a powerhouse in this film along with actors Ben Chaplin, and Rebecca Hall. The special effects visuals and the dressing of sets and costumes are all fantastic. This all said, the film is as if director Oliver Parker read Oscar Wilde's novel and then watched a 24/7 rerun of Stanley Kubrick's Eyes Wide Shut, and then watched the abysmal end of The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen for the film's climax. The story of Dorian Gray and his mysterious painting is one of the best tales put to paper, and at first, the first act is set up rather well and the character development is rather nice. But by the time things begin to progress, that is where the story kind of fell apart, the script became rushed and the performance levels of the main star (Ben Barnes) and other supporting actors like Rachel Hurd-Wood diminished, seeminlgly abandoned for a film that looked good as opposed to telling a great story; and even this is only short lived because of the choppy editing of the center of the film. Not horrible, kept my attention, was definitely entertaining and engaging, but the parts that it lacked really could have been avoided if more effort and time were paid to them, and we would have really wound up with a masterwork, but alas, we do not.More
Dorian Gray Quotes
Discuss Dorian Gray on our Movie forum!