John Carpenter's Ghosts of Mars (2001)
Critic Consensus: John Carpenter's Ghosts of Mars is not one of Carpenter's better movies, filled as it is with bad dialogue, bad acting, confusing flashbacks, and scenes that are more campy than scary.
Watch it now
as James `Desolation' W...
as Helena Bradock
as Bashira Kincaid
as Jericho Butler
as Michael Descanso
as Dr. Arlene Whitlock
as Big Daddy Mars
as Man in Rover
as Big Warrior
as Woman Warrior
as Young Woman
as Shape-Male Intern
as Local Lady Cop
News & Interviews for John Carpenter's Ghosts of Mars
Critic Reviews for John Carpenter's Ghosts of Mars
Written, directed, and edited with the offhand shoddiness of a day worker thinking about his evening beer.
A rather sturdy modernized mash-up of Assault on Precinct 13 and Escape from New York.
Mad Max Heads for the Angry Red Planet on a Pitch Black Night of the Living Dead.
Ghosts of Mars is not Carpenter at his best. It may very well be Carpenter at rock bottom.
Audience Reviews for John Carpenter's Ghosts of Mars
Yep back near the millennium there was a bit of a Mars movie rush. Alongside a couple other action thrillers earlier in 2000 this horror thriller was obviously a more fantasy based trip to the red planet courtesy of John Carpenter.
You know its Carpenter straight away with most of his films but this was different. For a start the soundtrack was a lot of actual heavy metal performers playing pieces created by Carpenter. So yes the tunes are all Carpenters work as usual but it just didn't have the cool quirky simple electronic vibes you associate with his films. The heavy metal stuff just feels too errr...heavy for what the film is, it tries to force the action and gore upon you with loud thrashing music which just seems childish really.
Naturally with Carpenter it looks cheap, everything is normally basic but created well with clever lighting, camera angles and editing. In this there is none of that craftsmanship, it really does feel as if John has sold out and given us a loud cliched straight to DVD action flick with no real thought or imagination. Everything also looks really really poor, terrible sets, terrible effects and makeup work and why are the good guys all wearing ski masks?. You can virtually see the edge of the sets half the time, we are talking TV movie standards here people!.
The plot is completely lame lets be honest, in fact it just feels like 'The Fog' but set on Mars or in space. That red dusty alien spirit cloud that goes around infecting the miners? come on John!. On top of that its all just a basic crappy zombie-ish horror theme. Humans are turned into mindless zombies that like to mutilate themselves and cut peoples heads off, errr gee...like wow!.
Its a shame because the cast is pretty cool with good names. A very young slim looking Statham with a bit of fuzz left on his bonce, Grier who is always sultry n sexy (why does she have to buy the farm so soon John!?) and Henstridge does add a 'Ripley-ish' current but personally I would of cast someone else. Yes 'Ice Cube' is there too being ridiculously over the top trying to make us all think he's a rough tough gangsta' in space, when will you grow up and use your real name Jesus!.
All together this really does feel like a rehash of previous thrillers 'The Fog' and 'Assault on Precinct 13' all mixed into one. Completely inept in every area, very cheap looking and totally un-thrilling in any way, how Carpenter produced such a generic piece of crapola like this I don't know. You only have to look at the space zombie bad guys to see how poor it is, looks like the makeup was applied by themselves and thought up by teenagers.
I wish I could somehow demonstrate how shockingly awful this movie was. I was constantly stricken with the face of a man walking in on a dog on chicken orgy. It happens! Anyway, Carpenter has always made B-Movies, but he often adds charm or intense sequences that bring them above the bar. Escape From New York looks dated today, but that is 30 years old. This is only a decade old and yet it looks like a huge steaming pile of crap. That's not the worst of it. I could easily forgive Carpenter's cheap looking visuals if the film was interesting or not a complete mess. The film has Natasha Henstridge recounting the events of a mission to transport a criminal. However, Carpenter doesn't just want to tell her story and finds himself trapped by a first person narrative. So then he has Henstridge recount certain events that other characters told her happened, and then ... well, it goes on and on. Recounts within flashbacks, all told with what seems to be a constant cross-fade. It's like Inception, only here it is genuinely confusing. The action is dull, the sets are small and uninspired, and the acting isn't worthy of that title. Only Statham seems to be giving it some effort, but he is simply forgotten about once the so called action starts. Add to this inexplicable character moments that mostly involve watching events and not taking action. It's worse than you could possibly imagine. The music is also inexplicable, with unnecessary crunching metal riffs that spoil every scene, at least they would if there was anything left to spoil. The unending transitions have left me cross-eyed. Damn you Ghosts Of Mars.
Discuss John Carpenter's Ghosts of Mars on our Movie forum!