Far From Heaven (2003)

TOMATOMETER

AUDIENCE SCORE

Critic Consensus: An exquisitely designed and performed melodrama, Far From Heaven earns its viewers' tears with sincerity and intelligence.


Movie Info

It is the fall of 1957. The Whitakers, the very picture of a suburban family, make their home in Hartford, Connecticut. Their daily existences are characterized by carefully observed family etiquette, social events, and an overall desire to keep up with the Joneses. Cathy Whitaker is the homemaker, wife and mother. Frank Whitaker is the breadwinner, husband and father. Together they have the perfect '50s life: healthy kids and social prominence. Then one night, Cathy discovers her husband's … More

Rating: PG-13 (for mature thematic elements, sexual content, brief violence and language)
Genre: Drama, Romance
Directed By:
Written By: Todd Haynes
In Theaters:
On DVD: Apr 1, 2003
Box Office: $15.8M
Runtime:
USA Films - Official Site

Cast


as Cathy Whitaker

as Frank Whitaker

as Raymond Deagan

as Eleanor Fine

as Dr. Bowman

as Mrs. Leacock

as David

as Mona Lauder

as Photographer

as Reginald Carter

as Elderly Woman

as Man with Moustache

as Spanish Bartender

as Red-Faced Man

as Farnsworth

as Soda Jerk

as Tallman

as Officer No. 1

as Officer No. 2

as Hotel Waiter

as Hutch's Friend

as Receptionist

as Conductor

as Bail Clerk

as Blond Boy

as Blond Boy's Father

as Staff Member No. 1

as Woman at Party

as Glaring Man

as Pool Mother

as Pool Daughter

as Band Leader
Show More Cast

News & Interviews for Far From Heaven

Friend Ratings

No Friends? Inconceivable! Log in to see what your friends have to say.

Login

Critic Reviews for Far From Heaven

All Critics (210) | Top Critics (50)

The actors move about this elaborate movie museum in a modified dream state, as if living in the present while rooted in the past. But the strategy doesn't work. It's an imitation of lifelessness.

Full Review… | April 1, 2014
Wall Street Journal
Top Critic

We are left wondering why, in any case, an imitation Sirk was needed, what appetite or interest it might fill. Even with its latter-day (modified) frankness, Far From Heaven is only thin glamour that lacks a tacit wry base.

Full Review… | April 1, 2014
The New Republic
Top Critic

With tact and care, the movie digs into all the subjects that lay concealed below the surface when Max Ophuls and Douglas Sirk were filming their own melodramas in the nineteen-fifties.

Full Review… | April 1, 2014
New Yorker
Top Critic

Quaid makes a decent man's anguish richly palpable. Moore makes us feel hidden frenzy with a cool and ultimately heartbreaking grace.

Full Review… | April 1, 2014
TIME Magazine
Top Critic

Haynes doesn't simply take a Norman Rockwell setting and release the hounds, either. He deals with these issues directly, but gently, as if his and Sirk's audiences were the same.

Full Review… | April 1, 2014
New York Daily News
Top Critic

Todd Haynes has crafted a feature-length homage to Sirk that succeeds both on its own terms and as the Sirk film that could never have been made in his own lifetime.

Full Review… | April 1, 2014
AV Club
Top Critic

Audience Reviews for Far From Heaven

I can't help but think that Mad Men took some of its inspiration from this piece. Interracial romances and homosexuality were so much more salacious when they were taboo...

Letitia Lew
Letitia Lew

Super Reviewer

Todd Haynes is known for his subversion of styles and formats with his work, and with this film, he takes aim at the look and feel of classic 1950s Hollywood melodramas, particularly of the Douglas Sirk variety.

This is the story of a seemingly idealic lead by housewife Cathy Whitaker and her corporate ladder climbing husband Frank. Their lives seem perfect, and to their friends in neighbors in Hartford, they are truly the stand up citizens of the community.

However, this is far from the case beneath the surface of things, and the majority of the film is dedicated to focusing on the effect of when the imperfections of their lives start to break through the surface, and, in line with Haynes's trademarks, the major issues that are focused on here include alienation/isolation, and homosexuality. And, since the film is set in the 1950s, race and class are focused on, too.

The specific story might not be the strongest aspect of things, but it's still really solid, compelling, and well done. The film does lose some steam in the third act, and overall it is rather inconsistent tonally, but that's pretty muchc my only complaints. The technical side of things is absolutely brilliant. Not only does this film capture the era of the 50s with the look, feel, styles, period details, and attitudes, but it reflects the films of that era as well. This is an absolutely gorgeous looking picture, with some of the most expressive cinematography I've seen in a while, with much of the lighting and colors reminding me of Kubrick. Elmer Bernstein provided the music, and it was one of his final scores, if not the complete last. It's maybe a bit overwrought and a tad too melodramatic at times, but nonetheless gorgeous and fitting.

This film also swings for the fences where the performances are concerned. Quaid's not in it that much, but he makes the most of his screen time, and gives one of the best performances of his career. Moore really owns the screen here, and this is some of her most beautifuly nuanced work. It's memorable, though not as idiosyncratically so as her most unforgettable roles. Haysbert takes what could have been a one note role and breathes life, depth, and subtelty into it, and it is also one of his standout turns.

All in all, this is a successful film. It accomplished its mission wonderfully, and even got to add some edge to it given that it came out in a less restrictive era than the one its emulating and portraying. I've mentioned it's flaws, but even with them the film is a nice piece of work that's thoughtful, enjoyable, and worth discussing.

cosmo313
Chris Weber

Super Reviewer

21/08/2010 (TELEVISION)

I had nothing better to do and happened to catch this on TV. Good thing I did, I really got soaked into it and began to be concerned while the story continued to unleash the darkness.

It's around the 1950's, so the whole interracial thing is a "BIG NO NO" along with homosexuality. A story that tells us how it was and how it usually ended which in reality is not always good sadly.

The world was so black and white at one stage and full of prejudice and "false righteousness". Though truthful and sad it's a decent enough flick for having a glimpse of the world before now.

EightThirty
EightThirty .

Super Reviewer

Far From Heaven Quotes

– Submitted by Frances H (11 months ago)

Discussion Forum

Discuss Far From Heaven on our Movie forum!