Watch it now

For Your Eyes Only Photos

View All Photos (20)

Cast

Roger Moore
as James Bond

Lois Maxwell
as Moneypenny

James Villiers
as Tanner

Carole Bouquet
as Melina Havelock

Julian Glover
as Aristotle Kristatos

Topol
as Columbo

Lynn-Holly Johnson
as Bibi Dahl

Cassandra Harris
as Countess Lisl

Jill Bennett
as Jacoba Brink

Michael Gothard
as Emile Locque

John Wyman
as Erik Kriegler

Jack Hedley
as Havelock

Desmond Llewelyn
as Q

Geoffrey Keen
as Minister of Defense

John Wells
as Denis

Janet Brown
as Prime Minister

Walter Gotell
as General Gogol

John Moreno
as Ferrara

Koko

Charles Dance
as Claus

Paul Angelis
as Karageorge

Toby Robins
as Iona Havelock

Jack Klaff
as Apostis

Alkis Kritikos
as Santos

Stag Theodore
as Nikos

Stefan Kalipha
as Gonzales

Graham Crowden
as 1st Sea Lord

Noel Johnson
as Vice Admiral

William Hoyland
as McGregor

Paul Brooke
as Bunky

Eva Reuber-Staier
as Rublevich

Fred Bryant
as Vicar

Robbin Young
as Girl in Flower Shop

Graham Hawkes
as Mantis Man

Max Vesterhalt
as Girl at Casino

Lalla Dean
as Girl at Pool

Evelyn Drogue
as Bond Beauty

Laoura Hadzivageli
as Bond Beauty

Chai Lee
as Bond Beauty

Kim Mills
as Bond Beauty

Caroline Cossey
as Bond Beauty

Vanya
as Bond Beauty

Viva
as Bond Beauty

Lizzie Warville
as Bond Beauty

Alison Worth
as Bond Beauty

John Hollis
as Unnamed Blofeld (uncredited)

View All

News & Interviews for For Your Eyes Only

Critic Reviews for For Your Eyes Only

Audience Reviews for For Your Eyes Only

• Nov 19, 2015

  As dark and satisfying as the Roger Moore era of Bond ever got, For Your Eyes Only lacks the tongue-in-cheek thrills of the series overall but makes up for it with the actor's best and most nuanced performance of the superspy ever. Indeed, gets downright murderous in this, the most sobering chapter since On Her Majesty's Secret Service. The action soars, the story fires on all cylinders, and Tevye from Fiddler on the Roof makes an excellent sidekick in what would've and should've made for an excellent swan song for Moore. In this PG-rated spy adventure, Agent 007 (Moore) gets assigned to hunt for a lost British encryption device and prevent it from falling into enemy hands. Just freeze-frame on that scene where a foot soldier pleads for his life as his car sits teetering on the edge of a crumbling Cliffside. Without a trace of his trademark grin hiding the tongue in his cheek, Moore kicks the vehicle and the henchman into nevermore. The Living Daylights gets credited for taking 007 into dark waters, but For Your Eyes Only deserves plaudits for this first strike. Unlike the film that would follow eight years later, however, Moore's personal best take on the character manages to stay better rooted to the franchise, which would celebrate its 20th anniversary a year later. Bottom line: The Eyes Have It
  Jeff B Super Reviewer
• Oct 30, 2015

  Now I may be alone on this one, but "For Your Eyes Only" is easily one of the best bond films of the series. It is definitely the best film of the Roger Moore lead films. The action is cranked up to eleven here and the story does not really take slow turn. You are always on the edge of your seat and I cared about all of the characters involved. Roger Moore is great as a more serious bond in this picture and the villain really gives him a run for his money. When talking about a bond film, it really comes down to the actor portraying him, the action set pieces, and if the story is intriguing. Overall, "For Your Eyes Only" is a fantastic film!
  

  KJ P Super Reviewer
• Oct 24, 2015

  For awhile the Bond films used the same old plot, villain archeotype, and tone. But I found For Your Eyes Only to break that streak of tongue and cheek Bond films to virtually follow the same old story to get where they wanted to go. There are still quite a few tongue and cheek moments, especially with the out of place Bibi character, but I think the stakes are higher as are the quality of the action sequences. It's not my favorite of the bunch either, but I found it to be a nice change up for the franchise. I think by far the best asset this film has is its unpredictability. It had a knack for keeping characters around just enough for us to care and short enough to where we don't grow tired of them. Which is why when some of them die, you feel the weight of their death. On the other hand, sometimes the story itself becomes full of itself. The villains and there motivations become convoluted and discombobulated. It may be the first complex Bond film of the series. But people aren't watching for the complex plot and characters, they want to see Bond in action. The action is great although I think they once again rehashed chase scenes and settings. I don't know what it is about this series, but they love filming underwater action, and ski chases. We got similar chases in On Her Majesty's Secret Service and The Spy Who Loved Me a few years before. The underwater setting has been used just as much. As exumbernat as the action and settings are, the characters are far less flashy and filled with much more mystery. The lead villains don't have an island, or an underwater city, or a secret nuclear factory, but they are just as maniacal. Speaking of maniacal, I really enjoyed the opening sequence with Bond presumably killing Blofeld once and for all. It was good to see another whole film not be centered around him. Plus, this film also has a few Game of Thrones links with Julian Glover's Kristatos and a subtle nod to Diana Rigg's Teresa from an earlier Bond film. Always have to link it back to Westeros. +Darker Bond with more stakes +But still has some tongue and cheek humor +Opening +Complex and less flashy -Rehashed action settings 7.3/10
  

  Thomas D Super Reviewer
• Aug 03, 2015

  Probably one of the better Bonds from the pretty poor Roger Moore era, It's very easy to watch and enjoy, Apart from a few silly bits it had some good action scenes especially the ski chase and the rock climbing scene were both pretty good, There's a nice little car chase but apart from them there's nothing else new or worth mentioning I don't think it was too overlong but too many down times make it seems longer than it is, An average Bond film but an above average Roger Moore Bond film.
  Jamie C Super Reviewer

For Your Eyes Only Quotes

News & Features