Adam & Steve Reviews

Page 1 of 2
May 7, 2020
Chester doesn't break any new ground here, yet the film stands out due to an incredible supporting cast that includes Parker Posey, Sally Kirkland, Paul Sand, and Julie Hagerty.
June 16, 2007
A lighthearted look at gay love, and a far more honest and ultimately more touching exploration of the theme than what we got up on Brokeback Mountain.
March 1, 2007
Chester has a good ear for the snappy one-liner and this, plus his obviously hard-earned knowledge of the quirks in the gay mating game, put over his determinedly black romantic comedy.
September 5, 2006
It tries for cheap laughs, gets a couple of them, and whizzes the rest of them right down its pant leg.
June 24, 2006
June 15, 2006
Chester could have used a major rewrite, or at least some serious editing.
June 7, 2006
Chester's script is a series of set pieces that all contain exaggerated characters for comic effect. There are numerous one-liners that hit the mark and the central relationship follows its ups and downs along the lines of a conventional romantic comedy w
May 12, 2006
Clever, liberatingly silly and sweet.
May 12, 2006
A clunky doofus, a comedy of meet-cutes and weak jokes.
May 11, 2006
I can't think of another film in which the embarrassment over a freak bowel movement impedes the course of love and commitment.
April 21, 2006
Starting your film with a display of public incontinence isn't the best way to win over the audience.
April 21, 2006
Adam & Steve does distinguish itself from its fellow gay comedies -- in exactly one way: It's possibly the most low-brow of the lot.
April 19, 2006
Adam & Steve mainly goes to prove that indie gay romantic comedies can be just as witless, vulgar and over the top as their straight, major studio counterparts.
April 14, 2006
Pure amateur-hour stuff: a low-budget, poorly written gay movie that revolves around a crude joke and repeatedly delivers embarrassment when it's supposed to be offering humor.
April 14, 2006
[Chester] and the goofy Gets make a likable comedy team.
April 7, 2006
So awkwardly directed by star Chester that its timing and tone are hopelessly uneven.
April 7, 2006
Plays as urban farce, but thanks to first-time director Chester's light touch and affectionally observant eye and ear, it's also a genuinely affecting love story.
April 7, 2006
Material is uneven, but rhythm and pacing keep action moving smartly.
April 7, 2006
The sort of production that could be performed on stage by a high-school student group.
April 6, 2006
Cheap-looking, amateurishly written, and badly acted...
Page 1 of 2