Average Rating: 5.2/10
Reviews Counted: 35
Fresh: 18 | Rotten: 17
No consensus yet.
Average Rating: 5.4/10
Critic Reviews: 5
Fresh: 3 | Rotten: 2
No consensus yet.
liked it
Average Rating: 3.2/5
User Ratings: 379,242
Connect with Facebook and get a full-length movie from Flixster!
The gift movie added to
your Flixster Collection is...
Ivan Reitman's sequel to the phenomenally successful Ghostbusters is looser and more self-assured than the original. The film opens with a title reading "Five Years Later" and finds the ghostbusters living in hard times. A restraining order has forbidden the boys to partake in paranormal warfare, and as a result they have had to seek other lines of work. Ray (Dan Aykroyd) and Winston (Ernie Hudson) spend their time performing at children's' birthday parties, and Egon (Harold Ramis) is busy
Jun 16, 1989 Wide
Jun 29, 1999
Sony Pictures Home Entertainment
All Critics (35) | Top Critics (5) | Fresh (19) | Rotten (17) | DVD (14)
There's very little energy in the follow-through, and this time Murray's listlessness seems more anemic than comic.
Kids will find the oozing slime and ghastly, ghostly apparitions to their liking and adults will enjoy the preposterously clever dialog.
Top CriticEven the special effects are more to the point of the comedy than they were in the first film. For some reason, this appears to leave more room for the sort of random funny business that Mr. Murray and his friends do best.
You want more.
Hammered together out of the junkiest of elements, the movie rattles along with a pleasing rambunctiousness, tossing off its quips and one-liners and scoring on a remarkably high percentage of them.
An almost uniformly substandard follow-up that, since the original film remains so beloved by so many people, still gets to be disappointing even two decades and change later.
Plenty of agreeable nonsense to develop within the larger Ghostbusters universe. It's a sincerely amusing movie, warmly energized to give fans a steamy second helping of the good stuff.
Effectively slimed everyone's fond memories of the original.
Frankly, Murray, Sigourney Weaver and even Aykroyd deserve much better.
A little of a rehash but still good.
Almost as sharp as the first film and only suffering slightly from the inevitable repetitions.
A terrible disappointment, a shockingly self-satisfied and unforgivably slapdash sequel.
The film is largely an excuse for a cast get-together, with the Ghostbusters, under judicial restraining order after the havoc wreaked in part one, suffering lives of semi-obscurity.
Feels like a blueprint concocted by the bean-counters at Columbia Pictures.
Takes a bit of the sheen off the series, but still scores solid laughs.
Bottom line: with Murray on fire and enough clever dialogue to rival its predecessor, Ghostbusters II is good enough to put post-milennial comedy to shame.
No one has ever accused Ghostbusters II of being a great film, or even a good one, for that matter
The Original Ghostbusters set a new standard for comedy, horror and Sci Fi. The first was a big hit, and is one of the best comedies with Sci Fi and horror elements. It's only naturally that they would make a sequel to the first one. The question that one who's never seen the sequel will probably ask the age old
June 9, 2010
Super Reviewer
Though not at all on par with the first, this sequel is still entertaining and satisfying.
November 20, 2011Super Reviewer
| 54% | Safe House |
| 29% | The Vow |
| 94% | Mission: Impossible Ghost Protoc... |
| 28% | Underworld Awakening |
| 85% | Chronicle |
| 11% | Gone |
| 31% | Man on a Ledge |
| 76% | We Need to Talk About Kevin |
| 82% | Goon |
| 93% | Coriolanus |
Snow White Rules the Land
The Biggest Movies of 2012!
Action-Packed New Trailer!
Ridley Scott's Prometheus