Average Rating: 6.2/10
Reviews Counted: 244
Fresh: 154 | Rotten: 90
Though there are more characters and plotlines, and the action sequences still dazzle, Spider-Man 3 nonetheless isn't quite as refined as the first two.
Average Rating: 5.4/10
Critic Reviews: 46
Fresh: 19 | Rotten: 27
Though there are more characters and plotlines, and the action sequences still dazzle, Spider-Man 3 nonetheless isn't quite as refined as the first two.
liked it
Average Rating: 3.3/5
User Ratings: 2,076,446
Your friendly neighborhood web-slinger is back, only this time his sunny outlook has become partially overcast in the third chapter of director Sam Raimi's Spider-Man saga. Tobey Maguire, Kirsten Dunst, and James Franco return to reprise their roles from the previous two installments, with Thomas Haden Church, Topher Grace, and Bryce Dallas Howard making their first appearances in the series as Flint Marko (aka Sandman), Eddie Brock (aka Venom), and Gwen Stacy, respectively. Peter Parker
PG-13, 2 hr. 7 min.
Action & Adventure, Mystery & Suspense, Science Fiction & Fantasy
May 4, 2007 Wide
Oct 30, 2007
$336.5M
Sony Pictures
All Critics (244) | Top Critics (46) | Fresh (159) | Rotten (92) | DVD (23)
At 141 minutes, this supe-opera is seriously overextended, with four distinct subplots and way too much hand-wringing over things like the heroine's singing career.
Too many villains, too many pale plot strands, too many romantic misunderstandings, too many conversations, too many street crowds looking high into the air and shouting "oooh!" this way, then swiveling and shouting "aaah!" that way.
Raimi at least manages to make it both huge and human.
After two epic successes that deserved their success, the latest installment swings between intense action sequences and unaccountably flat dramatic interludes.
One has to consider that the film's problems -- and they are numerous -- may be the product of the franchise's runaway popularity.
If there's a moral to be gleaned from Spider-Man 3 -- aside from the fact that heavily promoted franchise movies tend to rake in megabucks -- it's this: Movies don't necessarily need to hit grand slams to score.
Spiderman 3 is best described as a Mexican soap opera with mind-blowing special effects.
It's hard to complain of having too much going on, and the film is certainly extremely well crafted, but it's too ambitious and never quite meets its goals.
Another third installment, another arrested adolescent gone wild
Sam Raimi and company should have ... made a movie and not an f/x tapas plate.
You know that the third Spider-Man had to be bigger. The third movie in a franchise goes for broke. And Spider-Man 3 is bigger, if not better. It's overdone, overlong, and overplotted. It's all over the place. This does not mean Spider-Man 3
It is like a buffet. You look at the cast and trailers and you just start drooling over all the options. But they just overdid it, stuffing you with filler, and the juicy part of the film didn't start until it was halfway through.
The third Spider_Man film is a bit like a web that's been hanging in a dusty corner for years: it's so weighted down with sticky bits and pieces of past detritus that it's in danger of being ripped apart by the new prey.
An everything-plus-the-kitchen-sink production that thrives on its boundless energy and the sheer audacity of its vision.
Spider-Man 3 is so burdened by the need to outshine its predecessors that it sinks beneath the weight of its own extravagant excesses.
Different in all the right ways-- a complex, unpredictable attempt at giving its audience a lot to chew on. Pardon those of us who will take a flawed opus over bloated unoriginality.
... it's way too much of a good thing, but director Sam Raimi manages to pack it all in and even provide some satisfying character closure.
Kids'll be dazzled, but story falls short of #2.
Spider-Man 3, i'm not going to lie, has tons of plot holes; However, I find this film extremely entertaining! Ever since I first laid eyes on this film in theatres I was hooked on all the cheesy CGI that they chose to throw in. I could watch this film over and over again, laughing at the random cast choices and acting,
January 10, 2010Super Reviewer
I often say in my reviews of superhero films that im not a big fan of them because they often suffer from a bad script, mindless action sequences, campy dialogue and no real reason to exist other than to steal your money. Spiderman 3 is a huge example of that.
November 1, 2011
Super Reviewer
| 35% | The Hangover Part II |
| 81% | Kung Fu Panda 2 |
| 44% | Cowboys & Aliens |
| 83% | Rise of the Planet of the Apes |
| 94% | Moneyball |
| 37% | In Time |
| 93% | Drive |
| 36% | The Thing |
| 7% | Dream House |
| 39% | The Big Year |
Adam Sandler's Candy Land
Woman in Black is Solid
Five new Marvelous pictures
Unconventional Superheroes