Average Rating: 5/10
Reviews Counted: 61
Fresh: 23 | Rotten: 38
Schizophrenic in subject and lackluster in execution, Outlander might have trouble finding the cult audience for which it was built.
Average Rating: 4.8/10
Critic Reviews: 8
Fresh: 2 | Rotten: 6
Schizophrenic in subject and lackluster in execution, Outlander might have trouble finding the cult audience for which it was built.
liked it
Average Rating: 3.1/5
User Ratings: 45,071
When an extraterrestrial spaceship comes crashing down to Earth during the reign of the Vikings, the Scandinavian plunderers get set to do battle with a most unusual enemy in director Howard McCain's earthbound science fiction thriller. Jim Caviezel, Jack Huston, and Sophia Myles star in a film scripted by director McCain in collaboration with screenwriter Dirk Blackman. ~ Jason Buchanan, Rovi
Jan 23, 2009 Wide
May 26, 2009
$59.6k
Third Rail Releasing
All Critics (61) | Top Critics (8) | Fresh (23) | Rotten (38)
An unexpectedly enjoyable science-fiction adventure that should be generating louder fanboy buzz than it has so far.
Outlander is a cheesy, low-budget, space alien Viking monster movie. And seemingly proud of it.
In its second half, Outlander falls apart completely, becoming nothing but a violent, mindless monster movie along the lines of Alien vs. Predator.
In Outlander, the nuttiest hunk of junk in many months, Viking warriors and a stoic intergalactic traveler join forces to combat an enormous beetle with whiplash stingers.
By taking nonsense seriously Outlander never achieves camp. It's a comic book that's mistaken itself for scripture.
An enjoyably goofy hybrid of extraterrestrial sci-fi and Iron Age action.
Beowulf with aliens and lots of gore, violence.
Outlander is a fluid genre exercise that satisfies cravings for action and Norse mythology in one fell swoop. It's a full-bodied adventure movie that's responsive and reverential to the needs of sci-fi escapism.
Vikings vs. aliens -- Outlander is probably the best possible version of whatever movie you've already made in your head from reading those first three words.
A mead hall party feels like a Iron Age version of "Cheers," right down to the "Norm!" greeting for one character. It's one of many leaden diversions from what should be a lean, economical, brutal B-movie of aliens, Vikings and alternate timelines.
This is honestly better than all the big Hollywood blockbusters that have been released so far this summer.
...ultimately establishes itself as a fun little endeavor that boasts as irresistible a premise as one could possibly imagine.
About as subtle as being punched in the face by an angry Norwegian, it delivers everything you could possibly want from a movie about Vikings and alien monsters.
Outlander is a perfectly acceptable mashup of "Alien," "Predator" and just about every Viking flick you've ever seen.
Most of the time, though, Howard McCain's movie is plain dull.
The creature is about as convincing as a furry dragon carried through Chinatown.
Stunning special effects and bloody battle sequences make it just the ticket for a popcorn monster fantasy. If you want to engage your brain, best avoid.
As clunky and ineffective as an iron-age weapon on an alien predator's hide, this retro-SF rationalisation of Beowulf could have done with less sword and more pen.
With plenty of spattered blood and gore and some nice homages to the Beowulf tale the movie isn't without thrills, though its conceptual ambitions are rarely fulfilled in their execution.
Outlandish would have been a better title for a film that's great fun and quite exciting before eventually outstaying its welcome.
A film version of fish and chips - humble, honest fare that's ludicrous, inventive, gory within limits, and has a cast having so much fun it's hard not to be swept along with them. And besides, you can't have nouvelle cuisine every night of the week.
Daft, obvious but hugely enjoyable, 'Outlander' is superior trash.
Sadly, the kooky premise of Outlander solidifies quickly into formula: monster is fought, fair maiden won, kingship gained and past errors redeemed with no real surprises along the way.
We are now deep, deep, deep into nerd territory, so deep you will get a nosebleed in your diving suit.
As the ginger offspring of a Ridley Scott/Peter Jackson gangbang, Outlander is a wannabe B movie classic that's so shit, it's just... shit!
This movie got little advertisement when it was released in 2009 and thus ended up heading to DVD in a hurry. The box office on this shouldnt scare you. I just watched the blu ray and I must say not a bad little film. John Hurt as always is awesome. I love me some Sophia Myles. Ron Perlman gets a bit part. Just a nice
June 11, 2010Super Reviewer
Taking a strong lead from 'Alien 3' and 'The Relic' methinks with this one, quite a good action flick none the less but it starts out quite drab and lifeless with little on offer.The cast is lifted with the presence of Hurt and Caviezel is strong as the hero but the rest of the cast can't really compare and come across
September 26, 2011Super Reviewer
| 35% | The Hangover Part II |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 81% | Kung Fu Panda 2 |
| 44% | Cowboys & Aliens |
| 83% | Rise of the Planet of the Apes |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 88% | Lady and the Tramp |
| 69% | A Very Harold & Kumar Christmas |
| 21% | Fireflies in the Garden |
| 45% | The Rebound |
What are his 10 best movies ever?
See the all-new action-packed trailer!
Five new Marvelous pictures
Unconventional Superheroes