The Hills Have Eyes Part II
1985, Horror, 1h 28m
7 Reviews 10,000+ RatingsYou might also like
Where to watch
Rate And Review
-
What did you think of the movie? (optional)
You're almost there! Just confirm how you got your ticket.
You're almost there! Just confirm how you got your ticket.
What did you think of the movie? (optional)
How did you buy your ticket?
-
Fandango
-
AMCTheatres.com or AMC AppNew
-
Cinemark Coming Soon
We won’t be able to verify your ticket today, but it’s great to know for the future.
-
Regal Coming Soon
We won’t be able to verify your ticket today, but it’s great to know for the future.
-
Theater box office or somewhere else
The Hills Have Eyes Part II Photos
Movie Info
Cast & Crew
Pluto
Cass
Hulk
Bobby
Rachel, Ruby
Roy
Critic Reviews for The Hills Have Eyes Part II
All Critics (7) | Top Critics (1) | Rotten (7)
-
a film destined to be a footnote in Craven's career - but footnotes can often provide real, demythologising insight into both filmmakers and the fickle industry that they serve.
September 11, 2019 | Full Review… -
There are a couple eerie moments, enough to make things creepy from time to time, but ultimately not enough for anyone to call this even remotely a mediocre horror.
May 3, 2019 | Rating: 1/5 | Full Review… -
What could have inspired such lazy filmmaking?
March 23, 2012 | Full Review… -
Quote not available.
July 25, 2005 | Rating: 2/5 -
Might be the only film in cinema history to feature a flashback sequence ... by a DOG!
April 3, 2005 | Rating: 1/5 -
The original was a minor classic. This is just minor.
June 16, 2003 | Rating: 0/5
Audience Reviews for The Hills Have Eyes Part II
-
Apr 03, 2015I swear this music is straight out of the earlier Friday the 13th movies... Either way, if you don't count Mindripper (and you shouldn't), this is the worst of the Hills Have Eyes franchise. Though they do scream a little less, and my ears thank Part II for that.Gimly M Super Reviewer
-
Jun 21, 2012The Hills Have Eyes Part 2 is a poorly constructed horror film that is absolutely pointless. This film lacks anything that made the first film so good. This is one of those films that never should have been made. The film has an uninteresting plot, one that doesn't satisfy. Wes Craven really delivered something original with his original film, but with this one, he misses the mark. The problem with this film is the plot and the poor acting. It's no wonder that Wes Craven disowned this film years later; it's one of his worst along with My Soul to Take. This film fails to build on the success of the first, and it becomes tiresome. The films ends up being without any form of direction or entertaining value and it just ends up being one of those sequels that fails to deliver the entertaining aspects that fans of the first are looking for. I wasn't thrilled with this film, and overall it's a bad film with a poor plot. This is a film that is a poorly constructed film that is all over the pl\ace and you just don't end up being entertained whatsoever by this film. This film was bad and the original film should have been left alone, in my opinion it did not need a sequel. The only thing that this film proves is that some classics don't need a second sequel to cash in on the reputation of the first. Watch the original Craven Cult hit, and avoid this film. This is one of the first bad films by director Wes Craven, and it shows that he didn't put much effort into making a consistent, thrilling and ultimately engaging film. This film fails to deliver in all respects.Alex r Super Reviewer
-
Oct 21, 2011An absolutely pointless sequel to the cult classic.Sylvester K Super Reviewer
-
Dec 04, 2009Yep... even worse than the first. I just couldn't help but laugh at how lame it was. Maybe (if I were old enough at the time) I should have watched it back then to see what kind of thrill factor it left, but in these days it's just boring and dumb.Leigh R Super Reviewer
The Hills Have Eyes, Part 2 Quotes
There are no approved quotes yet for this movie.
Verified