Average Rating: 2.6/10
Reviews Counted: 20
Fresh: 0 | Rotten: 20
No consensus yet.
Average Rating: N/A
Critic Reviews: 3
Fresh: 0 | Rotten: 3
liked it
Average Rating: 2.7/5
User Ratings: 17,075
Director Sylvester Stallone proves you really can't go home again in Staying Alive, the absurd sequel to Saturday Night Fever. The story finds Tony Manero (Travolta) six years later working as a waiter in a nightclub while he tries to realize his dreams of dancing on Broadway (what tough street kid from Brooklyn doesn't?) He eventually makes the cut as an extra for "Satan's Alley" (billed as "a musical trip through Hell") and immediately sets his sights on the show's snooty prima-donna star
Jul 15, 1983 Wide
Oct 8, 2002
Paramount Home Video
All Critics (20) | Top Critics (3) | Fresh (1) | Rotten (20) | DVD (9)
The bottom line is that Staying Alive is nowhere as good as its 1977 predecessor, Saturday Night Fever.
A slick, commercial cinematic jukebox, a series of self-contained song-and-dance sequences that could be cut apart and played forever on MTV -- which is probably what will happen.
A sequel with no understanding of what made its predecessor work.
Tracking Travolta's adventures as he gets to perform on Broadway and falls in and out of love, director Stallone is in his mindless mode when it comes to characterization.
It all amounts to an embarrassing show of unrestrained, Hollywood-style egomania.
If not quite one of the worst sequels ever made, it's near the top of the list of all-time most disappointing sequels. Writer-director Stallone stupidly attempts to turn Tony Manero into a dancing Rocky.
All could be forgiven if it weren't for the soulless overall slickness.
Was this sequel really necessary? Nope.
Saturday Night Fever through the eyes of Stallone.
So horrific are the musical sequences in this movie that you'll swear you were having nightmares directed by Satan himself.
1.5
More like staying dead...a monotonous and unnecessary sequel that has all the grace and flow of a greased hog on rollerskates
The words 'directed by Sylvester Stallone' say it all.
I actually liked this sequel. Seems like I?m the only one though! I had no idea Sylvester Stallone directed it though. I suppose it's quite similar to Rocky in many ways!
September 28, 2009Super Reviewer
I usually expect sequels to pale in comparison to the original. I have lowered expectations when watching such movies. For instance, one of my favorite movies of the 80s was Karate Kid. The Karate Kid part II, while not nearly as good, was a worthy sequel. Same thing with Rambo, First Blood Part 1 and II, Godfather
January 4, 2008Super Reviewer
| 35% | The Hangover Part II |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 81% | Kung Fu Panda 2 |
| 44% | Cowboys & Aliens |
| 83% | Rise of the Planet of the Apes |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 88% | Lady and the Tramp |
| 69% | A Very Harold & Kumar Christmas |
| 21% | Fireflies in the Garden |
| 45% | The Rebound |
Journey 2 Not Worth the Trip
What are his 10 best movies ever?
See the all-new action-packed trailer!
Five new Marvelous pictures