Brotherhood of the Wolf 2001

Brotherhood of the Wolf

Critics Consensus

Brotherhood of the Wolf mixes its genres with little logic, but the end result is wildly entertaining.

73%

TOMATOMETER

Total Count: 121

78%

Audience Score

User Ratings: 49,072
User image

Verified

  • User image

    Super Reviewer

    Rate this movie

    Oof, that was Rotten.

    Meh, it passed the time.

    It’s good – I’d recommend it.

    Awesome!

    So Fresh: Absolute Must See!

    What did you think of the movie? (optional)



  • You're almost there! Just confirm how you got your ticket.

  • User image

    Super Reviewer

    Step 2 of 2

    How did you buy your ticket?

    Let's get your review verified.

    • Fandango

    • AMCTheatres.com or AMC AppNew

    • Cinemark Coming Soon

      We won’t be able to verify your ticket today, but it’s great to know for the future.

    • Regal Coming Soon

      We won’t be able to verify your ticket today, but it’s great to know for the future.

    • Theater box office or somewhere else

    You're almost there! Just confirm how you got your ticket.

  • User image

    Super Reviewer

    Rate this movie

    Oof, that was Rotten.

    Meh, it passed the time.

    It’s good – I’d recommend it.

    Awesome!

    So Fresh: Absolute Must See!

    What did you think of the movie? (optional)

  • How did you buy your ticket?

    • Fandango

    • AMCTheatres.com or AMC AppNew

    • Cinemark Coming Soon

      We won’t be able to verify your ticket today, but it’s great to know for the future.

    • Regal Coming Soon

      We won’t be able to verify your ticket today, but it’s great to know for the future.

    • Theater box office or somewhere else

Brotherhood of the Wolf Photos

Movie Info

In a rural province of France, a mysterious creature is laying waste to the countryside, savagely killing scores of women and children. Unseen, possessed of enormous strength and a human intelligence, the beast has eluded capture for years. King Louis sends in a renowned scientist and his Iroquois blood brother, an unconventional team whose combined methods and capabilities may bring the beast down. But the true nature of the beast is not what anyone could have anticipated.

Cast & Crew

Samuel Le Bihan
Grégoire de Fronsac
Émilie Dequenne
Marianne
Vincent Cassel
Jean-Francois
Jérémie Renier
Thomas d'Apcher
Jean Yanne
Le Comte de Morangias
Jean-François Stévenin
Henri Sardis
Hans Meyer
Marquis d'Apcher
Édith Scob
Geneviève de Morangias
Stephane Cabel
Writer (Original Screenplay)
Stephane Cabel
Writer (Dialogue)
Dan Laustsen
Director of Photography
Guy-Claude Francois
Set Designer
Dominique Borg
Costume Designer
Show all Cast & Crew

News & Interviews for Brotherhood of the Wolf

Critic Reviews for Brotherhood of the Wolf

All Critics (121) | Top Critics (32) | Fresh (88) | Rotten (33)

Audience Reviews for Brotherhood of the Wolf

  • Apr 13, 2013
    [img]http://images.rottentomatoes.com/images/user/icons/icon14.gif[/img]
    Directors C Super Reviewer
  • Feb 01, 2013
    Bizarre Asian style action in the middle of Louis XV's France, the Brotherhood of the Wold tries to be memorable but ultimately comes up short. It's one of those movies where you watch it, scratch your head and move on.
    John B Super Reviewer
  • Dec 02, 2012
    Brotherhood of the Wolf is an entertaining genre extravaganza that is 1 hour too long. Christophe Gans spent too much time on developing the characters and swashbuckling scenes. The real essence of the story was overlooked. But ti did achieve the goal of being violent, stylish and atmospheric. With little polish, Brotherhood of the wolves could have been much better.
    Sylvester K Super Reviewer
  • Sep 15, 2012
    So, are they taking on the original Doom Control or the Teen Titans in this film? Oh wait, I'm sorry, that's Brotherhood of Evil, though you can probably understand why I got mixed up, because with this film's English title and poster, - which features Samuel Le Bihan and Vincent Cassel in a dark and isolated setting while they wear costumes that scream either, "Cool period piece" or, "Meanwhile, at the Legion of Doom!" - I couldn't tell whether this was a, well, as I said, cool period piece or something that Alan Moore would come up with. Of course, now that I've actually seen the film, I can honestly say that I might very well be even more lost on what it is exactly, et je ne suis pas simplement de dire que parce que mon français est un peu rouillé. Wikipedia's list of this film's story aspects include mystery, romance, erotica, politics, horror, adventure, martial arts, monster, thriller and fantasy, so, basically, it's a French wuxia film, only it's not quite that over-the-top. Still, nevertheless, this film mixes genres so much, for all I know, it actually did turn into a superhero film at some point, it's just that I can't quite remember, because so much stuff happens in this film, and in a different language no less, that I had to have gone through a bit of sensory overload at some point. Eh, whatever, this is still a pretty cool movie. Still, as good as this film is, it's not without its faults, even when it comes to the genre mixing. I joke about how this film is pretty much French wuxia, what with all of its going a bit over-the-top in its genre mixing, but really, this film rarely gets to be all that extreme with the mixing and playing up of its genres, keeping things relatively organic with each other and this film's world, yet the film does admittedly have those occasions in which it does slip up a bit with its genre manipulation, to where the genre mixtures feel off-putting and certain genre aspects - from the fantasy or mystery aspects to the over-the-top action aspects - feel a bit too farfetched, thus leaving you to momentarily fall out of the film, as it gets to be a bit too silly for its own good. As I said, the moments in which this film slips up with its genre control are thankfully not especially common, though they do occur and they do throw you off a bit when it comes to the story, and it doesn't help that this film isn't quite the most refreshing addition in whichever genre it falls under. There's only so much material left in this film's primary genres that hasn't been explored time and again, thus this film can either go the route of forging something original from its elaborate mixture of not so original stories into a single refreshing tale, or simply falling into the conventions of its genres, and while this film does have plenty of unique spots, it all too often succumbs to the tropes established by periods dramas, mystery thrillers and so on and so forth, which leaves the story's momentum to slow down a smidge, while what slows down the story's momentum even further is quite literally slowness. The Rotten Tomatoes consensus deems this film "wildly entertaining", though you have to remember that we're talking about film critics talking about a French period piece here, and that in those situations, the critics' words really do mean little, so sure enough, the film hits its dry spells and slows down, limping along rather disengagingly, if not rather dully, or even a touch boringly at times, and while those times in question are rare, with slowness in general being quite a bit less consistent than I expected, the film hits its particularly slow spots to make worse the blandness in the overall steady spots, of which, there are perhaps too many. Still, when you get down to it, one of, if not the biggest problem with this film is the simple fact that it is just too blasted long, clocking in at two-and-a-half hours, and making sure that you don't forget that by laying down exhaustingly excessive material, as well as quite a bit of repetition, which further slows down the momentum of the film and gives you time to see the film's fair deal of other faults. Sure, a film can't really be all that bad off if the worst thing you can say about it is that it's too long, so of course this film's flaws don't destroy it, yet the fact of the matter is that it does have flaws, and quite a few, for although many of the film's faults are in limited supply, they remain present and detrimental to the steam of the film. Still, when it's said... in French and done, the final product is still left kicking, hitting more often than not and ultimately leaving you to walk away satisfied by the film, as well as the final product's style. Sure, the film probably - nay - quite decidedly gets to be overstylized in its playing up a few gimmicky stylistic choices, to an off-putting point, - whether it be something as simple as gratuitous cross fades into another camera angle during a dialogue sequence, or the film's using slow-motion so blasted much that Zack Snyder would say, "Jeez man, speed it up a bit" - yet generally knows how to put its unique stylistic concepts to good use, manipulating nifty novelties - from the aforementioned yet exceptionally smooth slow-motion - especially for 2001, or rather, pre-Zack Snyder - to Dan Laustsen's (Dan the Dane; the French and Danish have to stick together) beautifully detailed and slick photography - with clever slickness that sparks some livliness in this film, and certainly the action sequences. Some action sequences bond style with substance and do a decent job of supplementing consequence in the story, and some action sequences are just here for fun, - as made obvious by the film's sometimes going a bit too over-the-top with its action - yet either way, when action comes into play, it's well worth the wait, as many are elaborately well-concieved, and all are remarkably well-staged and choreographed, as well as complimented by sharp technical value, or at least what once way sharp technical value. In 2001, we had "The Sorcerer's Stone", (or "The Philosopher's Stone", or whatever the Brits call it), "A.I. Artificial Intelligence", "Pearl Harbor" and, of course, "The Fellowship of the Ring", though it would appear as though no one told this film's technical technical team, as this film is still resorting to visual effects that have dated quite a bit by now, yet not so much that you can't recognize their general impressiveness for the time, for although certain effects fault in a fashion that I think even the people of the time would be thrown off by, most effects bond with this world adequately enough to cell their presence in it, particularly during the action. Still, there's not much quite like good old fashion traditional production designs, and sure enough, where the fair-for-their-time visual effects do a passable job of selling certain occasions, - say, of an action nature - the consistently sharp set and costume designs and art direction never cease to sell this era and world dashingly and with verisimilar intracacy (Oh, that back-to-back big-word move even made me dizzy). Technically and aesthetically striking, the film succeeds as spectacle, and as far as substance is concerned, screenwriters Christophe Gans and Stéphane Cabel craft a story that may be rather conventional, as well as a touch thematically uneven and occasionally over-the-top, yet remains generally sharp, being reasonably hefty in scope, with intriguing mystery and drama that engages, while going complimented by neat set pieces, reasonably colorful characterization and even some good dialogue (If the subtitles are reasonably accurate, of course; don't come crying to me if this is actually some Lifetime stuff, Frenchies). Gans and Cabel work past their writing faults to craft a generally engaging story and script, while Gans, as director, works past his storytelling and pacing faults to craft a generally compelling directorial performance, which not only delivers on sharp style, but also on a mostly effective atmosphere that graces thrills with tension, exposition with intrigue and the overall final product with enough compellingness to keep you going. If nothing else, Gans delivers on entertainment value, or at least for the most part, as this film's bite finds itself sometimes restrained by missteps in substance, while the overall final product hit its share of slow spots, - a few of which descend as low as dull - yet goes livened up enough by Gans' inspired direction to hit more than miss when it comes to entertainment, and with the strong story and style backing things up further, the film ultimately emerges through all of its faults as genuinely and consistently enjoyable, and ultimately well worth the time it still perhaps takes too much of. Overall, the story gets to be a bit inorganic in its genre mixing, - partially because a couple of genre aspects go overemphasized to a cheesily gimmicky point - while at least keeping consistent in its succumbing to some conventions, as well as quite a few slow spots, which particularly remind you of just how overlong this sometimes repetitious and often a bit excessive film is, thus leaving the final product's bite restrained, but not to where it doesn't ultimately back up its bark (Bite and bark; get it? Wolf?) through the sometimes too gratuitous yet primarily unique and dazzling style, - complemented by Dan Laustsen's lovely cinematography - excellent production designs and remarkable action sequences that liven up a structurally flawed yet mostly strong story, which goes complimented by Christophe Gans' and Stéphane Cabel's clever set piece, colorful characterization and sometimes sharp dialogue, as well as brought to life by Gans' inspired and generally entertaining atmosphere, thus leaving "Brotherhood of the Wolf" (Fit for a superhero film or not, that is actually one awesome title, even if "Le Pacte des loups" literally translates as "The Pact of the Wolves"; that "Brotherhood" makes all the difference) to stand as an engaging and rewarding period mystery, thriller, adventure piece, political study, horror piece, action piece, fantasy piece and drama... or whatever it is. 3/5 - Good
    Cameron J Super Reviewer

Brotherhood of the Wolf Quotes

There are no approved quotes yet for this movie.

Movie & TV guides