Love's Labour's Lost (2000) - Rotten Tomatoes

Love's Labour's Lost (2000)

Love's Labour's Lost (2000)

TOMATOMETER

AUDIENCE SCORE

Critic Consensus: Interesting idea, poor execution.

Love's Labour's Lost Photos

Movie Info

In 1939, the King of Navarre and his three best friends swear an oath to give up women for three years whilst devoting themselves to the study of philosophy. One of the terms of their pledge specifically prohibits women from their presence, but the arrival of the Princess of France and her three beautiful attendants on a diplomatic visit throws the plan into disarray. Is this a feasible feat for a man of the court? And what of the King? The men begin to pursue their desires unbeknownst to each other, acting in secret and concealing their passions. The mood is broken by the news of the death of the Princess's father and the girls return to France. In the meantime, France has fallen to the Nazis and the men must leave to fight for their countries. Before they leave, the heartbroken men dedicate their love and promise to remain faithful. The war will test the couples' devotion and therefore decide the fate of their futures together.
Rating:
PG (for sensuality and a brief drug reference)
Genre:
Comedy , Drama , Musical & Performing Arts , Romance
Directed By:
Written By:
In Theaters:
 wide
On DVD:
Runtime:
Studio:

Watch it now

Cast

Alicia Silverstone
as The Princess
Adrian Lester
as Dumaine
Timothy Spall
as Don Armado
Nathan Lane
as Costard
Matthew Lillard
as Longaville
Stefania Rocca
as Jacquanetta
Geraldine McEwan
as Holofernia
Richard Briers
as Nathaniel
Emily Mortimer
as Katherine
Daniel Hill
as Mercade
Alfred Bell
as Gaston
Daisy Gough
as Isabelle
Paul Moody
as Jaques
Yvonne Reilly
as Beatrice
Emma Scott
as Celimene
Amy Tez
as Sophie
Show More Cast

Critic Reviews for Love's Labour's Lost

All Critics (64) | Top Critics (19)

A luscious labor of love.

Full Review… | July 6, 2008
Variety
Top Critic

An act of double homage to antique artifice.

Full Review… | February 9, 2006
Time Out
Top Critic

Maybe Kenneth Branagh should have left the Hollywood musical where he found it, back in the 1930s.

February 21, 2004
Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Top Critic

Even though Love's Labour's Lost is, in showbiz terms, a turkey stuffed with chestnuts, you wouldn't trade it for a pot of gold.

Full Review… | January 1, 2000
New York Times
Top Critic

Love's Labour's Lost hops, bumps and skids along the ground like the flightless creature that it is.

January 1, 2000
Toronto Star
Top Critic

With all the cutesy-pie self-consciousness on display, the fizz goes off the pink champagne awfully quickly.

Full Review… | January 1, 2000
Seattle Times
Top Critic

Audience Reviews for Love's Labour's Lost

Branagh's idea is to conjoin Shakespearean comedy with 1930's era Hollywood musicals ... what could go wrong? At first I felt as if I were having a tooth pulled, without novacaine. The performances? I remembered the Freudian nightmare of appearing in public naked and finally concluded the cast was far, far braver than I. By the finale it didn't hurt as bad ... but no one will be pleased with this. Only Nathan Lane manages to escape completely unscathed.

Kevin M. Williams
Kevin M. Williams

Super Reviewer

One of the kind of films that you wished you could love more than you actually do. Because they don't really do anything wrong. They take Shakespeare's play and put it into the 1930s musical era, with all the singing, dancing and water ballet that comes with it. The songs are more or less familiar, some performances really fun and good, others somewhat boring. The cast is great, only Matthew Lillard feels like the odd man out, the set pieces and design rather lovely. It's hard to say why the film didn't work for me anyway. Sometimes it was hard to keep track why things were happening the way they turned out, and I usually didn't have a problem with Shakespeare's language. I felt a bit let down after all, only the ending was rather sweet. I suppose it's one for Musical or Shakespeare fanatics, everyone else feel free to skip. Sadly.

Jens S.
Jens S.

Super Reviewer

Okay, so this Branagh go at Shakespeare may leave out a lot of the Bard's words, but the spirit is definitely there. Strictly speaking, in the classic sense, comedy does not necessarily equal ha-ha funny. To put it in truly simplistic terms, comedy has only to follow a certain path. With tragedy in the classic sense, there is the trajectory of rise and fall, whereas with comedy, there is fall and rise -- with or without yucks.

One need only compare Branagh's attempt with that of the BBC's complete dramatic works of Shakespeare attempt, to see that Branagh has infused the play with the proper spirit, the lively humor it should have. The BBC attempt is so droningly unpleasant -- although much truer to the text -- that it feels in the aftermath like a disheartening tragedy.

As I've said before, I hope Branagh does all of Shakespeare's plays before he blows out the candle. Every one of his productions breathes vibrant bright life into the plays, closer to the text or not. I think if Shakespeare saw this adaptation, he'd love it.

Lanning : )
Lanning : )

Super Reviewer

Love's Labour's Lost Quotes

There are no approved quotes yet for this movie.

Discussion Forum

Discuss Love's Labour's Lost on our Movie forum!

News & Features