Average Rating: 7.6/10
Reviews Counted: 35
Fresh: 33 | Rotten: 2
Stunning visuals from Werner Herzog and an intense portrayal of the famed bloodsucker from Klaus Kinski make this remake of Nosferatu a horror classic in its own right.
Average Rating: N/A
Critic Reviews: 4
Fresh: 4 | Rotten: 0
Stunning visuals from Werner Herzog and an intense portrayal of the famed bloodsucker from Klaus Kinski make this remake of Nosferatu a horror classic in its own right.
liked it
Average Rating: 3.7/5
User Ratings: 18,991
For Werner Herzog's 1979 remake of F.W. Murnau's classic 1922 silent horror-fest Nosferatu, star Klaus Kinski adopts the same makeup style used by Murnau's leading man Max Schreck. Yet in the Herzog version, the crucial difference is that Nosferatu becomes more and more decayed and desiccated as the film progresses. Essentially a retelling of Bram Stoker's Dracula, Nosferatu the Vampyre traces the blood-sucking progress of the count as he takes over a small German village, then attempts to
Jan 17, 1979 Wide
Feb 16, 1999
20th Century Fox
All Critics (36) | Top Critics (5) | Fresh (37) | Rotten (2) | DVD (16)
Between the hordes of stowaway rats that accompany Dracula's arrival, and a town-plaza dance of folly by doomed survivors (a Herzog addition), it's like being present at the birth of a medieval legend.
The acting is too eccentric and the narrative drive too weak to satisfy fans of the genre, but Herzog's admirers will find much in the film's animistic landscapes and clusters of visionary imagery.
It's funny without being silly, eerie without being foolish and uncommonly beautiful in a way that has nothing to do with mere prettiness.
Nosferatu the Vampyre may not be scary in a traditional sense, but it is not easily forgotten.
Herzog tears down as much as he revives in this beguiling incantation of silent cinema
Replaces unnerving gore with an eerie, erotic beauty.
Werner Herzog's 1979 homage to F.W. Murnau's 1922 silent film is an appropriately chilling telling of the Gothic tale filled with delightfully scary touches and recreated camera angles from Murnau's original.
Sometimes dismissed for being too slowly paced and too slavish to its source, it is in fact superior to the original.
You can love this movie without having to admit it's merely an okay version of Dracula.
A serious-minded, true-in-spirit redux.
It is a simple and well-known story but sadly this version overcomplicates it to its detriment.
Sumptuous yet earthy, philosophical yet humorous, it's a masterpiece in its own right.
A competent, atmospheric remake, but, considering the quality of Murnau's masterwork, is it necessary?
Herzog and Kinski succeed here because they convey a sense of pity for a creature so visually repulsive it's hard to look at him.
Fascinating, but flawed.
The film's reason for being (it's a shrine to Herzog's favourite German director) is also the end of the conversation.
A remake of the silent classic courtesy of director Werner Herzog. It is very slow and some may find it boring, but the dark creepy atmosphere is constant and Klaus Kinski is great in the lead role as the Vampire. It's not a blood drenched film, but if you're in the mood for something a little slow paced and
January 9, 2011
Super Reviewer
A remake of the classic 20s film. It's pretty good, but I'd rather watch the original.
September 6, 2010Super Reviewer
| 35% | The Hangover Part II |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 81% | Kung Fu Panda 2 |
| 44% | Cowboys & Aliens |
| 83% | Rise of the Planet of the Apes |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 88% | Lady and the Tramp |
| 69% | A Very Harold & Kumar Christmas |
| 21% | Fireflies in the Garden |
| 45% | The Rebound |
Journey 2 Not Worth the Trip
What are his 10 best movies ever?
See the all-new action-packed trailer!
Five new Marvelous pictures