Entrance

Critics Consensus

No consensus yet.

80%

TOMATOMETER

Total Count: 5

46%

Audience Score

User Ratings: 217

Where to watch

Rate And Review

User image

Verified

  • User image

    Super Reviewer

    Rate this movie

    Oof, that was Rotten.

    Meh, it passed the time.

    It’s good – I’d recommend it.

    Awesome!

    So Fresh: Absolute Must See!

    What did you think of the movie? (optional)



  • You're almost there! Just confirm how you got your ticket.

  • User image

    Super Reviewer

    Step 2 of 2

    How did you buy your ticket?

    Let's get your review verified.

    • Fandango

    • AMCTheatres.com or AMC AppNew

    • Cinemark Coming Soon

      We won’t be able to verify your ticket today, but it’s great to know for the future.

    • Regal Coming Soon

      We won’t be able to verify your ticket today, but it’s great to know for the future.

    • Theater box office or somewhere else

    You're almost there! Just confirm how you got your ticket.

  • User image

    Super Reviewer

    Rate this movie

    Oof, that was Rotten.

    Meh, it passed the time.

    It’s good – I’d recommend it.

    Awesome!

    So Fresh: Absolute Must See!

    What did you think of the movie? (optional)

  • How did you buy your ticket?

    • Fandango

    • AMCTheatres.com or AMC AppNew

    • Cinemark Coming Soon

      We won’t be able to verify your ticket today, but it’s great to know for the future.

    • Regal Coming Soon

      We won’t be able to verify your ticket today, but it’s great to know for the future.

    • Theater box office or somewhere else

Entrance Photos

Movie Info

Things lurking on the periphery of people's lives lead to horrific conclusions.

Cast & Crew

Critic Reviews for Entrance

All Critics (5) | Fresh (4) | Rotten (1)

Audience Reviews for Entrance

  • Aug 31, 2013
    This film is pretty much dangerously slow for the first hour or so. Slow to the point that there were several occasions where I felt like stopping it. I do think the movie does a very good job at showcasing Suzy's anxiety and how she's simply not adjusting well to life in Los Angeles and the only thing keeping her there is her dog. The movie is also psychological in the sense that Suzy always feels like there's something or someone out to get her. So there is a sense of dread there, at least in some scenes, where someone's presence is implied by the use of noise. But I don't think the movie really sustains this tension because there comes a point in the movie, probably when Suzy decides to leave, that it just stops until the 1 hour mark. And this brings us to the climax of the movie, where the movie becomes a nasty little home invasion movie. And the thing is, you could watch this entire movie without thinking, at any moment, that this home invasion angle could come as a huge surprise to you. I think that's a positive, because it does add a surprising element to the film, a film that had been psychological more than anything else. I thought the last 20 minutes or so of the movie were very well done, pretty much the home invasion is everything it needed to be. It was bleak and disturbing, because you're not even sure who this man is or why he's doing what he's doing. He explains that he has been watching Suzy for a long time, but there's a senselessness to the crime that makes it even more disturbing. But the problem is that I don't think the movie has enough interesting material to go as long as it does. Yea, the movie is just 80 minutes long, not counting the credits. It does build up tension in some scenes very well but it is not sustained, the movie, for the most part, just feels aimless. You're not sure why you're even watching for the most part. And that's really a problem. Does the last act make the entire movie worth sitting through? I don't know. For some people, yes. For me? I'm not really so sure, it does make the movie a lot better, but I can't say it makes everything leading up to it better. It just doesn't. That's not to say everything leading up to the climax was bad, it was just a chore to get through. But I still think this movie is average at best. It's got a really slow build to a great climax. Shave 20 minutes off this film and I'd say this was a good movie.
    Jesse O Super Reviewer
  • Jun 19, 2013
    Listen. Whenever a couple of slasher horror enthusiasts get inspired by the likes of Cloverfield (2008) and the mood of Rachel Getting Married (2008) with a school break lunch budget, you get this. The intentions are not that bad, nor the original influences. I have always believed that one of the multiple ways in which you can create horror is creating in the audience a certain familiarity with the situations that are shown and, if possible, building empathy towards the main characters. The film fails miserably in the latter, but succeeds in the first thing skillfully, considering its budget. One gotta be brave with this kind of films. Cinema connoisseurs will never get close to them and mainstream audiences will bash them, so here I am, as a modest vote of confidence. What a bad luck for a couple of newcomers attempting to make a decent film. It is not a good movie, but it reached the quality of your typical gore-oriented Hollywood garbage of today without using certain amounts of gore, and it surpassed any Eli Roth / Steve Beck flicks. Props for the endless (20-minute split in two) tracking shot which actually compiled all of the horror found in the feature. The terror we felt during those last minutes happened thanks to the first hour! 47/100
    Edgar C Super Reviewer
  • Sep 16, 2012
    Extremely slow burn. Good ending but not sure if the first 60 minutes was even worth that ending.
    Leina R Super Reviewer

Entrance Quotes

There are no approved quotes yet for this movie.

Movie & TV guides