A Dangerous Method
2011, Drama/Mystery & thriller, 1h 39m
191 Reviews 25,000+ RatingsWhat to know
A provocative historical fiction about the early days of psychoanalysis, A Dangerous Method is buoyed by terrific performances by Michael Fassbender, Keira Knightley, and Viggo Mortensen. Read critic reviews
You might also like
See More
The Skin I Live In
Margin Call
Animal Kingdom
The House That Jack Built
Shame
Where to watch
Rate And Review
-
What did you think of the movie? (optional)
You're almost there! Just confirm how you got your ticket.
You're almost there! Just confirm how you got your ticket.
What did you think of the movie? (optional)
How did you buy your ticket?
-
Fandango
-
AMCTheatres.com or AMC AppNew
-
Cinemark Coming Soon
We won’t be able to verify your ticket today, but it’s great to know for the future.
-
Regal Coming Soon
We won’t be able to verify your ticket today, but it’s great to know for the future.
-
Theater box office or somewhere else
A Dangerous Method Photos
Movie Info
In 1904 a Russian woman named Sabina Spielrein (Keira Knightley) arrives at Carl Jung's (Michael Fassbender) clinic, seeking treatment for hysteria. Jung is eager to test Sigmund Freud's (Viggo Mortensen) theories on Sabina and, in fact, successfully treats her. Two years later Jung and Sabina meet Freud in person, and Jung takes over the treatment of Otto Gross, whose influence leads Jung to begin an affair with Sabina, contributing to a rift with Freud.
Cast & Crew
Keira Knightley
Sabina Spielrein
Sabina Spielrein
Viggo Mortensen
Sigmund Freud
Sigmund Freud
Michael Fassbender
Carl Jung
Carl Jung
Sarah Gadon
Emma Jung
Emma Jung
Vincent Cassel
Otto Gross
Otto Gross
André Hennicke
Professor Eugen Bleuler
Professor Eugen Bleuler
News & Interviews for A Dangerous Method
Critic Reviews for A Dangerous Method
Audience Reviews for A Dangerous Method
-
Nov 17, 2013"A Dangerous Method" is a really remarkable film. It tells the tale of the origins of psychoanalysis and the competition between its founder Sigmund Freud (here played by Viggo Mortensen) and Carl Jung (Michael Fassbender), who stood to inherit psychoanalysis and continue to promulgate the ideas, until Freud and Jung had a falling out. The film is quite historically accurate, according to the biographies and letters of both Freud and Jung. Viewers will also be impressed by Kiera Knightley's role as Sabina Spielrein. Highly recommended.Billie P Super Reviewer
-
Oct 08, 2013I'm with those who felt indifferent to this. Nothing awful to hate, but nothing to think wow, great movie. One off view was more than enough for me. Keira's acting is maybe slightly overdone at the beginning. I do like her, but not so much in this role. Overall movie is a little dry and dull for my taste the.Nicki M Super Reviewer
-
Jun 03, 2013The acting is above average, but not great. Even if the story is true, it's still uninspiring -- and frankly, I was bored. The costumes, hair and lighting were all high-quality.Christian C Super Reviewer
-
Jan 02, 2013Taking place in the decade leading up to WWI, this period piece/historical fiction is as standoffish and mannered as the era it represents. Director David Cronenberg does not fail to show us sexual fetishes, and the "madness" of Jung's patient Sabina Spielrein, but somehow it all comes off as sterile as a psychoanalysis session (although a beautifully filmed one). I was originally taken by the intellectual arguments between Jung and his hero/mentor Sigmund Freud, but by the end of the film it all seemed an overblown bit of psycho babble for me - all self important and really coming down to nothing special at all. I blame the script and direction for this, as really the performances, especially that of Vigo Mortenson as Freud, were top notch; even if Kiera Knighly's Spielrein seemed too bi-polar for my tastes and her mad mannerisms didn't seem to fit her illness. Taking into consideration that a fair part of the story involves Jung's dream of feeling trapped by his wife and children, this still didn't give Cronenberg license to rinse and repeat - 2 years later another child is born. Followed by a scene marked as "a year later in Vienna", followed by "a year later another.... You get the idea. I'm truly vexed over what could have been here - and I really wanted this film to shine; but in spite of the fascinating subject matter concerning these two titans of psychoanalysis I'm left feeling that there was so much more to be had here than the story presented, and more so, the way it was presented. I'm also not completely sold in Cronenberg's depiction of Jung as some kind of psychic channelor - able to reach into the great beyond for portents of upcoming events. To me this seemed like an easy way to explore the differences in Freud's practices and the theorums that Jung was to later expouse. Add that the great schism between the two minds held very little drama and the interplay between doctor and patient (who later became a doctor in her own right) lacked any sense of urgency or pathos and you get a film that, while interesting in part, overall suffered from too much navel contemplation.paul s Super Reviewer
Verified