Blow Out - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

Blow Out Reviews

Page 1 of 37
½ May 20, 2017
John Travolta's finest performance.
April 14, 2017
You know, De Palma tried and tried to ripoff Hitchock but finally his own imitation had become its own style. Blow Out, one of the best movies of the 1980's, is the first example of that.
November 25, 2016
Good performances by Travolta and Lithgow.
November 7, 2016
Fun to watch. Travolta is very good.
August 24, 2016
Seeng a crime mystery from a different perspective was the most compelling part of this movie.
Super Reviewer
½ August 8, 2016
Stunningly shot conspiracy-theory thriller, with fantastic use of (then) current technology and particularly great editing and sound editing. The debts to Hitchcock and the film Blow Out are writ large but hugely enjoyable, and Travolta and Lithgow are very watchable.
August 7, 2016
Extremely interesting thriller

One of the best political thrillers and one of Brian de Palma's best films, Blow Out features John Travolta in top notch performance as a sound engineer for an independent film making company in Philadelphia which specializes in cheesy soft-porn/slasher films: while out recording night sounds on a creekside for his audio library he sees a car plunge into the water and dives in to save the female passenger but too late to save the male driver, who turns out to be a leading candidate for the US presidency. Later, he realizes from the sounds he recorded that the blow out which caused the accident was caused by a gunshot, something which understandably the powers that be don't want known. Nancy Allen's deliberately flighty performance as the rescued woman provides a perfect foil to Travolta's solidness, and the convoluted plot unfolds through both obvious and subtle allusions to historical events (Chappaquiddick, Dallas) and classic cinema (the title's resemblance to Blow Up is not accidental, and the scenes of mayhem in public venues like a large train station or a patriotic fireworks display where the crowds have no idea what's happening are very Hitchcockian.) Rated R for elements which don't seem all that shocking today. An extremely interesting film. The Criterion special edition DVD is as good as you would expect.
July 26, 2016
Jack Terry: "No one wants to know about conspiracy any more!"
June 15, 2016
Quite a good thriller with Travolta playing a more humble role that usual.
½ May 1, 2016
I had seen this Brian De Palma film so many years ago I didn't remember it at all. I was glad to re-watch it in HD, it looks great, and really shows was a technical expert De Palma is at the art of cinema. There is direct influence from "Blow-Up" and "The Conversation", and of course nods to Hitchcock. Travolta is great in this, and John Lithgow is super creepy, I had forgotten he was in this, but he's similar to how he was in the show "Dexter". Highly recommended!
March 28, 2016
Unconvincing Hitchcockian conspiracy thriller. Derivative. Uninvolving.Most interesting thing is its Philadelphia setting - and its 70's pre-digital gadgetry.
Travolta's slow motion sprint at end displays all that is wrong with the film - it's all fake and for effect only.
SPOILER ALERT. Should we even remember that Sally was responsible for Manny's death (defending herself from rape)? I know the obedient media will probably report it as an "accident", but still it's a loose end I didn't like left hanging, especially in a thriller.
½ February 10, 2016
John Travolta plays the soundman 'Jack Terri'. While out one night recording effects, he witnesses and inadvertently records what he believes to be car accident; of which a tyre 'blows out' and a couple's car careens off a bridge into a river. After he can only save the female occupant Sally (Nancy Allen), he learns that her dead companion was a Presidential Candidate. Jack plays back his recording and notices the sound of a gunshot, before the sound of a blown out tyre. This compiles a series of events whereby Jack takes it upon himself to prove his theory and seek justice for a murder and not a freak accident.

It can be argued that the story is very basic for a political thriller, however the style and direction of it, takes it to a level of superiority for its genre. Brian de Palma includes great attention to detail and there is a very good dose of suspense throughout his scenes. This means that we, the audience, are not at all sidetracked by the unoriginality of its premise. The acting. Well, Travolta, the protagonist, is superb. He has an element of likeability throughout and portrays such a natural performance; operating in an impressively smooth, efficient and effortless way. Nancy Allen, is not so good. Her portrayal of a ditsy blonde escort almost becomes annoying at times. There are elements to her character but the term 'overacting' comes to mind and her performance can only be described as weak. John Lithgow has to get a mention too. Rarely have I seen a character stoically walk his way through the film as a ruthless killer and carry out such an emotionless and callous role to such great effect.
This is one of the finest films about the process of film-making. It tends to have an old fashioned noir quality, with the momentum building upon mood and suspense. It is enjoyably stylish, if simple, but obtains a good balance. De Palma has an art of stylishly blending his scenes together. Both the directing of De Palma and cinematography of Vilmos Zsigmond is highly impressive. From beautifully shot scenes in the vein of Francis Ford Coppola, to the drastic suspense of Hitchcock, all the best tricks in the book are used here.
The ending of the film is set up for a heroic conclusion in the traditional Hollywood mold, but instead the famous 'scream' climax and the haunting epilogue that follows serve as a reminder that with political progress always comes a loss. This generates element of realism, which you find is present throughout.
But a particular mention must go to the opening of the film, which is absolutely brilliant; instantly engaging you and unwittingly getting you on board for the duration. It seems De Palma recognises that at the time of this release, the popular films were that of slasher and science fiction. He uses the opening scene to almost play a joke and show his movement away from horrors and harking back to similar 1970s classic political thrillers like 'The Parrallax View'. De Palma's masterly film conflates Antonioni's Blow-Up and Coppola's 'The Conversation' to produce a potent brew of conspiracy theory and cinematic virtuosity, that is all his own.

9/10 Great film
February 1, 2016
Probably Brian De Palma's best film, and one of the best films of the '80s.
January 28, 2016
De Palma continued working on his style of the genre here, also it's one of the few genres almost practically made for Travolta.
½ January 16, 2016
From the very opening the normal erocism of DePalma is in full speed. The seeds are all there and I was a little worried before it's revealed to be a crappy slasher film production that Travolta is doing sound work on. This basically sets into motion a thriller from the 80s that like most of DePalmas films throw logic to the wind. The whole coverup is so hilariously silly it is just one thing you need to overcome pretty quickly otherwise this won't work for you. Not the greatest film but it works very well and is one of the better films of DePalmas
½ December 28, 2015
beautiful shots of an analogue time long gone
December 14, 2015
Two stars, only because getting one star requires at least some effort at comedy. This movie was a dreadful mishmash of nonsensical plot details smeared haphazardly over some clever camera shots and themes stolen from Blowup and The Conversation. In fairness to Travolta, who really isn't my favorite actor, he did the best he could with a ridiculous script. Nancy Allen's acting was so whiny and insufferable I wanted to kill her myself. The bast acting in the film goes to John Lithgow for our homicidal villain. What he obviously lacks in credibility as a badass, he makes up for with creep factor. He could have convinced me he was a serial killer, a child molester or a registered Republican. Truly frightening.

But the story. What was good wasn't original and what was original wasn't good. A gunshot takes out the front drivers' side tire of a moving car, in the dark, from a distance, (nonsense) causing the car to careen wildly into a creek (nonsense). A B-movie soundman records it all and knows from the beginning what he heard (nonsense). He dives into the creek, at night, in the dark and manages to see into the car and see what he knows is a woman and a dead man (nonsense). In the pitch-black, underwater, he saves the woman (really really unlikely). The story from there is all about him trying to get someone to believe he recorded this unlikely and silly murder plot. The villain even creeps into the police impound and successfully change the tire on the car to hide evidence of the bullet-hole (highly unlikely - both that he could do this, and if he could, why not use these amazing skills to assassinate the politician with a less convoluted, more reliable method to begin with?). The story was set in 1981. There were cassette tapes. Why did the genius soundman rely on annoying cumbersome real-to-real tape? Why didn't he transfer the taped murder to cassette and why didn't he make ten or twelve copies of it? What of the last ten minutes of the movie? The ridiculous car chase scene? Escaping from an ambulance to chase down the killer, with no police keeping an eye on the nut in the Jeep who almost killed countless bystanders? (Nonsense). How about the anti-climactic showdown on the roof? All that running and suspense trying to save the annoying chick - she dies anyway. Half of the movie was the hero's wasted effort. He kills the bad guy and somehow escapes it all unseen by cops and witnesses. After he escaped from the ambulance and cops after almost running over half of Philadelphia. (Nonsense). He lets the cops and media somehow draw the conclusion that the murdered girl killed her assailant while being murdered by him. Then the ending. The soundman hero has found the perfect movie scream his employers have been seeking as a subplot all through the movie. It's in his tape-recorded actual screams of the real girl being murdered. Very tasteful. Despite this success, the soundman can't bear to listen to the recorded screams, although he didn't balk at using them for sound effects. I wonder if Travolta can bear watching this idiotic movie. It was almost two hours of my life I'll never get back. By the time it was almost over, I was rooting for Lithgow, praying he would murder DePalma.
½ November 22, 2015
Hauntingly beautiful.
November 7, 2015
Director DePalma recycles the polished tension of Alfred Hitchcock and a premise inspired by Michelangelo Antonioni's 1966 film Blow Out, and applies his own touches of grit, political intrigue, and cinematic homages.
Page 1 of 37