Daredevil - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

Daredevil Reviews

July 14, 2015
It isn't a great film, or even a greatly original one. Still, it has many grace notes, and interesting oddities.
July 14, 2015
Much of the rest of Daredevil is so dark that you can't see it. I don't think you're missing a great deal.
July 14, 2015
When Farrell's on screen, Daredevil becomes more than just a finely tuned entertainment machine. In a movie that will rake people in no matter what, it's fun to see something unexpected.
July 13, 2015
There's good stuff in the margins. But on the heels of such successful comic-book adaptations as X-Men and Spider-Man, Johnson's film makes Daredevil look like the second-rate hero he never really was.
July 7, 2010
Torn between moody grandiosity and cartoonish mayhem, Daredevil tries to have it both ways, and succeeds at neither.
April 18, 2007
[A] dull actioner.
January 26, 2006
Convincing in the physical demands of the role, Affleck persuades us of the pain of sightlessness and supersensitive hearing, although writer/director Johnson's scrappy construction fails him and everyone else as the showdown approaches.
February 20, 2003
The movie has far less emotional weight than, say, Spider-Man.
February 19, 2003
The numerous fight scenes have been filmed in Confuse-o-Rama, a headache-inducing technique that mixes a dozen too many cuts per minute, projectile P.O.V., and intermittent glimpses of the hero's sonar sensorium.
February 19, 2003
A collection of false starts interrupted by an awful lot of angst-ridden contemplation, the picture serves up soul-searching gush with scant pulse-pounding rush.
February 18, 2003
Daredevil has electric energy, a wickedly dark sense of humor, some ingenious fight scenes and that high-powered cast.
February 15, 2003
Kind of lousy.
February 14, 2003
Perfectly satisfactory without being deeply satisfying.
February 14, 2003
Daredevil doesn't take a single dare.
February 14, 2003
A pretender in the realm of bona fide superheroes.
February 14, 2003
There'll be plenty of ragging to go around once audiences get a dose of the dullest live-action comic strip on record, one that lacks even an interesting villain.
Read More | Original Score: 1.5/4
February 14, 2003
Even in February, it feels like the worst movie of the year.
Full Review | Original Score: 1/5
February 14, 2003
Marvel's on a roll.
Full Review | Original Score: 3/4
February 14, 2003
With the appearance in movie theaters of Daredevil, we have now officially arrived at the bottom of the comic-book pile.
Read More | Original Score: .5/4
February 14, 2003
One of the biggest misfires in its genre since Godzilla.
Full Review | Original Score: 1/4
February 14, 2003
Daredevil isn't laugh-out -loud lousy, it's something worse: deeply, depressingly average.
Read More | Original Score: 2/4
February 14, 2003
After sundry Batmans and last summer's Spider-Man, the comic-book formula of childhood loss, filial revenge, and freakish physical prowess doesn't seem all that fresh anymore.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4
February 14, 2003
The action almost never stops, which is both Daredevil's biggest asset and its greatest shortcoming.
Full Review | Original Score: 3/5
February 14, 2003
The best Marvel movie to date.
Read More | Original Score: A
February 14, 2003
Completely devoid of subtlety or sense, the film is a series of bad scenes connected by empty characters, most of whom seem like leftovers from scripts abandoned long ago.
Full Review | Original Score: D
February 14, 2003
A well-crafted introductory course.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4
February 14, 2003
Too hollow and pedestrian to dramatize the conflict between its hero's vigilante streak and his moral straits imaginatively.
Read More | Original Score: 2/4
February 14, 2003
Not woeful, not wonderful, merely watchable.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4
February 14, 2003
A decent version of a comic book brought to the big screen with moments of gleaming intensity.
Read More | Original Score: B-
February 14, 2003
Plays closer to the Joel Schumacher campy sequel Batman & Robin: convoluted, junky and obsessed with form-fitting leather costumes.
Full Review | Original Score: 1/4
February 14, 2003
The flick misses the bull's-eye by such a length that nobody except hard-core fanboys and leather fetishists will be panting for the sequel promised at the end.
Full Review | Original Score: 1.5/4
February 14, 2003
The movie is actually pretty good.
Full Review | Original Score: 3/4
February 14, 2003
The maroon couch-suit is kind of cool and it's fun to watch him suck face with Jennifer Garner. But in the end, Ben Affleck can't make us forget that other red-costumed New York superhero.
February 13, 2003
The dialogue is dreadful, a stale sort of hokum that wouldn't make the cut at Marvel Comics.
Read More | Original Score: 2/4
February 13, 2003
Second-rate and ordinary.
February 13, 2003
A dull waste of a compelling comic-book character.
Full Review | Original Score: D+
February 13, 2003
While Daredevils' title role proves to be a snug fit for Ben Affleck, the movie itself sags in all the wrong places.
February 13, 2003
For all its ambition, Daredevil can't overcome the fact that at its colorful center lies a perfect blank in a bad suit.
Read More | Original Score: 2/4
February 13, 2003
Daredevil is slick, expensive and filled with good-looking actors flexing muscles, but once it grabs our attention it doesn't really reward it.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/4
February 13, 2003
A grimly glam superhero tale that doesn't quite dare to hit the heights.
Read More | Original Score: B
February 12, 2003
Daredevil, in this movie at least, is little more than a hollow clone of Batman and Spider-Man, with far less idiosyncrasy than either.
Full Review | Original Score: C-
February 12, 2003
Sometimes, you can tell when parts of a movie have been left on the cutting room floor, and that's the case with Daredevil.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4