Meek's Cutoff

Meek's Cutoff Photos

View All Photos (18)

Cast & Crew

Michelle Williams
Emily Tetherow

Bruce Greenwood
Stephen Meek

Will Patton
Solomon Tetherow

Zoe Kazan
Millie Gately

Paul Dano
Thomas Gately

Shirley Henderson
Glory White

Neal Huff
William White

Tommy Nelson
Jimmy White

Rod Rondeaux
The Cayuse

Kelly Reichardt
Director

Neil Kopp
Producer

Anish Savjani
Producer

Elizabeth Cuthrell
Producer

David Urrutia
Producer

Kelly Reichardt
Film Editor

David Doernberg
Production Design

Jonathan Raymond
Screenwriter

Show all Cast & Crew

Critic Reviews for Meek's Cutoff

Audience Reviews for Meek's Cutoff

• Mar 22, 2016

  Not even for Zoe Kazan. Wow, what a dull movie. I managed about 20 minutes before I'd had enough.
  Nicki M Super Reviewer
• Feb 12, 2014

  Never send a man to do a woman's job, or he'll bring "destruction" to the western formula (I am thinking violence, bullets and action stars) instead of the "chaotic" perspective of a woman's contemplative persona, which is described in the following paragraphs. Kelly Reichhardt's absolutely breathtaking and meditative take on the earliest days of the Oregon Trail set in 1845 is a slow-paced, compelling essay on fear, trust, prejudice, and the human instincts and inner demons that flourish to the surface when mankind faces uncertainty and is compelled to witness mortality face to face. Surprisingly filmed with a 1.33 : 1 ratio, a rare artistic decision taken also by extremely underrated filmmaker Andrea Arnold (think of her equally underrated masterpiece <i>Wuthering Heights</i> [2011]), the screen is filled to its top capacity to showcase spectacular imagery of desolate landscapes, inert in essence, but that mirror the character's psychological state, and in that sense they become significantly alive. This ratio, along with the cinematography, almost perfectly correlates with the film's intentions, and takes us back to the classic days of bringing the images to an equilibrium so that the eye does not hesitate away from the minimalist action, "action" meaning the meaningful events in this absorbing and almost existentialist pioneer journey. Suitable for those seeking to venture into the nowadays challenging celluloid contributions of independent women, <i>Meek's Cutoff</i> is hundreds of miles ahead of the Coen's boring and overrated western remake (now that's the definition of boredom!). A film that received attention at the Venice Film Festival, it provides enough strong and even allegoric emotional material (towards the ending), and stands for the overwhelming power that non-narrative cinema can acquire in the patient and open-minded viewer not awaiting for everything to be described, explained or spoon-fed for the sake of simplicity and straightforwardness. Among the best U.S. films (if not the best) of 2010. 87/100
  Edgar C Super Reviewer
• Feb 13, 2013

  Here's the thing with Meek's Cutoff; it's a movie that isn't going to appeal to a large audience and probably not even a small one to be honest. It's a movie that moves slow in the beginning, slower in the middle, and slow at the end. Oh, and then there's the whole no real beginning, no real end thing that pissed a lot of people off.  I for one got a good amount of enjoyment from watching Kelly Reichardt's Meek's Cutoff. It has such beautiful cinematography. Every single shot of this film is what you'd call art. It's been a while since I was so blown away by the pure beauty that is every single shot of this film. So it looks great and that does mean a lot to me. I also loved Michelle Williams, as always. Every time I watch her in another movie, I end up loving her more than I did before. Bruce Greenwood is also good and Paul Dano has a role, but he's nothing too special in it.  Meek's Cutoff follows a couple of families as they follow a man named Meek who promised them he could get them to the mountains quicker then the trail. He took a shortcut, but it seems like anything but a shortcut. The movie begins with the families crossing a river and collecting water. The scene goes on for quite awhile and at first I wondered why, but it was extremely apparent as the film moved on. They find themselves without much water and Meek isn't able to bring them to any. So now some of them are questioning Meek. Then a Native American shows up around them, so they capture him and try to make him show them to the water.  There's a lot in this film that would and obviously has put off audiences. It's slow, it's quiet, and it doesn't really lead us anywhere. Well that's the point. We're kind of put into the same situation as the people in the move. We're being lead around a film, but are we going to get anywhere? Their being led around the wilderness, but will they get anywhere? I'm not going to say this is a masterpiece or anything, although visually it is. I'm not going to say I loved it, but it will make me watch Kelly Reichardt's other films and the ones she does in the future. Look, I'm not going to recommend this because I just don't think there's a lot of people who would like it. I liked it, but I don't speak for majority of people.
  Melvin W Super Reviewer
• Jan 23, 2013

  There are scenes in this 2010 "western" that make watching paint dry seem like an adrenaline ride, however, there is a stark beauty to behold, and all the contemplative slowness does immerse you in the pioneer experience - for imagine what traveling cross country in a covered wagon, doing 10 miles a day would have been like. There are huge expanses of "nothin'" in eastern Oregon - plains and playas where the nearest mountain is 40 or 50 miles away... in other words, you have to traverse the same barren moonscape for 4 to 5 days just to get there! I'm sure that it would never appear that the mountains are getting any closer. I've been through the area around Burns, Oregon where this was filmed (there are wild horses to be photographed in the area - as well as lots of petroglyphs and dinosaur footprints) and was sure glad I had a vehicle that was capable of 70mph, for some of the vistas indeed did seem endless. What director Kelly Reichardt shows us is that boredom and stark realism. For much of the film no-one says much and not much happens - just the 3 covered wagons being led across the vast wilderness - well filmed with one long shot dissolving into another, day after day after day. Soon, from the sparse dialog you get the picture - this group of 3 east coast families (who going in don't know each other at all), hire Steven Meeks as a guide to get them into the promised land (in this case the beautiful and bountiful Willamette Valley). Meeks is full of tall tales and it becomes apparent that he really is more bluster than real, and he has gotten the group hopelessly lost. When a curious Indian begins following the group, the defacto group leader (solidly played by Will Patton) convinces Meeks and the others to capture the Indian in the hopes that he can lead them to water. What transpires thereafter deals with trust, fear, and prejudice while the tension slowly mounts over whether the group will find water and survive. Along the way there is a solid minimalist performance of Michelle Williams and a nice turn by Bruce Greenwood as the blowhard Meeks to go with the vast vistas of nothingness. At an hour and 45 minutes, the film does waste considerable screen time on said nothingness, both scenery wise and in terms of script. When faced with having to lower the wagons down a steep slope via rope one at a time I question whether it was really necessary for Reichardt to show the descent of all three. It's this kind of questionable directorial decision that makes the film a nice contemplation on a time and place, but ultimately a flawed piece of cinema.
  paul s Super Reviewer

Quotes

Movie & TV guides