Narcosys (2000)
Release Date: Jan 1, 2000 Wide
liked it
Average Rating: 1.7/5
User Ratings: 81
My Rating
Movie Info
Set in the gritty future, Narcosys finds the world's population enslaved by a corporation called IT. Through the use of mass-produced pharmaceuticals, they have gained control of nearly everyone, but in order to ensure complete compliance, they are attempting to infect all street drugs with a virus that will create total submission. A gang of cyber-punks is still hawking uncontaminated drugs, however, and now it's a race against time and a struggle between rebellion and the authoritarian state.
Jan 1, 2000 Wide
Sep 30, 2003
Vanguard
Cast
ADVERTISEMENT
Narcosys Trailer & Photos
All Critics (1) | Fresh (0) | Rotten (1) | DVD (1)
Somewhere between The Matrix and a home video of a game of Laser Tag
Audience Reviews for Narcosys
Discussion Forum
There are no discussion threads for Narcosys yet.
What's Hot On RT
Trailer for James Franco adaptation
Star Trek opens softer than expected
Rachel McAdams' time travel romantic drama
Trailer for Tom Hanks thriller
Featured on RT
- Box Office Guru Wrapup: Star Trek Softer Than Expected at #1 52
- Weekly Ketchup: Will Smith to Star in Wild Bunch Remake? 36
- Critics Consensus: Star Trek Into Darkness is Certified Fresh 105
- Red Carpet Roundup: Star Trek Into Darkness Edition 0
- Video Interviews with Katie Aselton & Lake Bell of Black Rock 2
- VIP Access: Eli Roth talks Aftershock 1
- Total Recall: Star Trek Movies 95
Top Headlines
-
J.J. Abrams Talks Star Trek Into Darkness, Star Wars, and More
1
-
Vin Diesel Says Fast & Furious 7 Will Begin a New Trilogy
9
-
Mickey Rourke Confirmed for Expendables 3
5
-
Brad Bird Still Mulling Incredibles 2
0
-
Reese Witherspoon, Jena Malone, and Martin Short Join Inherent Vice
1
-
Bruce Willis Makes an Expiration Date
4
-
Drew Pearce Hired for Mission: Impossible 5
0


[size=3][font=Book Antiqua][color=red] So, when you pick up a movie produced in Australia, you can bet your bottom dollar it?ll be full of ass-less chaps, transvestites, and midgets riding retards. But more than anything, you can expect to hear the English language butchered in ways you can?t even imagine. Yes, it?s even worse than the American South. So when I picked up an Australian [i]indie[/i] movie, God help me, I knew I was going to pound my head into something hard and blunt before everything was over.[/color][/font][/size]
[size=3][font=Book Antiqua][color=red] I?ll get this out of the way now, because if you?re ever unfortunate enough to fucking pick up ?Narcosys?, you won?t be able to avoid it. This movie contains, swear to God, some of the worst dialogue known to mankind. And it doesn?t even have anything to do with their accent; the screenplay itself is a document so revolting it could actually be used as a first aid vomit-inducing device. I went through half the movie scratching my head and wondering how [i]not one fucking person associated with this movie realized that the screenplay was not in any sense legible[/i], when I stumbled upon a sobering conclusion. This movie must have been written, directed, acted, edited, and produced by Australia?s schizophrenic population, and that the screenplay was nothing but a gigantic word salad. Yes, when I came to the conclusion that these poor, poor people were not mentally retarded, simply disturbed, it really opened up my eyes.[/color][/font][/size]
[size=3][font=Book Antiqua][color=red] So I decided I should take it easy on these guys. I mean, it?s not really their fault that the CG on display is not only bad for a freshman digital art student, and is laughably overused. I mean, what modicum of professionalism can I expect from these people, considering their lives are filled with more important struggles than producing at least a half-assed, or even quarter-assed, product for which they?re paid. And noticing the almost total lack of extras on set, I?d have to say that a total and utter lack of talent is only one of the many reasons why the CG in this movie sucks to such an egregious degree. Think bad Playstation 1 graphics?hell, think Sega Saturn graphics. Yes, I said it.[/color][/font][/size]
[size=3][font=Book Antiqua][color=red] And of course, there are the actors, what review of a sub-par indie movie would be complete without them? Wooden is a generous description; I would equate their performances with marble, or possibly granite. Not one iota of passion is given in their performances, which of course makes the awkward sex scenes even less titillating than they have to be. Not that they?re surrounded by talent, and the script would suck the will to live out of even the most experienced thespians, but there?s no excuse for how god-awful the deliver is in this movie.[/color][/font][/size]
[size=3][font=Book Antiqua][color=red] Oh, and there?s a scene at a rave, and in my opinion, the only need to film a rave is if a hulking maniac is going to flay everything in its path with a flaming machete. That?s just one of the reasons why ?Freddy versus Jason? is a better movie than this one, but it?s a fairly significant reason in my mind. The movie tries so hard to be disturbing in a Cronenberg-esque kind of way, but if you have a character named Sintax, you?re not going to make up enough ground with a poorly done ?man-giving-birth? scene. The only way this movie could possibly redeem itself was to torture it?s lead characters for at least forty-five minutes, but sadly writer Adam Breasley didn?t have the fucking nads to do this, so, fuck him to.[/color][/font][/size]
[size=3][font=Book Antiqua][color=red] To say that ?Narcosys? is one of the worst sci-fi movies of all time is like saying the Bubonic Plague was a ?nasty bug?. It?s really one of the movies that goes from ?bad?, down to ?funny bad?, a down one more notch to ?just really, really bad?. When you look back at it, campy fun was all this movie had to hope for, but they decided to take themselves WAY too seriously and managed to ruin any fun you could have with this movie in the process.[/color][/font][/size]
[font=Book Antiqua][color=red][/color][/font]