Opening

19% Transcendence Apr 18
53% Heaven Is for Real Apr 16
8% A Haunted House 2 Apr 18
88% Bears Apr 18
57% Fading Gigolo Apr 18

Top Box Office

89% Captain America: The Winter Soldier $41.3M
48% Rio 2 $39.3M
70% Oculus $12.0M
62% Draft Day $9.8M
77% Noah $7.6M
40% Divergent $7.4M
13% God's Not Dead $5.5M
92% The Grand Budapest Hotel $4.1M
79% Muppets Most Wanted $2.3M
78% Mr. Peabody & Sherman $1.9M

Coming Soon

44% The Other Woman Apr 25
—— Brick Mansions Apr 25
71% The Amazing Spider-Man 2 May 02
100% Neighbors May 09
—— Godzilla May 16

New Episodes Tonight

—— Continuum: Season 3
100% Hannibal: Season 2
—— Hart of Dixie: Season 3
—— Last Man Standing: Season 3
—— Unforgettable: Season 2

Discuss Last Night's Shows

—— Anger Management: Season 2
92% Community: Season 5
55% The Crazy Ones: Season 1
100% Grey's Anatomy: Season 10
90% Parenthood: Season 5
100% Parks and Recreation: Season 6
100% Portlandia: Season 4
55% Reign: Season 1
0% Saint George: Season 1
100% Scandal: Season 3
73% Sirens: Season 1
68% Surviving Jack: Season 1
92% Vikings: Season 2

Certified Fresh TV

77% About a Boy: Season 1
97% The Americans: Season 2
82% The Blacklist: Season 1
88% Brooklyn Nine-Nine: Season 1
85% Enlisted: Season 1
98% Fargo: Season 1
98% Game of Thrones: Season 4
100% Hannibal: Season 2
85% Mad Men: Season 7
100% Orphan Black: Season 2
96% Silicon Valley: Season 1

Charlie's Angels Reviews

Nigel Floyd
Time Out
Top Critic IconTop Critic

This is nothing but trailer moments. Ex-pop video director McG couldn't organise a pillow fight in a bedding factory.

Full Review Source: Time Out

February 9, 2006
David Edelstein
Slate
Top Critic IconTop Critic

Charlie's Angels is like a Hong Kong flick but without the bogus spirituality and excruciating schlock-pop ballads.

Full Review Source: Slate

June 30, 2003
Liam Lacey
Globe and Mail
Top Critic IconTop Critic

A speedy, ask-no-questions pop contrivance that, as long as it keeps sparkling and whirling, continually amuses.

Full Review Source: Globe and Mail | Original Score: 3/4

March 19, 2002
Peter Rainer
New York Magazine
Top Critic IconTop Critic

The cast members seem to be having a high old time, and with sharper dialogue, an even higher time might have been had by all.

Full Review Source: New York Magazine

January 22, 2002
Peter Travers
Rolling Stone
Top Critic IconTop Critic

These kickass Barbies bring heart to a machine-tooled genre.

| Original Score: 4/5

May 8, 2001
Joel Siegel
Good Morning America
Top Critic IconTop Critic

| Original Score: B+

April 23, 2001
Kirk Honeycutt
Hollywood Reporter
Top Critic IconTop Critic

The good-natured humor of its three stars, who appear to be having a gas playing these ridiculous figures, goes a long way in overcoming the bad jokes and even worse plot twists.

January 1, 2000
Mark Rahner
Seattle Times
Top Critic IconTop Critic

While the initial three-on-one fight between the Angels and Glover is an outright hoot, the excess, the sameness and the lack of so much as a bruise from all of it on any Angel T or A gets numbing.

January 1, 2000
A.O. Scott
New York Times
Top Critic IconTop Critic

Sure, it's easy on the eyes, but would a little brains be too much to ask?

Full Review Source: New York Times | Original Score: 2.5/5

January 1, 2000
Owen Gleiberman
Entertainment Weekly
Top Critic IconTop Critic

Charlie's Angels is ... Cameron Diaz's movie.

Full Review Source: Entertainment Weekly | Original Score: B

January 1, 2000
Jay Carr
Boston Globe
Top Critic IconTop Critic

The fact that Charlie's Angels amounts to little more than disarming patchwork scarcely seems to matter because it's so easy to ride the trio's exhilarating acrobatics and deftly self-mocking sex-kitten moves.

January 1, 2000
Roger Ebert
Chicago Sun-Times
Top Critic IconTop Critic

Charlie's Angels is like the trailer for a video game movie, lacking only the video game, and the movie.

Full Review Source: Chicago Sun-Times | Original Score: 0.5/4

January 1, 2000
Terry Lawson
Detroit Free Press
Top Critic IconTop Critic

I guess I'm just supposed to sit back and enjoy it, but somehow I feel exploited.

January 1, 2000
Stephanie Zacharek
Salon.com
Top Critic IconTop Critic

As a director, McG is far too hyperactive to hold the story together neatly.

Full Review Source: Salon.com

January 1, 2000
Desson Thomson
Washington Post
Top Critic IconTop Critic

The good news about Charlie's Angels: The gals are fab. And so's the movie.

Full Review Source: Washington Post | Original Score: 4/5

January 1, 2000
Carrie Rickey
Philadelphia Inquirer
Top Critic IconTop Critic

This choppily edited film looks like confetti.

January 1, 2000
Eric Harrison
Houston Chronicle
Top Critic IconTop Critic

Funny, fast-paced, occasionally exciting, and you can't take your eyes off it.

Full Review Source: Houston Chronicle

January 1, 2000
James Berardinelli
ReelViews
Top Critic IconTop Critic

You'd have to be a hopeless curmudgeon not to be entertained on some juvenile level by this motion picture.

Full Review Source: ReelViews | Original Score: 3/4

January 1, 2000
Kevin Maynard
Mr. Showbiz
Top Critic IconTop Critic

Jokey homage? Hong Kong action blowout? What's going on here?

| Original Score: 50/100

January 1, 2000
Steve Murray
Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Top Critic IconTop Critic

The funniest pop-culture romp since Austin Powers first pranced down Carnaby Street.

Full Review Source: Atlanta Journal-Constitution

January 1, 2000
Philip Wuntch
Dallas Morning News
Top Critic IconTop Critic

A no-brainer, it definitely is. But you'll leave the theater with a smile.

Full Review Source: Dallas Morning News

January 1, 2000
Moira MacDonald
Film.com
Top Critic IconTop Critic

An amiable mess.

January 1, 2000
Mick LaSalle
San Francisco Chronicle
Top Critic IconTop Critic

An utter debacle.

Full Review Source: San Francisco Chronicle | Original Score: 1/4

January 1, 2000
Michael Wilmington
Chicago Tribune
Top Critic IconTop Critic

There's no grace or wit here, no surprise -- and not even much nostalgia.

January 1, 2000
Robert Denerstein
Denver Rocky Mountain News
Top Critic IconTop Critic

| Original Score: B

January 1, 2000
Susan Stark
Detroit News
Top Critic IconTop Critic

An immensely entertaining movie.

Full Review Source: Detroit News | Original Score: 3/4

January 1, 2000
Gene Seymour
Newsday
Top Critic IconTop Critic

Forty years from now, academics may want to deconstruct this movie into semiotic sushi ... For now, it's best that you turn off your brain and dip into the meringue.

January 1, 2000
Jay Boyar
Orlando Sentinel
Top Critic IconTop Critic

[McG] is in way over his head.

January 1, 2000
Peter Howell
Toronto Star
Top Critic IconTop Critic

It beats the similar opener to this year's Mission: Impossible 2 and it could make you wonder if Bond has ever done it better.

Full Review Source: Toronto Star

January 1, 2000
Robert Horton
Film.com
Top Critic IconTop Critic

Charlie's Angels is something rare: a mess of a movie that is somehow infectious, and infectious not despite the mess, but because of it.

January 1, 2000
Todd McCarthy
Variety
Top Critic IconTop Critic

This entertaining confection possesses the substance of the TV show, the pacing of a Hong Kong actioner and the production values of a James Bond thriller.

Full Review Source: Variety

January 1, 2000
Rene Rodriguez
Miami Herald
Top Critic IconTop Critic

The kind of self-reflective exercise The Last Action Hero could only dream of being.

January 1, 2000
Steven Rosen
Denver Post
Top Critic IconTop Critic

This would have made a great summer movie.

Full Review Source: Denver Post

January 1, 2000
Paul Clinton (CNN.com)
CNN.com
Top Critic IconTop Critic

Despite the fact that the film loses its razor sharp pacing and muddles its storyline, the movie still features plenty of big explosions, loud music and bare flesh.

Full Review Source: CNN.com

January 1, 2000
Jonathan Foreman
New York Post
Top Critic IconTop Critic

Charlie's Angels is utterly good-hearted, mildly naughty fun that moves along at a cracking pace to the tune of a trendy pop score.

January 1, 2000
Kenneth Turan
Los Angeles Times
Top Critic IconTop Critic

Though all this is fun and engaging in short bursts ... it wears thin and strains our patience when stretched to cover even this film's brief 92-minute length.

Full Review Source: Los Angeles Times | Original Score: 2.5/5

January 1, 2000
Find us on:                 
Help | About | Jobs | Critics Submission | Press | API | Licensing | Mobile