97% Ghostbusters Aug 29
28% As Above/So Below Aug 29
33% The November Man Aug 27
98% Starred Up Aug 27
76% The Congress Aug 29

Top Box Office

92% Guardians of the Galaxy $17.2M
20% Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles $16.7M
38% If I Stay $15.7M
21% Let's Be Cops $10.8M
18% When The Game Stands Tall $8.4M
34% The Expendables 3 $6.5M
32% The Giver $6.4M
46% Sin City: A Dame to Kill For $6.3M
65% The Hundred-Foot Journey $5.3M
19% Into The Storm $3.8M

Coming Soon

—— Innocence Sep 05
—— The Longest Week Sep 05
—— The Identical Sep 05
67% The House of Magic Sep 05
74% God Help the Girl Sep 05

New Episodes Tonight

—— Jonah From Tonga: Season 1

Discuss Last Night's Shows

88% The Cosmopolitans: Season One
100% Defiance: Season 2
100% Garfunkel and Oates: Season 1
89% The Honorable Woman: Season 1
56% Married: Season 1
39% Rush: Season 1
82% Satisfaction: Season 1
82% Welcome to Sweden: Season 1
77% You're the Worst: Season 1

Certified Fresh TV

86% The Bridge (FX): Season 2
91% Doctor Who: Season 8
83% Extant: Season 1
89% The Honorable Woman: Season 1
87% The Knick: Season 1
89% Manhattan: Season 1
97% Masters of Sex: Season 2
73% Murder in the First: Season 1
89% Outlander: Season 1
82% Satisfaction: Season 1
87% The Strain: Season 1
82% Welcome to Sweden: Season 1
77% You're the Worst: Season 1

Time Regained Reviews

Page 1 of 3
John B

Super Reviewer

November 23, 2012
I can't fault the acting. These folks were trying..but it was terribly boring.
January 1, 2013
I had to make myself watch this film to gain any insight into Ruiz's cinematic treatment of the perception of time. The portrayal of every temporal concept seemed to be artificial, at least by today's standards. However, given that this film was made in 1997-98 I was disappointed that there wasn't something more subtle than what seems to be the surrealistic cinematic techniques of the 1950's. I suppose Ruiz is to be praised for his attempting to film Marcel Proust's novel but the film did nothing more than whet my interest in exploring the novel itself.
March 6, 2011
This was wonderful--beautiful. It's given me an achey nostalgia for Marcel and his lovely novel. Ok, most of you know I'm nuts anyway. Now you can be sure.
October 29, 2007
[b]Length:[/b] 165 minutes.
In French with English subtitles.
[b]MPAA:[/b] Not Rated.

In [i]Time Regained[/i], writer-director Raoul Ruiz has accomplished the seemingly impossible feat of capturing the feel of Marcel Proust?s prose on film. Ruiz? movie, which stars Catherine Deneuve, John Malkovich, and Emmanuelle Béart, is a visually stunning adaptation of part of Proust?s novel [i]Remembrance of Things Past[/i]. Like the novel, the film is a richly textured, plotless, character-driven rumination on memory, and I expect that most people will find [i]Time Regained[/i] confusing and sometimes boring at first viewing. But I believe those who are willing to study this challenging French-language movie will find it to be a rewarding experience.

[i]Remembrance of Things Past[/i] is the collective title for seven volumes, and the film [i]Time Regained[/i] focuses mainly on the last volume, which in the most popular English translation is titled [i]The Past Recaptured[/i]. However, some parts of the movie are taken from earlier volumes of the novel. Also, in places the film blends the life of Proust, the author, with that of his fictional alter ego Marcel, the novel?s narrator.

The movie opens in 1922 with Proust on his deathbed, still working on his magnum opus. Then as Proust looks at some old photographs, in his mind?s eye he becomes his narrator Marcel (Marcello Mazzarella), a man of bourgeois origins who is fascinated with the social elite of Paris. Marcel?s reveries are shown in a kaleidoscopic sequence of short scenes where most of the film?s major characters, settings, and themes are introduced.

About 14 minutes into the film, Marcel speaks in voiceover the words that begin the seventh volume of Proust?s novel: "All day long in this too countrified house ..." At this point Marcel is the house guest of Gilberte (Béart), his friend since childhood, and her husband Robert de Saint-Loup (Pascal Greggory) at their country estate at Tansonville. Gilberte is melancholy because her husband is unfaithful, and as she and Marcel discuss matters of the heart, Marcel tells her, "Heartbreak can kill, but leaves no trace." Gilberte lends Marcel a copy of the Goncourts? [i]Journal[/i], and as he reads it on the train back to Paris, it reminds him of all the people he has come to know.

During World War I, Marcel attends a soirée given by Madame Verdurin (Marie-France Pisier) where a fashion designer is discussing his concept for a new line of jewelry made from shrapnel. A guest asks the hostess, "Still no sign of Odette?", to which Madame Verdurin indicates that she hopes Odette will come, adding, "She met [i]both[/i] her husbands here." Odette, the former Madame Swann, has now become Madame de Forcheville. As Odette (Deneuve) makes her entrance, Madame Verdurin says to another guest, "She?s aged. Or am I dreaming?" The guest responds, "You?re dreaming. She?s ravishing."

In a subsequent scene, we see Marcel going into an elegant restaurant in Paris with Odette, who is Gilberte?s mother and Marcel?s lifelong friend. However, Odette leaves almost immediately, and Marcel sees her out the door as air raid sirens wail. Marcel then goes back inside and as German bombs are heard exploding in the background, he seeks out his old acquaintance the Baron de Charlus (Malkovich) for a talk. After Marcel leaves, he is unable to get a taxi and wanders into a hotel that turns out to be a male brothel. Hearing strange sounds that might be made by someone in great pain, he investigates and discovers Charlus is making the sounds while handcuffed to a bedpost and being whipped. Also, a Croix de Guerre turns up at the brothel, and we find out it belongs to Saint-Loup, who is now serving in the military.

After World War I is over, the always sickly Marcel returns to Paris from a stay in a sanitarium and encounters Charlus, who has never fully recovered from a major illness and now looks quite old. Marcel thinks back to a time years earlier when, as an adolescent, he had a conversation with Charlus on the beach at Balbec, a Normandy seaside resort. Charlus had given him some sensible advice: "Use your youth to learn two things. First, refrain from displaying emotions that are best left unspoken. Second, don?t rush into answering questions before you?ve understood them."

Later, a long sequence shows Marcel attending a lavish afternoon party given by the Princesse de Guermantes. There he sees Gilberte for the first time in years, although at first he fails to recognize her because she looks so old. From Gilberte, he learns that the current Princesse de Guermantes is none other than the former Madame Verdurin, whose nouveau-riche first husband has died, allowing her to use the money he accumulated to marry into the titled aristocracy. Then, Marcel is told by a dreadful American woman that Odette is now the mistress of the Duc de Guermantes. Throughout the party, Marcel?s mind is filled with memories from the past.

As Proust nears death, his final reveries take him back to a seaside resort in Normandy. He imagines himself as a young boy, playing on the beach near the water?s edge. The final shot of the film is of the ocean waves.

I have deliberately tried to keep my description of [i]Time Regained[/i] as straightforward as possible because the movie seems at first viewing to be so difficult. The primary reason for this is that the film, in imitation of involuntary memory, does not present events in chronological order. For example, a scene from a funeral is shown without the viewer being given any hint as to whose funeral it is, and the deceased appears quite alive in a subsequent scene. A second confusion factor is that writer-director Ruiz occasionally employs magic realism, as in those scenes where two versions of Marcel--Mazzarella playing the mature Marcel and a child actor playing Marcel as a young boy--appear simultaneously. Yet a third reason that the film is hard to follow at first is that there are so many characters that it?s not easy to keep them all straight.

I was captivated by this movie?s visual style, which hypnotically evokes the quality of memory itself. Among the techniques used are strange camera angles, slow motion, dream-like sequences, and separate images that fuse together. But none of this intrudes on the opulent look of the film, with its elaborate sets and sumptuous costumes.

The characters that Proust?s exquisite, seamless prose once summoned forth in my imagination were brought to vibrant life by the superb performances in [i]Time Regained[/i]. John Malkovich has always been one of my favorite actors, and I was particularly impressed with his portrayal of the Baron de Charlus, imbuing the character with just the right amount of silky decadence and an underlying mania that cannot be kept completely under wraps. Malkovich?s Charlus has one of the most subtly hideous laughs I?ve ever heard.

I?ll admit that after my first pass through [i]Time Regained[/i], I felt a bit overwhelmed by its complexity. Still, I knew that I?ve worked my way through other difficult films in the past--Ingmar Bergman?s [i]Persona[/i] is one that comes immediately to mind--that I?ve eventually come to love, and I was hoping that [i]Time Regained[/i] would be another such movie. So it didn?t surprise me all that much that on second viewing, I really started to love Ruiz? film. [i]Time Regained[/i] is definitely not for everyone, but for those willing to invest the necessary time and energy, I give this movie my highest possible recommendation.
September 3, 2006
A film version of Marcel Proust.
Well... the actor performance is definitely good. And sometimes even outstanding. Especially Malkovich.
I did not read the book in full - such literature is not mine and I can't endure Proust philosophy and lack of actions in the plot.
That's why I am absolutely objective about the movie. It is boring for an ordinary spectator. Too boring in fact.
You should be a real fan of Proust to understand the movie and to enjoy the lines, the relations between characters, the constant "jumping" from one memory of Proust to another one.
Those who knows the content of the book may have absolutely different rating - it may be much higher or lower (experts whom I know told me it is more a failure than a triumph!)
Page 1 of 3
Find us on:                     
Help | About | Jobs | Critics Submission | Press | API | Licensing | Mobile