The Conjuring 2 (2016)
TOMATOMETER
AUDIENCE SCORE
Critic Consensus: The Conjuring 2 can't help but lose a bit of its predecessor's chilly sting through familiarity, but what remains is still a superior ghost story told with spine-tingling skill.
The Conjuring 2 Videos
The Conjuring 2 Photos
Movie Info
Watch it now
Cast
as Lorraine Warren
as Ed Warren
as Peggy Hodgson
as Janet Hodgson
as Margaret Hodgson
as Johnny Hodgson
as Billy Hodgson
as Peggy Nottingham
as Vic Nottingham
as Anita Gregory
as Maurice Grosse
as Bill Wilkins
as Demon Voice
as Demon Nun
as Crooked Man
as Harry Whitmark
as Graham Morris
as Judy Warren
as Kent Allen
as Constable Heeps
as Constable Peterson
as Talk Show Host
as Skeptic Kaplan
as Demon
as Camilla
as Mrs. More
as Lollipop Woman
as Drew
as Audience Member
as Louise Defeo
as Audience Member
as Peter
News & Interviews for The Conjuring 2
Critic Reviews for The Conjuring 2
All Critics (227) | Top Critics (32) | Fresh (180) | Rotten (47) | DVD (1)
Wan's expert deployment of genre jolts is no less in evidence this time around, but as he takes his time - perhaps even a bit too much of it - interweaving the Warrens' story with that of the Hodgsons... he crafts a deep dive into dread.
[Wan's] framing of the scares is artfully managed, and it is the accomplished Wolfe, rather than any monster, who takes true possession of the tale.
You always get the sense that the Hodgsons are being targeted by something that is truly out of their control, and that's the biggest scare of all.
There are only so many times a slamming door will get an audience to jump.
A supernatural winner bound to make some noise at the box office and worthy of loud applause.
Much longer, more elaborate, more dramatic, and more packed with chilling moments and hair-raising visuals than one could anticipate, even from Wan.
Audience Reviews for The Conjuring 2
Decent sequel with some truly scary parts. The female ghost in particular was gruesome and real nightmare material! The 70's setting from the previous works well again here too. This era always seems creepier to me than modern day settings. The characters were well built and sympathetic too being a struggling single mum and her three kids. The squalid state of the house worked well with the creepiness going on within. Some parts were a bit hammy and silly, but overall a success.
Super Reviewer
The action moves to London as our plucky paranormal investigators delve into some Brit culture for their supernatural face-off. It's not bad, but there's some predictability that squelches the fun quotient. And don't ask that things make sense.
Super Reviewer
Word on the Ouiji board had us believe that James Wan was walking away from horror movies. He ventured into the Fast and Furious action franchise (with its 7th instalment) and stated his intention to leave the horror genre behind. However, his nostalgic frightener The Conjuring in 2013 was such a resounding success that Wan decided to return and take charge of its sequel. Often with sequels, they fail to deliver on the predecessor's success but Wan still has a few tricks up his sleeve. In the London borough of Enfield in 1977, single mother Peggy Hodgson (Frances O'Connor) believes that something evil and malevolent lurks in her house. When her young daughter Janet (Madison Wolfe) starts to display signs of demonic possession, Peggy reaches out to the church and the media to provide help. News soon travels to American paranormal investigators Ed and Lorraine Warren (Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga) who find that the spirit that's plaguing the family has also been plaguing themselves for years. Opening on a seance that takes us back to the mass murder of the Amityville story James Wan employs some stylistic directorial flourishes that set this film up on a strong footing. His feel and rhythm for the material is apparent from the offset and his use of camera angles lend an unnerving atmosphere to the proceedings. After such a striking opening, he slows events down and introduces new characters and a new location. However, the haunted house routine is, once again, at the forefront and the usual horror tropes are on full view; creaking doors, knocks on the walls, vibrating beds and disembodied voices from the darkest corners of a room. It's credit then to Wan that they don't feel overused or even stale for that matter. The narrative is helped by relocating to England where, what is essentially a retread, feels like a new chapter in the paranormal dealings of the Warrens and Wan introduces a new demonic presence that looks like Marilyn Manson in a nuns habit. This may sound ridiculous but it's a very unsettling entity and Wan also throws in creepy ghostly images of a 72 year old man that refuses to leave the house (or the family) alone. What doesn't work so well is a subplot involving zoetrope character The Crooked Man. It's shoehorned in to give a young side character something to do and feels almost like an attempt to provide another future tie-in horror film (much like the doll Annabelle that originated from the first instalment). It just doesn't work and provides absolutely nothing to the story at hand and its omission could have saved 20mins from Wan's slightly overlong running time. For the most part, though, Wan wrings out the terror with a very assured hand. He builds assuredly and allows the horror to creep in with the occasional image or revelation hidden in a corner of the frame. In doing so, there are several efficient jump-scares and hairs on necks and moments and that's ultimately how I judge a horror. Admittedly, there are issues and contrivances in the story and the "based on a true events" angle has caused controversy but Wan's ability to stage a creepy scene is hugely effective and he delivers a package that does exactly what it sets out to do. Horror films of late seem to have taken a much needed look at themselves and there have actually been some notable inclusions in recent years. With James Wan returning to this platform, it will do the genre no harm whatsoever. Mark Walker
Super Reviewer