Average Rating: 5.9/10
Reviews Counted: 24
Fresh: 16 | Rotten: 8
There is no middle ground for viewers of Peter Greenaway's work, but for his fans, Prospero's Books is reliably daring.
Average Rating: 5.3/10
Critic Reviews: 7
Fresh: 4 | Rotten: 3
There is no middle ground for viewers of Peter Greenaway's work, but for his fans, Prospero's Books is reliably daring.
liked it
Average Rating: 3.9/5
User Ratings: 3,793
Puzzle-master Peter Greenaway exposes another aspect of his peculiar obsessions to the filmgoing public. Prospero's Books uses Shakespeare as a foundation and then skips along to define its own lush territory. The books of the title are briefly referenced in The Tempest -- Prospero is a magician who gets to keep only a small fragment of his enormous library when he is exiled with his daughter to an enchanted island. In the film, Prospero is played by Sir John Gielgud. Indeed, everybody is voiced
R, 2 hr. 9 min.
Sep 28, 1991 Wide
Oct 22, 1992
All Critics (24) | Top Critics (7) | Fresh (16) | Rotten (8)
The product of a feverish, overflowing imagination, this almost impossibly dense take on The Tempest displays both the director's audacious brilliance and lewd extravagance at full tilt.
Gone is any sense of drama or character; the cluttered spectacle yields no overriding design but simply disconnected MTV-like conceits or mini-ideas every three seconds.
Greenaway is not a frivolous film maker. He doesn't shoot a lot of material with the expectation of stumbling upon a found object within. His films are planned from the first frame to the last.
Greenaway bombards you with images, with no regard for the average attention span. Is he a genius or a fake? Debating that question is almost as stimulating as watching a Greenaway film.
Prospero's Books references the masterpieces of the past in a manner that antagonizes our pleasure in the arts rather than enhancing it.
Ravishing but incomprehensible.
Does it work? That depends on whether you find Greenaway's elaborate visual conceits and rarified narrative structures daring and liberating, or boringly self-indulgent.
Lubricious biblophilia rubbing up against a warehouse of naked extras, this Shakespearean adaptation is, in many ways, the epitome of cinematic pretension.
It cries out to not only be heard but be seen for what it wishes to convey about the act of creativity.
To some degree, the relentless proliferation of ideas smothers the dramatic highs and lows, but this is a minor quibble compared to the sheer ambition and audacity of the overall conception.
Gielgud's voice has the ability to put you right to sleep with its bass and monotone timbre. The good news is that when you wake up, you won't have missed a thing.
There's nothing quite like it in all of cinema -- and that's either a very good thing, or a very perplexing one, depending on how you feel about Greenaway's work.
This is a fantasy film that does a great deal that is new but one I cannot recommend without strong reservations.
It's not concerned with anything but being hypnotic and using film's plastic elements to its extremes, or at least as far as Greenaway can take it.
It is a great Movie, what is wrong with you guys?
December 11, 2009
Super Reviewer
Greenaway brings his pattened style to this tale set in Machievelli's Milan. The visuals are quite compelling but the story drags in places. The theatrical side of the director just could not say no to monologues from Gielgud.
January 15, 2009
| 35% | The Hangover Part II |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 81% | Kung Fu Panda 2 |
| 44% | Cowboys & Aliens |
| 83% | Rise of the Planet of the Apes |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 88% | Lady and the Tramp |
| 69% | A Very Harold & Kumar Christmas |
| 21% | Fireflies in the Garden |
| 45% | The Rebound |
Journey 2 Not Worth the Trip
What are his 10 best movies ever?
See the all-new action-packed trailer!
Five new Marvelous pictures