Average Rating: 5.2/10
Reviews Counted: 35
Fresh: 18 | Rotten: 17
No consensus yet.
Average Rating: 5.4/10
Critic Reviews: 5
Fresh: 3 | Rotten: 2
No consensus yet.
liked it
Average Rating: 3.2/5
User Ratings: 379,242
Ivan Reitman's sequel to the phenomenally successful Ghostbusters is looser and more self-assured than the original. The film opens with a title reading "Five Years Later" and finds the ghostbusters living in hard times. A restraining order has forbidden the boys to partake in paranormal warfare, and as a result they have had to seek other lines of work. Ray (Dan Aykroyd) and Winston (Ernie Hudson) spend their time performing at children's' birthday parties, and Egon (Harold Ramis) is busy
Jun 16, 1989 Wide
Jun 29, 1999
Sony Pictures Home Entertainment
All Critics (35) | Top Critics (5) | Fresh (19) | Rotten (17) | DVD (14)
There's very little energy in the follow-through, and this time Murray's listlessness seems more anemic than comic.
Kids will find the oozing slime and ghastly, ghostly apparitions to their liking and adults will enjoy the preposterously clever dialog.
Top CriticEven the special effects are more to the point of the comedy than they were in the first film. For some reason, this appears to leave more room for the sort of random funny business that Mr. Murray and his friends do best.
You want more.
Hammered together out of the junkiest of elements, the movie rattles along with a pleasing rambunctiousness, tossing off its quips and one-liners and scoring on a remarkably high percentage of them.
An almost uniformly substandard follow-up that, since the original film remains so beloved by so many people, still gets to be disappointing even two decades and change later.
Plenty of agreeable nonsense to develop within the larger Ghostbusters universe. It's a sincerely amusing movie, warmly energized to give fans a steamy second helping of the good stuff.
Effectively slimed everyone's fond memories of the original.
Frankly, Murray, Sigourney Weaver and even Aykroyd deserve much better.
A little of a rehash but still good.
Almost as sharp as the first film and only suffering slightly from the inevitable repetitions.
A terrible disappointment, a shockingly self-satisfied and unforgivably slapdash sequel.
The film is largely an excuse for a cast get-together, with the Ghostbusters, under judicial restraining order after the havoc wreaked in part one, suffering lives of semi-obscurity.
Feels like a blueprint concocted by the bean-counters at Columbia Pictures.
Takes a bit of the sheen off the series, but still scores solid laughs.
Bottom line: with Murray on fire and enough clever dialogue to rival its predecessor, Ghostbusters II is good enough to put post-milennial comedy to shame.
No one has ever accused Ghostbusters II of being a great film, or even a good one, for that matter
Though not at all on par with the first, this sequel is still entertaining and satisfying.
November 20, 2011Super Reviewer
Several years after the success that was the first Ghostbusters, a sequel was made, and it is a film that often is considered by many people as a mixed bag. Me personally, I love it, sure it isn't as big of a fresh air or as funny as its predecessor, but the effects are still great, the comedy works well, the acting is
December 28, 2010Super Reviewer
| 35% | The Hangover Part II |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 81% | Kung Fu Panda 2 |
| 44% | Cowboys & Aliens |
| 83% | Rise of the Planet of the Apes |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 88% | Lady and the Tramp |
| 69% | A Very Harold & Kumar Christmas |
| 21% | Fireflies in the Garden |
| 45% | The Rebound |
What are his 10 best movies ever?
See the all-new action-packed trailer!
Five new Marvelous pictures
Unconventional Superheroes