Average Rating: 4.1/10
Reviews Counted: 110
Fresh: 27 | Rotten: 83
Beauty only goes skin deep in this shallow but visually stunning film.
Average Rating: 3.9/10
Critic Reviews: 27
Fresh: 4 | Rotten: 23
Beauty only goes skin deep in this shallow but visually stunning film.
liked it
Average Rating: 2.6/5
User Ratings: 51,383
Brian De Palma directed this science-fiction suspense story. When the United States sends its first manned mission to Mars, hopes are high for new scientific discoveries, but many of those hopes are dashed when the Mars crew meets an unexplained disaster; three members of the mission are killed, and a fourth (Don Cheadle) loses all radio contact with the Earth. A rescue mission sets out to bring back the one survivor; in the process, they discover that Mars may not be a dead planet after all,
PG, 1 hr. 52 min.
Mar 10, 2000 Wide
Jun 4, 2002
Touchstone Pictures
All Critics (126) | Top Critics (31) | Fresh (28) | Rotten (83) | DVD (12)
Despite a few breathtaking snapshots en route, it can't quite figure out the aesthetic itinerary -- where it's heading and why.
Mission to Mars is blandly directed by Brian De Palma.
Mission to Mars is sentimental, corny, and at times irredeemably campy.
On so many levels, a risibly bad movie.
De Palma can still use a camera, but he no longer seems to be using his head.
A movie as cold and distant as the Red Planet itself.
So-so sci-fi; may be too intense for some kids.
Whatever's shoddy or limp about Mission to Mars, however conspicuous while the film unfolds, all becomes admirably pale as the full viewing experience recedes and the good stuff emerges in proud bas-relief.
Mission to Mars' redemptive coda opened the door for the subsequent film's continuing figurative and literal sanguinity.
The race for the worst movie of the year is on!
Typically, while a good screenplay only requires a single author, this unimaginative, derivative dreck required at least four, even with the massive cribbing from 2001: A Space Odyssey.
There's some throwaway fancy camerawork at the beginning and a repeat of his shock-shot trick from Raising Cain, but otherwise De Palma's own ride appears to be largely on autopilot.
The too-many-cooks rule applies to this script, which borrows wantonly from sci-fi classics of the past.
If Brian DePalma's Mission to Mars were a book, it would have a yellow cover and the title '2001 for Dummies.'
It's the waste of the impressive ensemble cast on cheap, pedestrian dialogue and a tabloid-style hypothesis of Martian civilization that makes this Mission impossible to watch.
An interplanetary mission is launched to the red planet to discover the fate of an scientific team stationed there. Directorial hack Brian DePalma once again cack-handedly fails to conjure any sense of wonder or tension in this half arsed space adventure that's all dry techno babble at the start, giving way to
March 12, 2007
Super Reviewer
With a better budget and access to special effects, it would have been a great film. However, I donâ??t think weâ??ll ever get to see what Brian De Palma envisioned when he started working on this project. The performances are really what make it a compelling and interesting space movie, but itâ??s just a visual
December 9, 2009Super Reviewer
| 35% | The Hangover Part II |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 81% | Kung Fu Panda 2 |
| 44% | Cowboys & Aliens |
| 83% | Rise of the Planet of the Apes |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 88% | Lady and the Tramp |
| 69% | A Very Harold & Kumar Christmas |
| 21% | Fireflies in the Garden |
| 45% | The Rebound |
Twilight: Breaking Dawn Part 1
Woman in Black is Solid
Five new Marvelous pictures
Unconventional Superheroes