Do I Sound Gay? Reviews

  • Oct 29, 2017

    Disappointing documentary because it doesn't really ask the right secondary questions and search for more scientific rationale for the title question.

    Disappointing documentary because it doesn't really ask the right secondary questions and search for more scientific rationale for the title question.

  • Aug 09, 2016

    Fun and light but with just enough weight to keep you interested. And it has Dan Savage in it.

    Fun and light but with just enough weight to keep you interested. And it has Dan Savage in it.

  • Jul 04, 2016

    Let's just cut to the chase; The answer is yes.

    Let's just cut to the chase; The answer is yes.

  • Jun 22, 2016

    Of interest to anyone who has ever felt disconnected with any of the various elements that make up who we are.

    Of interest to anyone who has ever felt disconnected with any of the various elements that make up who we are.

  • Jun 12, 2016

    So honest and vulnerable. A must-watch!

    So honest and vulnerable. A must-watch!

  • Apr 26, 2016

    This lighthearted film film explores an issue that not many people talk about.

    This lighthearted film film explores an issue that not many people talk about.

  • Apr 22, 2016

    A very interesting documentary that explores the gay identity. The ending is somewhat predictable, that said, it doesn't make the film any less entertaining. Jack.

    A very interesting documentary that explores the gay identity. The ending is somewhat predictable, that said, it doesn't make the film any less entertaining. Jack.

  • Apr 07, 2016

    Very self loathing. Suck it up and accept who you are.

    Very self loathing. Suck it up and accept who you are.

  • Mar 23, 2016

    I thought it was a very interesting perspective on the voice of gay men.

    I thought it was a very interesting perspective on the voice of gay men.

  • Mar 20, 2016

    His personal story is not interesting at all, taking time from the bigger issue to be discussed. The audiovisual lenguage is very poor and the topic and cientific approach is very superficial in the way they handle different definitions of gender/discrimination/sexual differences. With more investigation it would have been more constructive to the audience.

    His personal story is not interesting at all, taking time from the bigger issue to be discussed. The audiovisual lenguage is very poor and the topic and cientific approach is very superficial in the way they handle different definitions of gender/discrimination/sexual differences. With more investigation it would have been more constructive to the audience.