Average Rating: 6/10
Reviews Counted: 22
Fresh: 17 | Rotten: 5
No consensus yet.
Average Rating: N/A
Critic Reviews: 3
Fresh: 2 | Rotten: 1
liked it
Average Rating: 3.4/5
User Ratings: 2,855
First published in 1932, Philip Wylie and Edwin Balmer's speculative novel When Worlds Collide was immediately purchased by Paramount as a possible project for director Cecil B. DeMille. But because none of Paramount's scriptwriters were able to come up with an adequate screen treatment, the property lay on the shelf until 1950, when producer George Pal was casting about for a follow-up to his successful sci-fier Destination Moon. Though the film was top-heavy with special effects, Pal was able
Aug 1, 1951 Wide
Sep 25, 2001
Paramount Pictures
All Critics (22) | Top Critics (3) | Fresh (18) | Rotten (7) | DVD (11)
This probably looks about as stodgy now as it did back then.
Top honors for this inter-planetary fantasy rest with the cameramen and special effects technicians rather than with performances of the non-name cast.
Mr. Pal barely gets us out there, but this time he doesn't bring us back.
Too bad the finale plays like a greeting card you wish someone had just given you the money for instead.
Best appreciated for its apocalyptic special effects.
Cinema's most neurasthenic version of the apocalypse
If the naive dramatic situations and trite idealism can be ignored, the viewer is in for an amazing spectacle of special effects.
Never mind plot logic, don't think too hard about the 'sci' component of the sci-fi, and certainly keep the unsubtle sociology and Pal's typical Bible-based gloss in perspective. When Worlds Collide remains entertaining and satisfying....
Paramount's DVD edition of When Worlds Collide has no special features, but it should please the film's fans all the same.... The Technicolor palette is rich and true.... Even the theatrical trailer looks great.
George Pal's production is better remembered for its apocalyptic special effects than for the perfunctory dialogue, but the gripping story keeps you watching.
It has . . . a trailer.
Totally outdated by now . . .
I know that this movie is not usually regarded as one of the classic or best sci-fi movies of the 50s, even the early 50s, but I think it's highly underrated. Give it a chance and see what you think. The special effects are really very spectacular, especially when you read about how they made the movie. The story
September 5, 2010Super Reviewer
This is not your typical low-budget 50's sci-fi thriller. The effects here, with the possible exception of the final scene, are stunning. This is global Armageddon with style! Nostalgic, but still technologically impressive.
January 20, 2009
Super Reviewer
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 83% | Puss in Boots |
| 94% | Moneyball |
| 59% | Real Steel |
| 84% | Contagion |
| 83% | Puss in Boots |
| 68% | Tower Heist |
| 90% | Martha Marcy May Marlene |
| 33% | London Boulevard |
| 17% | The Son of No One |
Worst Best Picture Nominees
50 best-reviewed Best Picture nominees
Ranking the 75 best animated movies ever!
Download the official PDF!