King of New York

Audience Reviews

View More

Stoner J. @Stoner May 18 As most of the hood movies of the late 80s, early 90s, the actors aren’t believable in their roles. Larry Fishburne in particular is the biggest over actor I’ve ever seen in a movie. It has a good ending though. Deep Cover is much better. See more A B @Wilbur130 May 13 A really dumb 1980ish shoot ‘em up with long, boring film work, bad dialogue and bad writing. And I usually like Christopher Walken. Avoid See more PJ N @RT83107588 Apr 18 Frank White dancing to Schoolly D all-time great 10 seconds of film. Fishburne cackling under the bridge. Instant memes. Cops didn't qual criminals in bravura here and presence. See more Movie D. @themoviedad Feb 17 If you’re looking for in depth character development in a film, move on. If you want fun, shoot em up, action - press play. I sometimes ridicule movies nowadays on how they are 2-3 hours long and how they work so hard to develop characters before the film really picks up. This one, I wish, did a bit more of that. But, for what it is, it was fun. Not too much storyline to follow, a couple twists and turns to keep you on your toes but all in all just a fun shoot em up gangster flick. See more TWMax65 @RT38199094 Dec 28 The gang violence, some of the dialogue, and the more tense scenes/kills are what make the movie entertaining. Sure one can say that it lacks some depth and character development and I do recognize that, but I actually personally liked watching this movie! Christopher Walken is a legend on screen no matter what kind of movie he’s in! See more Eric B @RT25702656 Sep 29 Worst movie I've seen in years, no plot, no character arc, meaningless symbolism, no suspense. Proves to show some scripts cannot be saved even by an a list cast. I watched Christopher Walken stare into the blankness multiple times as if thinking why did I agree to this film, and I felt it with him. See more Read all reviews

King of New York

My Rating

Read More Read Less WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW POST RATING