A Nightmare on Elm Street Reviews

Page 2 of 9
Cris Kennedy
Screenwize
July 4, 2010
In this outing, however, Wesley Strick and Eric Heisserer's screenplay pulls no punches about Freddy's vicious sadism and paedophilia and, seriously, there's no fun in that.
| Original Score: 1.5/5
Dragan Antulov
Draxblog Movie Reviews
May 25, 2010
Lo%u0161e odra%u0111ena indigo-kopija originala, od strane ne ba%u0161 iskusnog videospota%u0161a Samuela Bayera
Full Review | Original Score: 2/10
David Nusair
Reel Film Reviews
May 23, 2010
An expectedly worthless horror-movie remake from Michael Bay's production company...
Full Review | Original Score: 1.5/4
Jake Wilson
The Age (Australia)
May 21, 2010
Compared to the flamboyance of Robert Englund in the 1980s, Jackie Earle Haley as the crazed Freddy Krueger is more lumbering man-child than demonic daddy.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/5
Glenn Dunks
Trespass
May 21, 2010
This trip to Elm Street will give you nightmares, but not the kind they anticipated.
Nigel Floyd
Time Out Sydney
May 21, 2010
This is the worst yet from Michael Bay's horror production company Platinum Dunes, which also brought you rubbish re-makes of Halloween and Friday the 13th.
Full Review | Original Score: 1/5
Chris Bumbray
JoBlo's Movie Emporium
May 21, 2010
Only a NIGHTMARE for fans of the franchise.
Full Review | Original Score: 3/10
Jim Lane
Sacramento News & Review
May 20, 2010
Is there any movie franchise that cries out less for revisiting than A Nightmare on Elm Street?
Full Review | Original Score: 2/5
Patrick Kolan
IGN Movies AU
May 20, 2010
It's not a good film, but if you're feeling jaded and just want to watch a demonic killer pound his fist through the chest of some hapless, cardboard teenager, then this might just scratch that itch.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/5
May 18, 2010
Do not, let me repeat that, DO NOT, watch the new A Nightmare on Elm Street.
Full Review | Original Score: 1/5
Paul Chambers
CNNRadio
May 14, 2010
After giving a great performance in "Watchmen," what was Jackie Earle Haley doing in this film, besides making a buck or two? Extremely disappointing remake and creepier than the original, but not in a good way. Paul Chambers, CNN.
Full Review | Original Score: D
Top Critic
Peter Travers
Rolling Stone
May 14, 2010
It's the Bay touch you feel in the way actors register as body count, characters go undeveloped, and sensation trumps feeling. A nightmare, indeed.
Full Review | Original Score: 1.5/4
James Kendrick
Q Network Film Desk
May 14, 2010
its primary effect is to leave you less thrilled than simply asking what's the point in remaking something if you can't improve on the original?
Full Review | Original Score: 2/4
Derek Malcolm
This is London
May 13, 2010
To call the film patterned to fit would be a blazing understatement.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/5
Charles Koplinski
Illinois Times
May 12, 2010
A recurring Nightmare.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.0/4.0
Richard Knight
Windy City Times
May 11, 2010
A bland, unncessary return to Freddyland
Allan Hunter
Daily Express
May 10, 2010
It's all efficiently done and gory but director Samuel Bayer adds so little to the old familiar scare story that you wonder why they didn't just save a bob or two and reissue the Robert Englund original.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/5
May 10, 2010
Though no worse than the raft of terrible Elm Street sequels, this remake misses some of the surreal and anarchic low-budget energy Craven brought to his film (not to mention Johnny Depp).
Full Review | Original Score: 2/5
Wesley Lovell
Cinema Sight
May 9, 2010
The nightmare on Elm Street is not how scary (or not) the film is, but how it destroys the franchise.
Full Review | Original Score: 1/4
Rob Gonsalves
eFilmCritic.com
May 8, 2010
Photocopies much of Wes Craven's original 1984 classic, but makes senseless changes that destroy the story's night-terror integrity.
Full Review | Original Score: 1/5
Page 2 of 9