A Night to Remember

Critics Consensus

No consensus yet.

100%

TOMATOMETER

Total Count: 21

90%

Audience Score

User Ratings: 10,444

Where to watch

Rate And Review

User image

Verified

  • User image

    Super Reviewer

    Rate this movie

    Oof, that was Rotten.

    Meh, it passed the time.

    It’s good – I’d recommend it.

    Awesome!

    So Fresh: Absolute Must See!

    What did you think of the movie? (optional)



  • You're almost there! Just confirm how you got your ticket.

  • User image

    Super Reviewer

    Step 2 of 2

    How did you buy your ticket?

    Let's get your review verified.

    • Fandango

    • AMCTheatres.com or AMC AppNew

    • Cinemark Coming Soon

      We won’t be able to verify your ticket today, but it’s great to know for the future.

    • Regal Coming Soon

      We won’t be able to verify your ticket today, but it’s great to know for the future.

    • Theater box office or somewhere else

    You're almost there! Just confirm how you got your ticket.

  • User image

    Super Reviewer

    Rate this movie

    Oof, that was Rotten.

    Meh, it passed the time.

    It’s good – I’d recommend it.

    Awesome!

    So Fresh: Absolute Must See!

    What did you think of the movie? (optional)

  • How did you buy your ticket?

    • Fandango

    • AMCTheatres.com or AMC AppNew

    • Cinemark Coming Soon

      We won’t be able to verify your ticket today, but it’s great to know for the future.

    • Regal Coming Soon

      We won’t be able to verify your ticket today, but it’s great to know for the future.

    • Theater box office or somewhere else

A Night to Remember Photos

Movie Info

The sinking of the Titanic is presented in a highly realistic fashion in this tense British drama. The disaster is portrayed largely from the perspective of the ocean liner's second officer, Charles Lightoller (Kenneth More). Despite numerous warnings about ice, the ship sails on, with Capt. Edward John Smith (Laurence Naismith) keeping it going at a steady clip. When the doomed vessel finally hits an iceberg, the crew and passengers discover that they lack enough lifeboats, and tragedy follows.

Cast & Crew

Kenneth More
Second Officer Charles Herbert Lightoller
David McCallum
Harold Bride
Honor Blackman
Mrs. Liz Lucas
Jill Dixon
Mrs. Clarke
Laurence Naismith
Capt. Edward John Smith
Frank Lawton
J. Bruce Ismay
Alec McCowen
Harold Thomas Cottam
George Rose
Chief Baker Charles Joughin
Ronald Allen
Mr. Clarke
Robert Ayres
Maj. Arthur Peuchen
Eric Ambler
Screenwriter
Show all Cast & Crew

Critic Reviews for A Night to Remember

All Critics (21) | Top Critics (4) | Fresh (21)

  • [A Night to Remember] is a motion picture that will long be remembered for the manner in which it has dramatized cold fact, and given the suspense and the excitement usually engendered only by fiction.

    July 1, 2020 | Full Review…
  • A restrained, nearly austere ensemble drama that manages to intertwine a dozen different stories without tripping up on any of them, it relies on real-life survivor testimony for almost every line and incident, to immensely moving and dignified effect.

    April 13, 2012 | Rating: 4/5 | Full Review…
  • Cold and brutal - exactly how this tale should be told.

    April 12, 2012 | Rating: 4/5 | Full Review…
  • Baker cuts to the chase - the iceberg strikes 30 minutes in - and maintains tension with consummate skill: not an easy task when the outcome is already known.

    April 10, 2012 | Rating: 5/5 | Full Review…
  • While the special effects may not hold a candle to the Academy Award winning work in Cameron's film, they're still quite impressive given the period, and Baker manages to infuse the film with an unflagging sense of authenticity.

    August 6, 2019 | Rating: 3.5/4 | Full Review…
  • 1950s British take on Titanic tragedy is a masterpiece.

    May 18, 2012 | Rating: 5/5 | Full Review…

Audience Reviews for A Night to Remember

  • Apr 12, 2016
    This film wastes little time spending only ten minutes leading up to the night of April 12 and the circumstances of the sinking of the Titanic. Unfairly, when watching this, it will ultimately be compared with the 1997 James Cameron film, but at times this Roy Ward Baker film surpasses Cameron's. The most magnificent thing about the film is the way the camera starts to slant as the ship starts to sink. The film also doesn't focus too much attention on any one or two characters as it bounces back and forth in its narrative only on the survivors, who recounted their story to author Walter Lord. The upper class may seem incredibly archaic at times due to their total indifference to the lower classes on the ship showing truly how monstrous they were. Great special effects make this a lasting and enjoyable film.
    Joseph B Super Reviewer
  • Apr 16, 2015
    A Night to Remember recounts the tragic tale of the sinking of the R.M.S. Titanic on its maiden voyage after it struck an iceberg in the North Atlantic. Based on Walter Lord's bestselling book, the film follows various Titanic passengers and crew throughout the sinking, along with the rescue efforts (or lack thereof) of the Californian and Carpathia. This is simultaneously the film's greatest strength and weakness; as it allow for an expansive overview of events, but also makes it difficult to get to know individual characters. The model work and special effects are pretty good (for the time), and give a real sense of scope to the tragedy. However, the score is rather bland and doesn't have much emotional resonance to it. Still, while A Night to Remember has some weaknesses, it delivers a compelling portrayal of one of the greatest maritime disasters in history.
    Dann M Super Reviewer
  • Apr 07, 2012
    It's "The Titanic Adventure", but unlike "Poseidon", this really happened. I guess that's why they couldn't get Ernest Borgnine for this film; too many painful memories from when he was rescued from the actual Titanic, back when he was in his 50s. It truly was a night to remember, even if you are slipping into senility, something Mr. Borgnine is certainly not slipping into, because if that disaster couldn't kill him, then there's no way alzheimer's is gonna take him out. Wow, I am going the distance with this bogus joke about Ernest Bornine being old enough to have actually been on the Titanic, and, as I said, he's not even in this film. I guess I have to reach for some kind of reference to a star, because, with the exception of Sean Conney, who made some random cameo somewhere in the film, the people in this are such unknowns that, for a seconds there, I thought that they had died in an actual recreation of the Titanic sinking. Of course, then I heard the dialogue, and it quickly hit me that this is anything but authentic pandemonium, because I doubt that they would be knocking out terrible snap-liners during pure, horrifying disaster. Hey, that doesn't make the film any less exciting, partially because the film couldn't get any less exciting. No, the film does really hit some high points in tension, but if you want some consistency in those thrills aboard the Titanic, then wait about 39 years, because as enjoyable as this film is, it's not without its slip-ups. The film slips a bit from the get-go, rushing atmospheric exposition and pumping out steam, which already found itself diluted by under informative, yet still overlong and repetitive openings for our leads. The film goes immediately underdeveloped and immediately disengaging, but something that is most certainly not immediate is the film's picking up. The film is slow and loose, limply procrastinating, which isn't to say that I wanted them to waste no time in throwing us in the middle of emotional terror before we had even established resonance with the situation, because at that point, it would have been spectacle over substance, but it is to say that the film makes ends meet with dry padding. For the padded-out length, to even the poor dialogue, so much of the substance feels so artificial, and sure, I understand that's how they rolled in the '50s, even in the final years of the era, but that's still no real excuse, partially because it throws some mild inconsistency in the intellegence of the film. The film boasts historical accuracy and ambition, but its substance goes diluted, due to its usage of forced charm and over meditation on characters as cheap substitutes for exposition. It's a false, overlong, lifeless bore of a disaster that could rival the actual Titanic sinking... but enough about "Eyes Wide Shut". Seriously though, this film certainly stands to be better, but it could have fallen so spectacularly flat, as well, yet it goes saved by its ultimately prevailing moments of genuine effectiveness, largely spawned from effective production values. Now, don't go expecting these production designs to be the 1950s practical equivalent of Jim Cameron's later-to-arrive digital recreation of the sinking, but do expect some pretty impressive usage of the, as Wikipedia put it, "modest" production values. The reconstruction of the Titanic's rooms and exterior are pretty dead-on, and when things start sinking, shaking and falling apart at the seams, you feel it; maybe not all the time, but when things go down, they really hit, and part of that effectiveness lays in the quality of the build-up. Sure, maybe the film takes a little bit too long with the pre-pandemonium, but when push comes to shove, while the film doesn't quite deliver terribly sharply on the emotional aspects of the disaster, it certainly gives you a sense of tension, really playing up the accuracies to hit you, though not bear down and manipulate you. As cheesy as the writing is, the early stages of the colorful characters and story charm you, and as things begin to bash down, you see a lot of characters shift and do things that really catch you offguard. Again, if exposition was sharper, and writing with it, then things would have really hit with more subtlety, but as it stands, the film keeps you going through the slow and wakes you up when things get heavy. Its charm resides within its workmanlike moments, but its style and tension reside in the moments where the limited resources find themselves used to great effect, and while the film won't stick with you terribly thoroughly, it is still rather "a film to remember". Yup, all of that repetition, just to get to a joke about the title; but hey it's still a pretty decent movie anyways. At the end of this night, limited exposition and padding dull down a film tainted by shoddy writing and bit of a shortage on emotion, but the film boasts enough charm throughout the more relaxed moments to keep you going, and when disaster comes into play, the sharp production and authenticity power the intrigue and tension that help in making "A Night to Remember" a generally impacing and interesting classic study on the final hours of the "Unsinkable" Ship. 2.5/5 - Fair
    Cameron J Super Reviewer
  • Aug 03, 2011
    R.M.S Titanic- 100 years ago today 1912-2012 This year being the centenary of R.M.S Titanic's sinking, I would decide to review this classic film depicting the most famous sea disaster of the 20th century. Now before I review the film, I just want to say that I didn't enjoy the 1997 version of Titanic, I just felt it was a film that had too much fiction and unnecessary drama that tried too hard at over doing the suffering and pain of that horrible tragedy. I thought Cameron had a great eye for the film, but the romantic storyline absolutely ruined the film for me. I see that film as a blunder, and I just hated the fact that they mostly had to sugar the facts with a purposely tear jerking love story, as a person who's very much intrigued by the story of Titanic I was very disappointed with that film. However, A Night to Remember is a film I highly recommend to viewers who want the true story of the Titanic. With this film you get the facts, not fiction. Brilliantly directed by Roy Ward Backer, A Night to Remember is a cinematic classic that tells the true story of the greatest ship ever made. The cast assembled here for this production is phenomenal. I've been fascinated with the Titanic since I was a young kid, and now I'm in my mid to late twenties. This film is superb, it has everything you want that would please a Titanic buff. A Night to Remember is dramatic and suspenseful, and one key element that makes this a worthy film to watch is that it's an accurate portrait of the disaster. The film is brilliant and a flawless piece of cinema. The actors on-screen deliver memorable performances as well. The film is a much more accomplished film compared to the massively overrated Titanic, and if you're interested in the facts about the tragedy, this is the film to watch. After all these years, A Night to Remember remains the definitive Titanic film. James Cameron's film is nothing compared to this one. More accurate, better acting, and hold true to the facts, it's no secret that this film remains a favorite of Titanic enthusiasts the world over. Not only is A Night to Remember a memorable film that accurately portrays this famous disaster, this is a cinematic classic that should be seen by film enthusiasts everywhere. Watching this film, you may agree that it's far superior to the typical Hollywood love story that James Cameron gas made. I think that this is a phenomenal picture and is terrific tribute to the victims that died during the sinking. A brilliantly acted piece of cinema that delivers drama and suspense from start to finish. Forget the sappy purposely tear jerkin love sick Cameron version that relies more on fiction, and pick up this one instead.
    Alex r Super Reviewer

A Night to Remember Quotes

There are no approved quotes yet for this movie.

Movie & TV guides