Tiger Eyes (2013) - Rotten Tomatoes

Tiger Eyes (2013)

TOMATOMETER

AUDIENCE SCORE

Critic Consensus: No consensus yet.

Tiger Eyes Videos

Tiger Eyes Photos

Movie Info

Tiger Eyes marks the first major motion picture adaptation from the work of iconic author Judy Blume, whose books have sold more than 82 million copies in 41 countries. Davey is a 17 year-old girl abruptly relocated by her grieving mother to the strange "atom bomb" town of Los Alamos, New Mexico. With the sudden and violent death of her father, the displaced Davey no longer knows who to be or how to fit in. Everything that once mattered suddenly seems insignificant. But when she meets Wolf, a mysterious young Native-American, while exploring the surrounding canyons, she feels he is able to see past her pain and into her true self. The connection they make brings Davey back from the edge and sets her on a journey from heartbreak and confusion to life and love after tragedy.

Watch it now

Cast

Russell Means
as Willie Means
Show More Cast

News & Interviews for Tiger Eyes

Critic Reviews for Tiger Eyes

All Critics (29) | Top Critics (14)

It's a pleasant-enough movie, but offers little that the book doesn't give its readers; far too quickly, it fades away.

October 24, 2013
Seattle Times
Top Critic

Remarkably, the story, adapted by Blume with her son, director Lawrence Blume, seems as fresh, painful and poignant as when she wrote it.

Full Review… | June 7, 2013
Dallas Morning News
Top Critic

There are no surprises among the characters - depressed mom (Amy Jo Johnson), controlling aunt (Cynthia Stevenson), new boyfriend (Tatanka Means) - but the cast is strong enough to build on familiar elements.

Full Review… | June 7, 2013
New York Daily News
Top Critic

Time has robbed Blume's subjects of shock value, but her perceptiveness hasn't dimmed. The movie's sincerity carries it along, and makes this story endearing despite its filmmaking clichés.

Full Review… | June 7, 2013
New York Post
Top Critic

This attenuated coming-of-age tale oozes heart and perhaps too much respect for its source material.

June 7, 2013
New York Times
Top Critic

A gentle, honest and shrewdly realized film ... It's worth seeking out.

Full Review… | June 6, 2013
Chicago Tribune
Top Critic

Audience Reviews for Tiger Eyes

½

One of the few Judy Blume books I didn't read growing up. I found an ex rental for $4, so it was a nostalgic purchase. Actually it wasn't thrilling. I think I understand how I missed it. Though the movie looks nice and the cast are good, I wasn't all that disappointed when the disc froze halfway through and couldn't be played any further. Maybe it didn't translate well from the novel or maybe i am just too old now...

Nicki Marie
Nicki Marie

Super Reviewer

½

A realistic and emotional coming of age story about love and loss and family.

Dannielle Albert
Dannielle Albert

Super Reviewer

½

"It's the eye of the tiger, it's the thrill of the fight, rising up to the challenge of our rival, and the last known survivor stalks his prey in the night, and he's watching us all with the eye... of the tiger!" ...Alright, there you go, I did it, and it could have been worse somehow, like, say, a spin on the lyrics to "Hungry Eyes" or something. There were enough complaints regarding "dirty dancing" surrounding this material when this film's source young adult novel was first released back in the 1981, if you know what I mean (Wink-wink-nudge-nudge). You probably don't know what I mean, because by now, I can't think of too many people who are still interested in Judy Blume's "Tiger Eyes", let alone controversies surrounding sexual material in the novel which is basically for kids... who are old enough to most likely be doing the same thing (Stupid marketers disregard the depravity of teenagers), so much so that Blume had to get her son to direct this adaptation over 30 years after the book's release (The book actually is older than the song "The Eye of the Tiger"). Even I, for one, am mostly here because Willa Holland looks awful pretty in the poster, and plus, I'm interested to see what she'll do without the CW, even if this film is as well-funded and, well, watched as "The Arrow". Eh, she's still too deep in her niche, and I knew it was coming when she got so far into the "Teen Media Zone" that she voiced a character in, not one, but two "Kingdom Hearts" game (It was the same character, but I get more depressed for Haley Joel Osment's career with every new release of a "Kingdom Hearts" game featuring him in the voice cast), and sure enough, she's somehow worked her way into an "independent" young adult drama. Young "adults" aren't going to see this, or even hear about it, and that's a shame, because this film is pretty decent, even though it's not without a deal of issues, much like teenagers who aren't decent (Seriously, marketers, there is no innocence in childhood when the teen years arrive). While this film is kind of like your more run-of-the-mill commercial teen drama in plenty of areas, in just as many areas, it's a less heavily produced and more thoughtful independent piece, and if you think that means that this film gets dull, then, well, yup, you're pretty much right, because when thoughtful storytelling gets carried away, atmosphere really dries up and pacing takes serious damage that it cannot afford to have if it hopes to keep you from noticing just how dragged out plotting is with repetitious excess material that gets to be so abundant that it ends up driving much of the film. Still, as bloated as the film is in some areas, it takes only so much time to flesh out what intrigue there is to this film's characters through extensive development, possibly because screenwriters Judy and Lawrence Blume know that you know these characters and situations, and not just because the book upon which this film is based was so popular for a while. Seeing as how Judy Blume is credited as an innovator in young adult novel writing, perhaps this film's subject matter was refreshing at the time of its source material's release, but at this point, we've seen what this film has to offer so much that this interpretation of an ostensibly once-unique story comes off as kind of embarrassingly generic, with highly distinct character types and familiar plot points that inspire predictability. In this day and age, this film offers you very little that you haven't already seen time and again, yet when I say that plotting is predictable, I kind of mean that loosely, seeing as how this film gets to be a bit aimless when all of the aforementioned dragging further thins out the focus of this film's paper-thin story. Okay, perhaps "paper-thin" is a relatively harsh adjective to describe this subject matter, as it has some weighty thematic depth, as well as a few worthy dramatic areas, but on the whole, there's something inconsequential about this aimless story about simply finding resolution through no real external conflict. There's not a whole lot to the story, and what limited bit there is may very well end up being anything from borderline trite to overblown, if not undercooked, and such a formula has meant disaster for other films of this distinct type, and certainly leaves this particular effort to run the risk of collapsing into mediocrity. Well, mediocrity doesn't quite claim this film, which is seriously flawed, but decent, and even inspired in certain areas, including the musical ones, at least up to an extent. Independent young adult fare or not, this film is still very much directed at youngsters, and let me tell you, we're not talking about the youngsters of the early '80s who were targeted by this film's source material, so when the song soundtrack kicked in with all of its poppish ditties for all of the 15-to-20-year-old to enjoy for some inexplicable reason, I found my patience challenged to no end, which, of course, helped me in appreciating Nathan Larson's original score, which is underused throughout this relatively quiet drama, and doesn't have all that much to it in the first place, but has a certain endearing tastefulness to it that is pretty pretty, though perhaps not as pretty as the film's visual style. A low-profile project with the tightest of budgets, this film certainly can't afford Seamus McGarvey as its cinematographer, so it has to settle with Seamus Tierney, who in turn has to settle with relatively cheap filming material that has only so much definition to it, yet where Tierney could have struggled to obscure the shortcomings in photography, he celebrates them near-ingeniously, combining in hauntingly inspired tastes in lighting with somewhat watered-down definition in order to give the film a very uniquely rugged visual style that is consistently attractive, and sometimes surprisingly gorgeous. If nothing else is unique about this film, it's its visual style, which isn't too outstanding, but inspired enough for you to see gorgeousness through its shortcomings, yet the inspiration hardly ends with style, because without inspired storytelling, this drama could very well fall flat under the weight of its natural shortcomings. Judy Blume's classic story is thin in conflict, and this contemporary interpretation of it feels too celebratory of the tropes that its source material ironically helped in establishing just about thirty-two years ago, but really, it's still worthy in plenty of places, having a realist thematic and dramatic depth that has stood the test of time, and is brought to life in certain areas by the inspired direction by Blume's son Lawrence, whose efforts aren't too strong, but thoughtfully soak up a fair deal of the depth from his mother's very humanly tender story. Sure, the thoughtfulness in Blume's storytelling sometimes gets carried away in steadying pacing, while ambition stresses the film's other shortcomings, yet the heart that Blume puts into this drama carries certain effective moments quite a ways, while keeping the final product consistently endearing, much like the heart found within the inspired onscreen performances. Former Power Ranger Amy Jo Johnson is way too underused in the film to stand out all that much on a general standard, but when he has a moment to shine, she really steals the show with a powerful portrayal of a grieving widow, and when it comes to the other unknown, or at least forgotten talents within this cast, most everyone delivers as well as he or she can with such limited and familiar material, with our pretty leading lady Willa Holland carrying the film with a tender charisma and moments of subtle emotional strength which capture the quiet angst and subtle layers of a coming-of-age youth dealing with the loss of a parent and the process of embracing a new home which reveals new, life-altering peers and opportunities. Holland isn't outstanding, but she and her peers back their performances with an inspiration that is all too rarely seen in films of this nature, and joins just as inspired storytelling in doing a lot to carry the final product as decent, even if it can't carry things too terribly far. When it's all said and done, atmospheric dry spells reflect a repetitious, maybe even aimless dragging in plotting, while underdevelopment leaves you to meditate upon the genericism within the characters and story, and natural shortcomings within the thin story leave the final product to run the risk of collapsing into mediocrity, which is ultimately kept at bay by the lovely original score work, handsomely unique cinematography, heartfelt storytelling and inspired acting that make "Tiger Eyes" an often compelling and consistently endearing young adult drama, in spite of its flaws. 2.5/5 - Fair

Cameron Johnson
Cameron Johnson

Super Reviewer

Tiger Eyes Quotes

Discussion Forum

Discuss Tiger Eyes on our Movie forum!

News & Features