Alexander Reviews

  • Oct 11, 2020

    [Director's Cut] Don't bother watching any other version of Oliver Stone's sword-and-sandal project because his personal cut is far and away the only focused and coherent interpretation/assembly of all the scenes that were shot.

    [Director's Cut] Don't bother watching any other version of Oliver Stone's sword-and-sandal project because his personal cut is far and away the only focused and coherent interpretation/assembly of all the scenes that were shot.

  • Sep 16, 2020

    I don't understand why so many people don't like this movie, I saw the extended version and loved the movie, it's a masterpiece !!!

    I don't understand why so many people don't like this movie, I saw the extended version and loved the movie, it's a masterpiece !!!

  • Jun 27, 2020

    One of the worst, thinnest scripted biopics I have ever seen. Absolutely no insight to be found.

    One of the worst, thinnest scripted biopics I have ever seen. Absolutely no insight to be found.

  • Jun 02, 2020

    I saw "Alexander Revisited: The final cut" and I liked it, this film, in my opinion, is a masterpiece of modern cinema because it has the best battle scenes ever made, it has beautiful cinematography, a spectacular soundtrack by Vangelis. But it is a film that I recommend watching.

    I saw "Alexander Revisited: The final cut" and I liked it, this film, in my opinion, is a masterpiece of modern cinema because it has the best battle scenes ever made, it has beautiful cinematography, a spectacular soundtrack by Vangelis. But it is a film that I recommend watching.

  • May 09, 2020

    Awful. Why do they all speak with an Irish accent? How could a movie get so bad?

    Awful. Why do they all speak with an Irish accent? How could a movie get so bad?

  • May 08, 2020

    Mess. Dialogue in this film is just.. Kids wrote it.

    Mess. Dialogue in this film is just.. Kids wrote it.

  • May 03, 2020

    Viewed in an academic and historical context within the pantheon of the Classics, I would say it is a glorious accomplishment. This is because it provides such a rich and elegant, colorful visual reference to our shared ancient history. How exotic was it with the tribal dance segments, or the Babylolonian Hanging Gardens (one of the ancient wonders of the world. Find me an "illustration" of the Gardens because that's all we got), or how about the snake courting Vedic Hindus in the elephant stormed jungles of India. How intriguing, the mythic wonders of the WORLD now given color, dancing, fire, battle and pure effulgence. This is a movie which provides a visual reference for what the dissemination of Western civilization would have looked like. It shows Greece (Macedon was decidedly considered Greek in the early 5th century invention of the Olympics. the Greek city states only allowed true Greeks to participate in the Olympics and it was decided collectively that the Macedonian were granted were subsequently considered Greek because they were granted permission to play. This film shows how one small city state, the host of Plato and Alexander's teacher Aristotle show the forging and destiny of our modern Western world. Again, I stress it is a top success in that it provides a beautiful visual reference that can allow us to see the past. I have been robbed of this by just reading textbooks and watching directors make fantasy epics when the history itself is more interesting. How many low budget Roman shows have we been given that fail to achieve a realistic depiction of what the past looked like. This film is narrated in epic verse, it is intentionally replicating the tone and style of what we see as baroque and Homeric in its Sophoclean gusto. But sorry to say just like Shakespeare and just like the Bible we will always associate a different tone to past epics that were written in a different vernacular. This is also a great throwback to classic cinema epics. Like Cleopatra, Lawrence of Arabia, Dr. Zhivago, Ghandi. The film is in all respects an Epic like Ben Hur or Giant. Be warned there are some problems with this film, some major casting issues, certain over the top aspects people today do not relish. Most of all does it have historical inaccuracies (gaugamela was not the battle where Alexander charged Darius, or when Clietus saves his life. That was the battle of Issus and Granicus, essentially Oliver Stone just smudges them all together) but that's fine these things are tough to always get right. Over all I feel so much better with this depiction of the ancient world because now it has filled in the gaps where no other director will ever go. - This was written by Gabriel Verveniotis who is the author of The Sanguinaires Or What I Hate Most about Everything, available in stores and online.

    Viewed in an academic and historical context within the pantheon of the Classics, I would say it is a glorious accomplishment. This is because it provides such a rich and elegant, colorful visual reference to our shared ancient history. How exotic was it with the tribal dance segments, or the Babylolonian Hanging Gardens (one of the ancient wonders of the world. Find me an "illustration" of the Gardens because that's all we got), or how about the snake courting Vedic Hindus in the elephant stormed jungles of India. How intriguing, the mythic wonders of the WORLD now given color, dancing, fire, battle and pure effulgence. This is a movie which provides a visual reference for what the dissemination of Western civilization would have looked like. It shows Greece (Macedon was decidedly considered Greek in the early 5th century invention of the Olympics. the Greek city states only allowed true Greeks to participate in the Olympics and it was decided collectively that the Macedonian were granted were subsequently considered Greek because they were granted permission to play. This film shows how one small city state, the host of Plato and Alexander's teacher Aristotle show the forging and destiny of our modern Western world. Again, I stress it is a top success in that it provides a beautiful visual reference that can allow us to see the past. I have been robbed of this by just reading textbooks and watching directors make fantasy epics when the history itself is more interesting. How many low budget Roman shows have we been given that fail to achieve a realistic depiction of what the past looked like. This film is narrated in epic verse, it is intentionally replicating the tone and style of what we see as baroque and Homeric in its Sophoclean gusto. But sorry to say just like Shakespeare and just like the Bible we will always associate a different tone to past epics that were written in a different vernacular. This is also a great throwback to classic cinema epics. Like Cleopatra, Lawrence of Arabia, Dr. Zhivago, Ghandi. The film is in all respects an Epic like Ben Hur or Giant. Be warned there are some problems with this film, some major casting issues, certain over the top aspects people today do not relish. Most of all does it have historical inaccuracies (gaugamela was not the battle where Alexander charged Darius, or when Clietus saves his life. That was the battle of Issus and Granicus, essentially Oliver Stone just smudges them all together) but that's fine these things are tough to always get right. Over all I feel so much better with this depiction of the ancient world because now it has filled in the gaps where no other director will ever go. - This was written by Gabriel Verveniotis who is the author of The Sanguinaires Or What I Hate Most about Everything, available in stores and online.

  • Apr 06, 2020

    A long movie that is a summation of Alexander's campaign across Asia. Surprisingly they skip over Egypt entirely. The battles are hit and miss. I don't know how 'accurate' this movie is but Stone really focuses on the gay stuff. Not exactly engaging but it was enjoyable to look at. Great set design work.

    A long movie that is a summation of Alexander's campaign across Asia. Surprisingly they skip over Egypt entirely. The battles are hit and miss. I don't know how 'accurate' this movie is but Stone really focuses on the gay stuff. Not exactly engaging but it was enjoyable to look at. Great set design work.

  • Mar 15, 2020

    I really hoped that the 'Final' version would be drastically better. It is better, but ultimately the whole realization of Alexander as the project is badly done by Oliver Stone.

    I really hoped that the 'Final' version would be drastically better. It is better, but ultimately the whole realization of Alexander as the project is badly done by Oliver Stone.

  • Feb 24, 2020

    Alexander is an antagonizing and repetitive film that just happens to have impressive visuals and a superb all star cast.

    Alexander is an antagonizing and repetitive film that just happens to have impressive visuals and a superb all star cast.