Andy Warhol's Frankenstein

Audience Reviews

View More

Paul O @pjkeys Nov 6, 2026 Hilarity ensues when internal organs and blood spatter the silver screen, along with the occasional body part. The self parodying duo from 'Blood for Dracula' are at it again, this time as the good doctor and his assistant, along with the beefcake who provides carnal relief. The acting is over the top and the dialogue absurdly amusing, which makes this movie a comedy worth watching. See more

Teddy B @RT90521672 Oct 31, 2026 If Warhol actually made this film, I'd imagine it would be twelve hours of a man watching 'Frankenstein' re-runs in black-and-white, Cinemascope, with split-screen. As it is, 'Flesh for Frankenstein' is an unremarkable, if fairly competent, film, and a fine subversion on the classic story. See more

Tim M @tgmacman Mar 25, 2026 Certainly ostentatious - and almost overly so - Flesh for Frankenstein nevertheless pairs exploitation with its classic material well. See more

Danny D @RT40060325 Sep 27, 2025 Tries desperately to shock sensibilities (of people that have sense?), it only succeeds in creating a hateful little scuzz-pile of a movie that is depressing due to the time you take watching it, and you could have done something nice with that time (i.e. watch grass grow). It should not have been made, shouldn't have been released, should never be watched, and shouldn't be mentioned. Examples: Baron (Udo Kier) marries his sister (Monique van Vooren, with a face that looks like what an upset stomach feels like) and has incestuous children with her, but cheats on her by fornicating with a female corpse (apparently penetrating the corpses' gall bladder, then shouting about how great it is). If this is your idea of fun, you've found your movie; I will once again not be sending you a Christmas card this year. See more

g j @g.username Jul 25, 2024 A riotous ham-fest of boobs, splattering viscera and hokey German accents, in the tradition of the Brain that Wouldn't Die. See more

dave s @RT68722908 Oct 3, 2021 Flesh for Frankenstein is as campy as a film can be. That doesn't make it a good film, because it's not. Baron Frankenstein (Udo Kier), in an effort to create a new race of perfect humans, creates a pair of zombies (in what he refers to as the "Serbian ideal") with the intent of having them mate. Much to his chagrin, the male creation turns out the be asexual, triggering an unimaginable climax. The movie was at least fun to watch in theaters as a result of the 3-D effects, but seen on television it just comes across as…well…two-dimensional. The acting is brutal, much of the dialogue is unintentionally funny, and the grisly effects lose much of their impact on the small screen. To its benefit, it's sporadically entertaining in a ‘I can't believe I'm watching this' sort of way, but beyond that there is not much to recommend about it. See more

Read all reviews

Andy Warhol's Frankenstein

My Rating

Read More Read Less WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW POST RATING