Luther Reviews

Page 1 of 4
July 1, 2005
even with apparent lack of objectivity, LUTHER proves to be more interesting and more accurate depiction of history than anything recently produced by Hollywood
April 25, 2005
Interessante por natureza (o tema fascinante), o filme perde pontos pela frieza da narrativa e por simplificar idias e alguns acontecimentos fundamentais na vida de Lutero.
December 3, 2004
It glosses over the brilliant monk's dark side and ignores his prejudices completely.
October 22, 2004
Luther is rarely presented as anything other than a preacher. He preaches even in casual conversation.
October 22, 2004
An effective history lesson, but not nearly riveting enough to be as entertaining as it is earnest.
October 22, 2004
An entertaining, well-crafted primer on one of the most important Christian leaders since Jesus Christ.
October 22, 2004
About as swashbuckling as a history lesson gets.
October 7, 2004
July 21, 2004
Luther is the textbook radical: he acts out what his contemporaries merely profess.
November 21, 2003
A few too many amateurish techniques and oversimplified confrontations hold Luther back a notch or two from greatness, and stamp it instead as entertaining Lutheran cheerleading.
November 20, 2003
There are enough sympathetic figures in the Catholic establishment (Matthieu Carriere's Cardinal Cajetan chief among them) to create some sense of historical nuance. Moreover, we get to see some warts of the Reformation.
October 8, 2003
Both as a veteran movie reviewer and long-time Lutheran, I left the theater with the feeling that "Luther" is a good movie about a great man.
October 6, 2003
Shot on 100 locations in three countries and outfitted with impressive props, costumes, art direction and medieval streets, Luther makes up for what it lacks in vigorous storytelling with such production values.
October 6, 2003
There is some valuable historical detail in the script, but Luther's philosophy is simplified and sanitized. The acting is flat and surprisingly uninvolving.
October 5, 2003
So concerned with events that it forgoes ideas, and when your subject is famous for his ideas, ignoring them is doing a great disservice.
October 5, 2003
muddies the historical facts, flatly constructs its major characters as stereotypes, and fails to entertain
October 2, 2003
Heady theological badminton, as vigorously thoughtful as it is piously historical.
October 1, 2003
Though it fails when providing a rounded history of the life of Martin Luther, it succeeds in giving viewers a little taste of the other social factors influencing things during the 16th century in Europe.
October 1, 2003
A throwback to the days when such movies as 'A Man for All Seasons' tackled big religious ideas in the context of significant historical events...
September 30, 2003
I've studied Martin Luther. Joseph Fiennes ruins him.
Page 1 of 4