Anacondas: The Hunt for the Blood Orchid - Rotten Tomatoes

Anacondas: The Hunt for the Blood Orchid (2004)

Anacondas: The Hunt for the Blood Orchid

TOMATOMETER

AUDIENCE SCORE

Critic Consensus: A cheesy monster B-movie.


Movie Info

Directed by Dwight H. Little, Anacondas: The Hunt for the Blood Orchid is the sequel to 1997's tongue-in-cheek Anaconda, though none of the original cast have returned. The film chronicles a fateful mission ordered by a pharmaceutical giant: to travel deep in to the jungles of Borneo, where a rare black orchid -- one that can be used to attain immortality -- has bloomed for hundreds of years, unbeknownst to man. The eager horticulturists sent have no idea that an indigenous population of … More

Rating: PG-13 (for action violence, scary images and some language)
Genre: Action & Adventure , Horror
Directed By:
Written By: Jim Cash , Jack Epps , John Claflin , Daniel Zelman , Michael Miner
In Theaters:
On DVD: Dec 21, 2004
Box Office: $31.5M
Runtime:
Sony Pictures Releasing - Official Site

Cast


as Dr. Jack Byron

as Bill Johnson

as Sam Rogers

as Dr. Ben Douglas

as Gordon Mitchell

as Cole Burris

as John Livingston

as Christina Van Dyke

as Lead Lopak Hunter

as Lopak Hunter

as Bartender
Show More Cast

Friend Ratings

No Friends? Inconceivable! Log in to see what your friends have to say.

Login

Critic Reviews for Anacondas: The Hunt for the Blood Orchid

All Critics (125) | Top Critics (34)

It's a bad movie, really bad, and in the end I was just baffled that this was actually made.

Full Review… | April 29, 2009
Cinema Crazed

...represents a significant improvement over its lackluster predecessor...

Full Review… | January 20, 2009
Reel Film Reviews

The character development is as thin as shed snakeskin.

Full Review… | July 25, 2005

So who is this movie for? Based on my experience at the theater, kids who just turned thirteen yesterday.

Full Review… | June 17, 2005

This is a film that manages to take what should have been delirious camp fun and turn it into a struggle to keep any remote interest.

Full Review… | December 20, 2004
eFilmCritic.com

Provides some unintentional laughs and genuine bursts of adrenalin, however hokey it gets and however Harry Potterish the snakes.

Full Review… | December 20, 2004
Movie Metropolis

Audience Reviews for Anacondas: The Hunt for the Blood Orchid

Strangely enough I actually liked this sequel over the first film which was a big surprise as I really expected a complete pile of nonsense and that would look pathetic. So much to my amazement I found myself enjoying the film from start to finish, yes the plot is basic with your typical group of adventurers taken down one by one, but its actually made pretty well on location and it does look real-ish.

The effects are about on par with the first film but just that tiny bit better due to advancement with CGI effects obviously. A lot of the snake effects are in the dark or under heavy shadow so its hard to pinpoint if they are actually any good or not but I guess that's how you properly deal with a creature effect and make it effective. As said location work really adds a lot to the film and raises it above your average B-movie schlock. The scenery does look like real deep dark thick jungle and what sets there are look quite authentic, nice boat/river direction too.

Casting is reasonable with no big names but all characters are fun to watch. Messner is your gruff unshaven 'Indy' type hero whilst Marsden is great as the cliched British scientist/villain. The rest are your usual mix of stereotypes that we've seen before but always fun to see new creative teams of oddballs. This lesser known cast actually works better than the big name cast from the first film in my opinion as your not overly sure who will survive to the end, it just feels that bit more exciting and fresh.

Everything about this sequel is just a slight cut above the first film. Yep believe it or not but its true, pure hokey B-movie fodder that's highly enjoyable and is actually just as good if not better than the original.

More
phubbs1
Phil Hubbs

Super Reviewer

This sequel to Anaconda looks strained, tiresome and overall it's a boring film that just misses the mark. The film has a poorly written script, a bad cast and poor effects. This is very much like the first film where the filmmakers made a killer creature horror film, but they didn't care how it turned out. This one didn't do it for me and I felt it was quite horrible with nothing really going for it and it just didn't deliver anything fun or memorable. I've seen my fare share of these types of films, and this is one of the worst that I had the misfortune to see. The film is just not fun to watch, while these films are supposed to be, this was just poorly made trash that simply didn't deliver. The Anacondas series is horrible, and with this sequel you can understand why. You get a broader picture as to why these films simply don't deliver anything worth seeing. This is one of those sequels that is worse than the first. The film suffers from a bad script, a poor cast and basically everything that made the first film forgettable. As low-budget horror goes, this one misses the mark. There's nothing memorable about this. This is just a poorly executed horror film with no payoff. If you've seen the first film, then you don't need to see this film, it's all the same in the end with little substance or hint of effective terror, which in turn make these films not worth seeing. Don't expect anything if you decide to watch this film. This is standard low-budget horror that fails to deliver what it tries to do.

More
TheDudeLebowski65
Alex roy

Super Reviewer

½

4 words. Exploding Snake-Ball Orgy

More
kenstachnik
Ken Stachnik

Super Reviewer

Anacondas: The Hunt for the Blood Orchid Quotes

– Submitted by Rawballs B (21 months ago)
– Submitted by Jayathra L (2 years ago)
– Submitted by Kerwin M (3 years ago)
– Submitted by Kerwin M (3 years ago)

Discussion Forum

Discuss Anacondas: The Hunt for the Blood Orchid on our Movie forum!