The LEGO Movie 2: The Second Part
The Walking Dead
Log in with Facebook
Forgot your password?
Don't have an account? Sign up here
and the Terms and Policies,
and to receive email from Rotten Tomatoes and Fandango.
Already have an account? Log in here
Please enter your email address and we will email you a new password.
We want to hear what you have to say but need to verify your account. Just leave us a message here and we will work on getting you verified.
Please reference “Error Code 2121” when contacting customer service.
No consensus yet.
Tomatometer Not Available...
No consensus yet.
All Critics (7)
| Top Critics (2)
| Fresh (3)
| Rotten (4)
| DVD (1)
This assemblage of Welles's footage by Jess Franco, from 1992, is crude, gappy, and slapdash, but it hardly matters: the pathos of Welles's thinly veiled self-portrait is almost unbearable.
[The] result is a travesty that will please no one, least of all Welles enthusiasts.
The film is an essay on Spain, and also an essay on Welles. Welles shared the Don's magniloquence, boundless self-esteem, ruinous generosity, romantic illusions and moral fervour.
[Jess] Franco's version is not even an approximation, never mind a reconstruction.... But even as a visual record of Welles' raw footage it's a travesty.
The least of Welles' features, but just as intriguing as his major works
Long-delayed reconstruction of Welles' unfinished Cervantes project.
Using guesswork and very little talent, a bunch of well-intentioned film buffs tried to piece together a lot of raw footage into something resembling the work of one of the greatest filmmakers of all time. They failed.
Yes, the film is a mess but it is an interesting mess. The actor playing Don Quixote certainly looks the part. Besides that, there are some nice shots but nothing complete, no unity. I would recommend it only to those who have read Don Quixote, love film, and can set their expectations lower.
This reconstruction of Orson Welles' unfinished "Don Quixote" didn't offend me quite as much as it offended some other Welles fans -- hey, at least his long-time girlfriend Oja Kodar is credited as a consultant.
Erratically filmed between 1955 and 1969 (mostly in 1957), this choppy footage has dialogue dubbed by contemporary actors -- and not very well. Beyond issues of artistic purity, this awkwardness is the film's worst handicap. It's also somewhat distasteful that the person who reads Welles' typically droll, witty narration is a calculated impersonator. But some interesting ideas emerge anyway. This is not your usual "Don Quixote" adaptation. Sure, it starts in a traditional way, but once Quixote and Sancho Panza reach the city, the story turns more surreal and self-reflexive. The time period turns out to be contemporary (surprise), yet Quixote and Panza are not informed about modern technology. Quixote's first delusional battle is with an evil motor scooter, and Panza spends a substantial, somewhat irritating amount of time asking people where to find the "noisy little box" (a television set) that he happened upon earlier. But this world recognizes Quixote and Panza and, furthermore, famous director Orson Welles is in town shooting a version of their story and just might need them for the lead roles. (Apparently, some of the Welles material is little more than home movies of Spain shot for an unrelated travelogue documentary.) Another interesting quirk is that the Welles-like narrator occasionally breaks convention and directly speaks with Panza.
Director Jesus Franco (who worked on Welles' "Chimes at Midnight") is responsible for this assemblage, for better or worse. He pieced together his own version of the famous windmill-tilting scene (Welles had a different idea for the sequence that went unrealized), and possibly went against Welles' wishes in using the legendary director as an onscreen presence.
"Don Quixote" has little of the distinctive camera angles and lighting that one might expect from an Orson Welles project, but it should intrigue film buffs despite its dubious credibility.
"Orson Welles' Don Quixote" is a trippy and playful adaptation of the venerable novel that starts pretty much as expected. Don Quixote(Francisco Reiguera) is an aging landowner who decides, after a copious amount of reading of romantic adventures, to don an ancient set of armor and to have a series of (mis)adventures with Sancho Panza(Akim Tamiroff), a peasant friend, as his squire much to his perpetual consternation, in search of his beloved Dulcinea and giant windmills to battle. As austere as the budget seems to be, at least they could afford horses and the windmill sequence is captured with imagination. What sets this version apart and is the most jarring detail is its being set in the present day as Quixote brutally attacks a Vespa.(If he only waited a few decades, he would have found a much more deserving target in an SUV.) The time is important because after a while Orson Welles takes the story away from the book as Sancho Panza finds himself acting in a movie called "Don Quixote" by Orson Welles. It is evident that Don Quixote, who lives in a land that is better than the real one was, appeals to the dreamer in all of us, especially Welles. Contrary to this theory is an extended sequence revolving around a bullfight, which indicates he might have been more interested in filming the people of Spain than its classic literature which not counting Terry Gilliam might disprove the rumor of a curse being associated with films of "Don Quixote," as this was not the only incomplete work Welles left behind.(This was finished after his death.) On the other hand, "Farscape" was canceled shortly after its own take on "Don Quixote." So what do I know?
An oddity, an uneven pastiche of stock footage of Welles himself and bits and pieces of his unfinished film. it has some few funny moments.
There are no approved quotes yet for this movie.