Star Trek: The Motion Picture (1979) - Rotten Tomatoes

Star Trek: The Motion Picture (1979)



Critic Consensus: No consensus yet.

Star Trek: The Motion Picture Trailers & Photos

Movie Info

When a destructive space entity is spotted approaching Earth, Admiral Kirk resumes command of the Starship Enterprise in order to intercept, examine and hopefully stop it.more
Rating: G (violence)
Genre: Action & Adventure, Mystery & Suspense, Science Fiction & Fantasy
Directed By:
Written By: Harold Livingston
In Theaters:
On DVD: Nov 6, 2001
Paramount Home Video


William Shatner
as Admiral James T. Kir...
Leonard Nimoy
as Mr. Spock
DeForest Kelley
as Dr. Leonard 'Bones' ...
James Doohan
as Cmdr. Montgomery 'Sc...
Stephen Collins
as Cmdr. Willard Decker
Majel Barrett
as Dr. Christine Chapel
Mark Lenard
as Klingon Captain
Billy Van Zandt
as Alien Boy
Grace Lee Whitney
as Janice Rand
Roger Aaron Brown
as Epsilon Technician
Gary Faga
as Airlock Technician
David Gautreaux
as Cmdr. Branch
John D. Gowans
as Assistant to Rand
Jon Rashad Kamal
as Ltd. Cmdr. Sonak
Howard Itzkowitz
as Cargo Deck Ensign
Marcy Lafferty
as Chief DiFalco
Jeri McBride
as Technician
Michael Rougas
as Lt. Cleary
Ralph Brannen
as Crew Member
Ralph Byers
as Crew Member
Paula Crist
as Crew Member
Franklyn Seales
as Crew Member
Momo Yashima
as Crew Member
Joel Kramer
as Klingon Crewman
Tom Morga
as Klingon Crewman
Paul Weber
as Vulcan Master
Ralph Byers
as Crew Member
Craig Thomas
as Klingon Crewman
Show More Cast

News & Interviews for Star Trek: The Motion Picture

Critic Reviews for Star Trek: The Motion Picture

All Critics (34) | Top Critics (7)

Nothing but a long day's journey into ennui.

Full Review… | May 3, 2009
TIME Magazine
Top Critic

The expensive effects (under supervision of Douglas Trumbull) are the secret of this film, and the amazing wizardry throughout would appear to justify the whopping budget.

Full Review… | May 19, 2008
Top Critic

This 1979 movie adaptation of the cult TV series is blandness raised to an epic scale.

Full Review… | May 19, 2008
Chicago Reader
Top Critic

For non-addicts, the smart plot and effects go some way towards compensating for the plastic characters and costumes.

Full Review… | August 16, 2007
Time Out
Top Critic

[It's] like attending your high-school class's 10th reunion at Caesar's Palace. Most of the faces are familiar, but the décor has little relationship to anything you've ever seen before.

Full Review… | May 9, 2005
New York Times
Top Critic

Merely a weak, inapt Star Trek movie, not a completely awful one.

Full Review… | May 20, 2013
Antagony & Ecstasy

Audience Reviews for Star Trek: The Motion Picture

The main problem with this first Star Trek film is that it is not at all original and looks more like a stretched TV episode that tries too hard to be 2001: A Space Odyssey, dragging endlessly in long, contemplative scenes that seem to exist only to show the higher budget.

Carlos Magalhães

Super Reviewer


To think this this film came out when I was just one year old, just like Star Wars which came out a year before I was born, makes me God Jim...I'm old!

I've never been a huge Star Trek fan and never will be in all honesty. I did always enjoy the films with the original classic crew but never got into any of the TV series, especially the new stuff. I always preferred the Star Wars franchise for many reasons but mainly because it always looked so superior in virtually every department. This first Trek movie really does show the difference between the two franchises which both appeared in the same era, not taking anything away from Star Trek but it always did look more fake and plastic looking.

The effects in this first movie are a mixed bag really. The sequences towards the finale inside V'Ger don't look too bad (nice 2001-esque fantasy lighting effects), various spaceship shots look nice throughout and the costumes although drab don't age too badly. For the most part this film has aged badly if we're brutally honest about it, I don't wanna keep comparing it to Star Wars but there is a clear difference in quality which still stands to this day.

What I did always like about Trek was the way it tries to be realistic or at least approach things in a realistic fashion. I'm Not sure if they are merely homaging or copying '2001' but you can clearly see the influences in one sequence as we are treated to a grandiose panorama of the [i]Enterprise[/i] as she sits in her docking bay accompanied by a stirring Trek instrumental score. This epic approach is a far cry from the flashbang blaster fire and roaring starcruisers of a certain George Lucas affair. Star Trek is definitely aiming at the grown-ups here, the real sci-fi enthusiasts who name Kubrick's space opus as their holy bible...which Wise clearly did too.

I do like the way Wise gave the film a slow pace. Lots of character and background building alongside plenty of mission dialog and technical problems that might occur in reality for such a scenario. Its all classic Star Trek as you would remember from the original series but on a sexier scale with props that actually do look kinda real. In fact there's even more politically correct...goody directive...Federation type babble than you can wave a stick at, and Shatner loves his speeches.

The film was criticised for this slow unadventurous style but personally I like it, its one of the more realistic Trek movies offering exactly what you got with the original TV series...but prettier. I still to this day don't really understand why some folk (even Trek fans) don't like it. The main aspect of this film I like is the plot, yes the plot. Seems straight forward enough as the team are sent to intercept a mysterious alien phenomena heading towards earth, but I liked how the plot has its intriguing twist at the end. Again just like the classic show you get the danger and mystery with a cute little twist to keep you on your toes. Its not groundbreaking but it just makes you think a little, right up to the very end you're unsure what the hell will happen. How Kirk will save the day and what's the deal behind the alien cloud thing, that's good story telling right there methinks.

The continuity from the TV show to the big screen was handled well I thought although I'm no Trek expert. You have all the crew doing what they are best at of course, some new crews members (redshirt fodder perhaps?), plenty of well known typical Trek visuals and sounds, the crew handle most of the action from the ships bridge via the good old big screen on the wall and the [i]Enterprise[/i] looks slick with a bit of spit n polish to tart it up for the big screen.

Sure its not an in your face phaser fest with hand to hand fights against large lizard men but I for one thought the serious route was a good way to go. The film is more of an exploration adventure, it takes its time, slowly builds up, lots of space don't know what their on about half the time but it just sounds good...I use my realism card again. It feels like a point n click strategic adventure game for your PC...I guess?

One of the oddest things when you think about it was the fact Wise directed this. You tend to remember Robert Wise for the Hollywood epics 'The Sound of Music' and 'West Side Story' which are two of the greatest musicals ever made probably. So its kinda funny to think he directed the first Star Trek movie, then again he did direct 'The Andromeda Strain' and 'The Day the Earth Stood Still' so he did have some good sci-fi experience.

Overall the special effects look fuzzy in places, lots of beige colour schemes going on with the ship and crew, plenty of nasty bluescreen evident I'm afraid...but its still very enjoyable sci-fi. Star Trek has its own little niche of being semi-serious and approaching everything logically but still utilising just enough fantasy to make it a charming pleasant ride.

Phil Hubbs

Super Reviewer

The first Star Trek film directed by Robert Wise manages to capture the vibe of the TV show and offer fans a good two hours of entertainment. Although, this film isn't a classic by any means, it's still enjoyable for what it is. There has been far better science fiction film, but this first film in the Star Trek franchise is quite good despite the fact that it does show its age. With this film, director Robert Wise crafts something entertaining, a film that has a good storyline, impressive performances and an effective mix of action and thrills. Fans of the show will surely enjoy this picture, and it's an effective continuation of what Gene Roddenberry accomplished with his show. I enjoyed this film, but like I said, it looks dated and the effects on-screen don't hold up too well. Nonetheless it's still an effective, entertaining Sci Fi film, one that should be seen by genre fans looking for a well constructed film. The sequel;, Wrath of Kahn would definitely improve on the elements that are lacking within the film, but as it is, Star Trek: The Motion Picture is entertaining from start to finish, but as a whole, it does leave a bit to be desired, which is what the follow up would improve upon. I must admit, I never was big into Star Trek, but I enjoyed this film and I felt that director Robert Wise, of whom I've enjoyed his previous work, is well suited to tackle this first big screen outing of the classic show. Despite the fact that I don't believe that this film is a genre classic, as it really didn't break new grounds in the genre, this film will surely appeal to viewers that are looking for a good Science Fiction film to watch.

Alex roy

Super Reviewer

Star Trek: The Motion Picture Quotes

– Submitted by Stefan G (2 years ago)
– Submitted by Brandon K (3 years ago)
– Submitted by Blair S (3 years ago)

Discussion Forum

Discuss Star Trek: The Motion Picture on our Movie forum!