Iron Man 3 Reviews
Super Reviewer
Super Reviewer
Super Reviewer
Super Reviewer
This is a film that non-comic fans can enjoy too.
Super Reviewer
Super Reviewer
In general, I found the writing incredibly weak. I mean, OK, we get it, he's having an identity crisis, he's more man than machine, but good lord, they really dragged us through a lot of crap, explicitly, to convey that.
The humour, and there's a lot of it, failed for me way more often than it worked.
Super Reviewer
Now look at the start of this film. 'Killian' approaches 'Stark' about his new company, 'Stark' denies him, so off he goes filled with vengeance, recreates himself as a nemesis to 'Stark' and the Iron Man hero, using his company alongside a new experiment. Notice any similarities here?.
I'm no Iron Man fanboy, I don't know all about the Iron Man lore, but that still doesn't detract from the fact they really fudged up 'The Mandarin'. The whole setup for this guy is really well done, it really is. We see lots of news footage, stock footage, hand held camera footage of the character as it buzzes around various TV stations. Its all been created in the same vain as reality, obviously in recent years with Osama Bin Laden and various other terrorist propaganda, what you would (and still do) see every night on the news. Footage of him with his extremists, firing guns, preaching, making statements etc...
'The Mandarin' is envisioned just like this and it all looks very realistic, threatening and intimidating, Black and his team really do make this villain look good, like he's really gonna be a hard underground nut to crack for 'Stark'. But then out of nowhere the whole setup is thrown out the window because the character is fake, a front, a big setup created by 'Killian' to cover himself and his experiments. Neat twist? yes, very much so...good idea? no definitely not, not for a franchise like this. A franchise where a villain like 'The Mandarin' is very popular and people wanna see 'The Mandarin', not a puppet creation.
A film like this hinges on its villain, usually the villain makes the film. In this case they made a great looking villain with Kingsley (despite his rather odd drawl) but they threw it away. Plus you also gotta ask yourself who would actually agree to act or play a villain to cover someone else? surely common sense would dictate that you're only gonna cause a lot of trouble for yourself? even if you didn't actually do any of the things you claim, you're still gonna be in the shit for being involved with terrorism. Just doesn't make any real sense to me.
Must admit I liked Kingsley's little performance in the reveal sequence, a kind of typical drunk, drugged up British hippie, but it just made a mockery of the whole film. Makes you feel you're watching a spoof not a serious adaptation.
Nice little touches of humour throughout as we have come to expect from this franchise and Downey. The small team up with the little kid isn't as cheesy as it sounds and offers some nice dialog, although one sequence seems to be pretty similar to a certain John Candy/Macaulay Culkin film from many moons ago.
On the whole the film is really quite average in my opinion. I didn't think that much of the whole 'Extremis' idea and the way characters looked when they went all ballistic. The visuals and ideas kinda looked like something from a hammy sci-fi flick to me, it all felt a bit 'X-Men-ish', a franchise I never liked. I still don't really get how this regenerative power causes people to have such extreme heat power, its suppose to help them heal no? so why the heat?. Plus I really don't see how 'Stark' manages to kill most of them when they can regenerate so easily, when 'Savin' is killed, why couldn't he regenerate from it?. The Extremis soldiers seemed so much more powerful, they could easily take down Iron Man suits as shown by 'Pepper Potts'.
The finale is on impressive scale but messy really. Lots of Iron Man suits flying all over the place, difficult to make out what exactly is going on, Extremis henchmen/women leaping all over the shop. It all sounds cool and the idea is cool but like some other superhero comicbook flicks it becomes a fast blur of CGI, an incoherent, badly lit, chaotic brawl between metal suits and CGI people. Plus I gotta ask, why didn't 'Stark' just utilize all his Iron Man suits together originally? before 'Jarvis' went offline, and why does 'Stark' keep running around without his suit?! just stay in it you fool!.
I must say I'm disappointed with this trilogy bookend. The first film was superb, the second (in my opinion) was clearly not as good as the first but still a solid action film. This third entry has lost me completely with bad plot decisions and untidy action sequences (something which the made the first so good, it was very clear without excess CGI mess).
So the question is...was this all just narration, a therapy session for 'Stark' to get some previous history of his chest with 'Banner'? or is that it? no more Iron Man films and no Iron Man for 'Avengers 2'?.
Super Reviewer
Super Reviewer
The movie's saving grace comes in Tony Stark's soul-searching journey with the kid. Despite most of the movie being out of the suit, the man himself in all his panic attack glory makes the superhero a bit more human.
Super Reviewer
Super Reviewer
Set some time after the events of The Avengers, Tony Stark is back in California, and dealing with the aftermath of the events in New York, namely by being restless, sleepless, and prone to occasional panic attacks. To put himself at ease, he devotes himself to making more Iron Man suits, much to the frustration of his lover Pepper Potts.
Tony's issues come to a head when attacks from a terrorist cell leader known as The Mandarin destroy his personal world, prompting him into an unbridled quest for vengeance.
The primary inspiration for this film comes from the Extremis storyline from the comics, which was also used in bits and pieces for the previous two Iron Man films. What I really liked most about this film is how it tackles the issue posed by Steve Rogers in The Avengers about what is Tony without his armor and toys.
This is the darkest of the three films in the series, and it has some great moments of tension and drama. It's still got that trademark with and humor though, which does help, because had this been done like Nolan's Batman films, then I'm not sure it'd be fun to endure. But it is fun, and the levity and darker material actually blend surprisingly well.
The script is pretty decent, but not without its faults, namely trying to juggle plot threads, one too many characters, as well as how come The Avengers aren't in this. The handling of the antagonist is actually something I'm okay with, but I'm sure that it won't please everyone. For the most part though, even with its faults, this is some really decent stuff, and a blast to watch.
The effects are top notch, there's some impressive action scenes, and a good mix of character and pathos. It's also really well shot, and the music is fine, but it bugs me that there's no AC/DC. The post credits stinger, and the retro-inspired end credits montage make for a really nice icing on an already delicious cake.
The performances are pretty terrific, and I really legitimately think that RDJ should be given some awards consideration. Paltrow and Cheadle are both getting better and more comfortable with their characters, and Ben Kingsley is a scene stealer. Guy Pearce is quite menacing, and I like how they got Miguel Ferrer and William Sadler, even if they underused them (along with Rebecca Hall).
All in all, this might not match the level of epic that The Avengers did, but it's nevertheless a very worthy film, and, while it may not be quite as good as the first one, it proves better than the second.
Super Reviewer
Super Reviewer
Super Reviewer
Super Reviewer
Super Reviewer
Super Reviewer
Super Reviewer
If there's one thing these Iron Man films have in common, it's that Tony Stark has been more interesting outside of the armor than in it, and the build up to the big, computer-effects driven fight scenes is more entertaining the the fight scenes themselves. This, perhaps more than anything, exemplifies "Iron Man 3", where the climactic battle is a little underwhelming when compared to the journey to that point. Well, there's another thing these Iron Man films have in common (so it's two things), and that's humor. This might be the funniest and fun-est of the three films, and there are several "wtf" moments where it's clear this film doesn't take itself very seriously (as opposed to something like, I don't know... "The Dark Knight Rises"). And really, I have to think Mandarin is a little jab at Bane, and the Dark Knight Rises in general. Look, you liked Iron Man and Iron Man 2, you will probably like Iron Man 3. There aren't any major deviations from the others. It's a good, fun action movie.
Super Reviewer
