On Her Majesty's Secret Service Reviews

Page 1 of 3
Emanuel Levy
EmanuelLevy.Com
December 2, 2012
Artistically, Bond's sixth entry, the only one to star Aussie George Lazenby, is much better than given credit to, though commercially it was one of the weakest.
Full Review | Original Score: B+

Total Film
October 23, 2012
[Concentrates] more on the man than the equipment.
Full Review | Original Score: 4/5
Austin Kennedy
Sin Magazine
October 21, 2012
Besides not being a terribly good Bond entry, it's also a poorly made film.
Full Review | Original Score: 1.5/4
Nick Rogers
Suite101.com
August 10, 2012
An odd interruption in the Bond canon that's neither an unsung masterpiece nor an unmitigated disaster. It's half terrific, half terrible -the former most often when George Lazenby shuts up and Peter Hunt's masterful action instincts take over.
Full Review | Original Score: 3.5/5
Tim Brayton
Antagony & Ecstasy
July 7, 2012
Even hobbled as he is by a character he doesn't entirely get, and Peter Hunt's antagonistic direction, and the film's annoying tendency to remind us of Connery... George azenby puts up a good fight.
Full Review | Original Score: 8/10
Charles Cassady
Common Sense Media
December 15, 2010
007 in ski country -- and marriage territory?
Full Review | Original Score: 3/5
Dennis Schwartz
Ozus' World Movie Reviews
February 22, 2009
Just as entertaining and as visually attractive as the five previous Bond films.
Full Review | Original Score: B-
Top Critic
Variety Staff
Variety
October 13, 2008
Film of break-neck physical excitement and stunning visual attractions in which George Lazenby replaced Sean Connery as James Bond.
Top Critic
Don Druker
Chicago Reader
October 13, 2008
Director Peter Hunt manages to inject some life into this 1969 exercise with a wonderful ski chase, but otherwise the film is a bore.

Film4
October 13, 2008
Ditching flash in favour of character development, this stylish and energetic entry is one of the best films in the series. Lazenby woz robbed.

Empire Magazine
October 13, 2008
Certainly no worse than the later Roger Moore efforts and, if only for curiosity value, is well worth a look.
Full Review | Original Score: 4/5

TV Guide's Movie Guide
October 13, 2008
One of the more entertaining Bond films.
Full Review | Original Score: 3.5/4
February 7, 2008
Lazenby is very weak, but the movie is rather good
| Original Score: 3/4
Steve Crum
Video-Reviewmaster.com
July 13, 2007
Lazenby isn't all that bad, really. Top Bond production overall helps.
| Original Score: 4/5
January 31, 2007
Mémorable pour ses excès beaucoup plus que sa pertinence scénaristique
Full Review | Original Score: 7/10
Christopher Null
Filmcritic.com
January 11, 2007
George Lazenby took Bond's reins from Sean Connery in this sixth 007 outing, an unfairly oft-maligned film that, while distinctively different than the rest of the series, is still quite fun to watch.
Full Review | Original Score: 3.5/5
Top Critic
Geoff Andrew
Time Out
June 24, 2006
The Bond films were bad enough even with the partially ironic performances of Connery.
Rob Vaux
Flipside Movie Emporium
December 9, 2005
It's ironic that this, perhaps the weakest Bond film, contains the character's most important piece of development.
| Original Score: 2/5
Top Critic
A.H. Weiler
New York Times
May 9, 2005
What are Bond's problems now? They're too numerous, as usual, to hold the constant attention of anyone other than a charter member of Her Majesty's Secret Service.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/5
Leo Goldsmith
Not Coming to a Theater Near You
March 22, 2005
The film is often unjustly treated as an odd footnote to the series, an awkward moment from the series' puberty that the producers would just as soon forget.
Page 1 of 3