Charlie Chan at Monte Carlo

Audience Reviews

View More

Patric N @RT91103425 Aug 7, 2026 The last in the series with Swedish Warner Oland in the role as Charlie Chan, who sadly passed away the year after. Entertaining movie (unless you are French and take offence of the fun they make of the French) with a mystery that was easier to solve than usual, by eliminating suspects. See more Ted B @Movieaddicted Feb 16, 2025 3.5 stars; As I have said throughout the Warner Oland series of Charlie Chan; this is a better series because of the emphasis on mystery and detective work, with no allegiance to the silly, slapstick, sophomoric humor between the number one son and Birmingham Brown. See more Russ G @RT78760655 May 26, 2024 Ah, 1930's / 40''s Hollywood B Pictures! As part of a double bill with coming attractions, short subjects, a travelogue, and a cartoon for 25c they transported a Depression-era or war-weary audience to exotic locales even if the film crew didn't venture off the back lot! Warner Oland is THE Charlie Chan; Sydney Toler is a imposter! This particular episode in the Chan series features another host of good supporting actors showing their range; this one has Harold Huber in another good performance. That guy could play anything! See more Feb 8, 2013 Tongue Can Hang Man Quicker Than Rope--R.I.P Warner Oland!! See more Oct 17, 2012 1.5: Hmm. I was prompted to watch these by an article in The New Yorker that I read a year or two ago. I wasn't expecting them to be outstanding, but I was expecting something better than this. I have now seen essentially every Charlie Chan film, or at least all that were made between 1931 and 1947 (29 films). What struck me most is that these really have more in common with a television show than a feature film. Each film is essentially the same except for the "location." I guess it makes sense as they serve essentially the same purpose. One can essentially watch every film on auto-pilot comfortable in the knowledge that one knows exactly which characters will pop up and that everything will be satisfactorily resolved in the end. They are "C" picture at best. Sidney Toler is pretty good; Warner Toland is somewhat acceptable; and the other two one picture no-names are either inconsequential or awful. It is rather ludicrous that they didn't allow an actual Asian actor to play the role, but the portrayal of African-American's is much more heinous. They certainly pale in comparison to just about every other detective picture/TV series I've ever seen. None of the films rate an individual review so this will have to suffice for all 29. See more Sep 21, 2011 Ah, the death of Netflix. Well, at least for me. So now I'm going back through my DVD collection, and it's an interesting trip down memory lane. <p> This particular Charlie Chan movie -- I own all of them that are available for purchase -- is an important one since it signals the last one made with Warner Oland in the the titular role. It took a good deal of searching to finally decide on Sidney Toler as the next Chan, and I believe he was a good choice. Still, there is no denying the chemistry between Oland and Keye Luke, nor the fact that if it weren't for the Chan series, Luke might never have had the career he did. <p>If you only watch two Charlie Chan movies, I strongly suggest that it be this one and the one immediately following, <i>Charlie Chan in Honolulu</i>, so you can compare the two best remembered actors to play the honorable detective. See more Read all reviews

Charlie Chan at Monte Carlo

My Rating

Read More Read Less WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW POST RATING