Sep 18, 2019

The Audience Score makes me say... Ouch. This Film did have a lot of "Ouch" Moments, but It was very Redeemable if we're being Honest. It gave Norman a chance at becoming a hero... then broke that down. I can't blame direction on this one seeing as Anthony Perkins was the Mastermind behind the camera most of the time. I could say give it a look but, you may want to rewatch the first two films in order to figure out what in the world is going on.

The Audience Score makes me say... Ouch. This Film did have a lot of "Ouch" Moments, but It was very Redeemable if we're being Honest. It gave Norman a chance at becoming a hero... then broke that down. I can't blame direction on this one seeing as Anthony Perkins was the Mastermind behind the camera most of the time. I could say give it a look but, you may want to rewatch the first two films in order to figure out what in the world is going on.

Aug 14, 2019

Anthony Perkins directs the sequel to the sequel to One of the best movies of all. It's pretty good , I was genuinely surprised , I really expected not to like it. It was funny , the actors were good , and it was more than a little bit twisted . Not much to dislike.

Anthony Perkins directs the sequel to the sequel to One of the best movies of all. It's pretty good , I was genuinely surprised , I really expected not to like it. It was funny , the actors were good , and it was more than a little bit twisted . Not much to dislike.

Jul 19, 2019

It was decent. The script was sort of shoe horned into an theatrical film that seems more suited to television. But with that said, it does have decent scares and some shots were really well handled. The music score was creepy in places as Anthony Perkins had a real handle on his character as well as delivering some tongue in cheek performances. Supposed to be comical but there's a sense that if you laugh, you ruined the movie. If you 'do' laugh, you wonder why. It was shot on the cheap side. But I think why I have this rated so low is primarily the character of the nun. The lady who played her just seemed sort of flat to me. All the other characters worked fine. Norman, Duke, the reporter, the sheriff, all work fine. But the nun character didn't fit into the role. All in all, it works fine. But I think after this one, they should've stopped.

It was decent. The script was sort of shoe horned into an theatrical film that seems more suited to television. But with that said, it does have decent scares and some shots were really well handled. The music score was creepy in places as Anthony Perkins had a real handle on his character as well as delivering some tongue in cheek performances. Supposed to be comical but there's a sense that if you laugh, you ruined the movie. If you 'do' laugh, you wonder why. It was shot on the cheap side. But I think why I have this rated so low is primarily the character of the nun. The lady who played her just seemed sort of flat to me. All the other characters worked fine. Norman, Duke, the reporter, the sheriff, all work fine. But the nun character didn't fit into the role. All in all, it works fine. But I think after this one, they should've stopped.

Jul 01, 2019

seems to make fun of itself. Perkins is hilarious as well.

seems to make fun of itself. Perkins is hilarious as well.

Jun 11, 2019

This underrated sequel is the darkest in the Psycho series. Anthony Perkins directorial debut while Norman turns up the crazy.

This underrated sequel is the darkest in the Psycho series. Anthony Perkins directorial debut while Norman turns up the crazy.

May 09, 2019

Far better then Psycho 2. I love this one and I saw it the theater the day it opened.

Far better then Psycho 2. I love this one and I saw it the theater the day it opened.

Dec 21, 2018

It can not be said to be a bad movie, but it also can not be said to be a very good movie. I thought the film had a rather bad and very unconventional argument; I also thought that the film is a bit unnecessary (since "Psycho II" ended up in a perfect way). I think the film left a lot to be desired and I think the public deserves more. I think it was here that the saga "Psycho" died. I recommend it, but I think there are better movies.

It can not be said to be a bad movie, but it also can not be said to be a very good movie. I thought the film had a rather bad and very unconventional argument; I also thought that the film is a bit unnecessary (since "Psycho II" ended up in a perfect way). I think the film left a lot to be desired and I think the public deserves more. I think it was here that the saga "Psycho" died. I recommend it, but I think there are better movies.

Oct 27, 2018

A good shocking psycho trilogy ever and Anthony Perkins did a magnificent horror director with a dark humor and Hitchcock's spirits.

A good shocking psycho trilogy ever and Anthony Perkins did a magnificent horror director with a dark humor and Hitchcock's spirits.

Oct 26, 2018

Its not scary or anything new in the franchise... its just more of the same. Which is good if you're a fan of the franchise. Anthony Perkins is amazing as usual, portraying Norman perfectly. He does such a great job. The cinematography again is great. Good shots of the Motel/House's exterior, great shot at the coventry to start, and the diner is still cosy and quaint. I'm so glad they haven't changed the formula. Better kills would be nice, as well as adding to his story/legend in meaningful ways.

Its not scary or anything new in the franchise... its just more of the same. Which is good if you're a fan of the franchise. Anthony Perkins is amazing as usual, portraying Norman perfectly. He does such a great job. The cinematography again is great. Good shots of the Motel/House's exterior, great shot at the coventry to start, and the diner is still cosy and quaint. I'm so glad they haven't changed the formula. Better kills would be nice, as well as adding to his story/legend in meaningful ways.

Oct 07, 2018

Lame third installment of this trilogy. Stop making psycho movies.

Lame third installment of this trilogy. Stop making psycho movies.