Ghostbusters 2 (1989)

TOMATOMETER

AUDIENCE SCORE

Critic Consensus: Thanks to the cast, Ghostbusters 2 is reasonably amusing, but it lacks the charm, wit, and energy of its predecessor.


Movie Info

Ivan Reitman's sequel to the phenomenally successful Ghostbusters is looser and more self-assured than the original. The film opens with a title reading "Five Years Later" and finds the ghostbusters living in hard times. A restraining order has forbidden the boys to partake in paranormal warfare, and as a result they have had to seek other lines of work. Ray (Dan Aykroyd) and Winston (Ernie Hudson) spend their time performing at children's' birthday parties, and Egon (Harold Ramis) is busy … More

Rating: PG (violence)
Genre: Science Fiction & Fantasy, Comedy
Directed By:
Written By: Harold Ramis, Dan Aykroyd
In Theaters:
On DVD: Jun 29, 1999
Runtime:
Sony Pictures Home Entertainment

Cast


as Dr. Peter Venkman

as Dr. Raymond Stantz

as Dana Barrett

as Dr. Egon Spengler

as Louis Tully

as Winston Zeddemore

as Janine Melnitz

as Janosz Poha

as The Judge

as Mayor of New York

as Hardemeyer

as The Prosecutor

as Frank, the Doorman

as Meter Maid

as Man with a Ticket

as Young Woman on Crutc...

as Brownstone Mother

as Spectator

as Spengler's Assistant

as Girl with Puppy

as lst Cop

as Con Ed Supervisor

as Stenographer

as Mayor's Doorman

as Maitre d'

as Slimed Restaurant Pa...

as Store Manager

as Police Sergeant

as Police Lieutenant

as Dock Supervisor

as Maria, Dana's Maid

as Psychiatrist

as Woman with Fur Coat

as Plaza Hotel Man

as Public Works Officia...

as Fire Commissioner

as Police Commissioner

as Brownstone Boy No. 1

as Brownstone Boy No. 2

as Restaurant Cop No. 1

as Restaurant Cop No. 2

as Arguing Couple

as Arguing Couple

as Detective No. 1

as Detective No. 2

as Detective No. 3

as Venkman's Talk Show ...

as Venkman's Talk Show ...
Show More Cast

News & Interviews for Ghostbusters 2

Friend Ratings

No Friends? Inconceivable! Log in to see what your friends have to say.

Login

Critic Reviews for Ghostbusters 2

All Critics (36) | Top Critics (7)

The sequel is, on the whole, a fairly mechanical spook show, filled with grinning ghosts that are definitely ghoulish but hardly menacing.

Full Review… | June 15, 2015
New York Daily News
Top Critic

There's very little energy in the follow-through, and this time Murray's listlessness seems more anemic than comic.

Full Review… | May 30, 2007
Chicago Reader
Top Critic

Kids will find the oozing slime and ghastly, ghostly apparitions to their liking and adults will enjoy the preposterously clever dialog.

Full Review… | May 30, 2007
Variety
Top Critic

The film is largely an excuse for a cast get-together, with the Ghostbusters, under judicial restraining order after the havoc wreaked in part one, suffering lives of semi-obscurity.

Full Review… | June 24, 2006
Time Out
Top Critic

Even the special effects are more to the point of the comedy than they were in the first film. For some reason, this appears to leave more room for the sort of random funny business that Mr. Murray and his friends do best.

Full Review… | May 20, 2003
New York Times
Top Critic

You want more.

Full Review… | January 1, 2000
Washington Post
Top Critic

Audience Reviews for Ghostbusters 2

It's pretty tough for a sequel to best, let alone match it's predecessor, especially when the first one is an undisputed masterpiece.

So yeah, Ghostbusters II isn't as good as the first, but it's not a bad film by any means. Unfortunately most people don't see it that way. Me, I really like this one, and think it's still a really decent film, even though it isn't what it could have been.

The story begins five years after the first. Following the defeat of Gozer at the end of the first film, the Ghostbusters have actually fallen on hard times. Instead of being hailed as saviors, they have since been slapped with a restraining order and forced to cease their ghostbusting due to all the collateral damage their 'busting' causes. As a result, the four have hung up their proton packs and gone on to other activities.

However, they are forced to get back to it when an evil ooze begins wreaking havoc, especially when it possesses a painting of an evil 16th Century Carpathian tyrant named Vigo, causing him to come to life to terrorize all who end up in his way.

I think the main issue at hand here is sequelitis. It's just unable to capture the magic that made the first so special. It doesn't have the freshness, nor does it have the same level of laughs, wit, and energy. Ivan Reitman returned as director, and co-stars Aykroyd and Ramis once again wrote the script, and, while they don't do bad in these roles, their performances don't really stand out. I do however, like that they raised the stakes, and showed how actions have consequences. I just wish they could have come up with some more creative and stronger ideas.

The music is still good though, and I still dig the effects, and yeah, the performances are fine, if slightly worn, but, even though this one has it's moments, it doesn't have near as much heart as it should.

I'm still giving this one a really high rating though, as I'm a big fan, I like these guys and what they do, and it's still a fun and entertaining film. Yeah, some of it is a bit sillier, but I can't help but like it. Without a doubt, my main reason for really liking this is personal. Sentimentality is key here, as the earliest memory that I can recall is seeing this in the theater when I was a mere three years old. I can only recall one scene clearly, but still, it's a memory I want to cherish as long as possible.

Bottom line: yeah, this is a step down, but it's still a pretty decent film, and offers a fair amount of entertainment, and, compared to a lot of sequels, it's quite strong, so give it a chance.

cosmo313
Chris Weber

Super Reviewer

½

For a sequel to a masterpiece it couldn't possibly live up to, this is quite an underrated bit of fun. Not sure why so many hold it in such low regard, because I think it successfully maintains the spirit of its predecessor.

Sure, the plot isn't as exciting and the main villain is kind of lame, but the wonderful wit and interplay is still very much intact, which is what counts in my book. I suppose Bill Murray is chiefly to thank for that though. You can't help but love his sarcastic, cynical and hopelessly womanizing character. His lines are so perfectly timed that you're wondering if he's not making it all up on the spot.

At any rate, we can only hope that the intended third film (which now, perhaps for the best, looks doomed to become a non-event) won't ruin any of that. I mean, Hollywood has already managed to defile other 80's gems like Star Wars and Indiana Jones. If the same thing happens to the Ghostbusters franchise, I don't know what I'll do, but it ain't gonna be pretty. And by "not pretty" I mean something along the lines of Vigo's morning face.

CloudStrife84
Mike S

Super Reviewer

The Original Ghostbusters set a new standard for comedy, horror and Sci Fi. The first was a big hit, and is one of the best comedies with Sci Fi and horror elements. It's only naturally that they would make a sequel to the first one. The question that one who's never seen the sequel will probably ask the age old question, is it better than the first one? Unfortunately no. The film feels more silly than fun, and the characters here are more irritating. What made the original so good was the witty originality and the use of many genres to create a terrific, memorable film. With Ghostbusters it acts more of a comedy as the aspects that made the original so good, are almost entirely absent. The film is very tongue in Cheek, and while the first had a bit of seriousness to its brand of comedy, the comedy shown here is almost frustrating and not original. Ghostbusters was an effective film due to the simple fact that it blended Comedy, sci fi, horror and mystery in to it's well written script. Ghostbusters 2 is an inferior sequel but definitely has good enough elements going for it that it's still a average film to watch. The film may make you divided in the sense that you either don't know if it's good, bad or awful. But if you loved the first entry, and I mean really enjoyed it, then you might be disappointed with this film.
But with this one, it seems a little tired out. But it's still a good film to watch, and has some good creative elements, and despite all its faults, in the end who you gonna call?

TheDudeLebowski65
Alex roy

Super Reviewer

Ghostbusters 2 Quotes

– Submitted by Jared B (2 years ago)
– Submitted by Cameron D (3 years ago)
– Submitted by bob j (3 years ago)
– Submitted by topher h (3 years ago)

Discussion Forum

Discuss Ghostbusters 2 on our Movie forum!