Mary Poppins Returns
Log in with Facebook
Forgot your password?
Don't have an account? Sign up here
and the Terms and Policies,
and to receive email from Rotten Tomatoes and Fandango.
Already have an account? Log in here
Please enter your email address and we will email you a new password.
No consensus yet.
Tomatometer Not Available...
No consensus yet.
All Critics (5)
| Top Critics (2)
| Fresh (3)
| Rotten (2)
Adams' succinct complaint about animal exploitation is reduced to a mute whine.
The Plague Dogs makes such skillful use of computer animation that its principal characters develop an amazing doggy authenticity.
Harrowing in story and urgent in subject, dealing with animal rights and the relation of human beings to their planet.
The animation is better than average but not outstanding, and the script is simplistic.
The whole movie is shot through with despair and dread; it feels like a prolonged howl of helplessness.
Martin Rosen goes unrecognized in the realm of filmmaking. He might have only directed and written two films, but finding any other animated film to compare "Watership Down" and "The Plague Dogs" to is nearly impossible. Rosen was an important pioneer in animation not only taking bold risks in his imagery, but narratively constructing and discussing subjects its genre is afraid to acknowledge. "The Plague Dogs" (just like "Watership Down") is an important animated film that pushed it genre to show what it can pull off with no boundaries.
The Plague Dogs follows dogs Rowf and Snitter that escape from a laboratory and are hunted as possible carriers of the bubonic plague. Opening with a Dog struggling to stay afloat in a test chamber setups the film tone and past this opening it holds nothing back. The dogs whose journey we experience have the mannerism of actual dogs. Inexperienced and loyal to each other the dogs are unsure of the world, forced to reach deep inside to become survivals in harsh conditions, and discussing opposing views of a "master". Snitter whose ideal of a master is one treated with respects as his companion while Rowf opposing view is one of cruelty serving nothing more than a tool for the "master". There is truth be found in both characters despite being different species have regrets, dreams, tackling the harsh reality as best they can. They don't have all the answers with their journey never guaranteeing they'll be safe. Despite spouting English dialogue the dogs are never removed from reality. Characterizations of the animals are created with human characteristics, but through the viewpoints that makes sense through an animal; Rowf is a realist who thinks the world is cruel and there is no hope for a better life. Snitter is an optimist who, even under the worst conditions, is convinced that a master and a warm home is always just over the hill. The Tod, a fox who helps Snitter and Rowf find food, is an absolute opportunist. These thoughts make sense in nature staying true to survival of the fittest among the common living creature.
It's not so much a film on the cruelty of animal testing, but the cruelty of the world. Doing so without asking us to leave out our personal lives in order for its aesthetic to ring true. Never does it hammer the question if animal testing is inhumane rather focusing on the more important if the cause of the action or action itself is more inhumane. It is worth eliminating another creature livelihood for our own purposes. The human point of view is given through conversations between farmers, townsfolk and researchers, which, along with some media reports, are all presented as voice overs as we watch the dogs do whatever they're doing. For the most part, humans are kept as faceless, omnipresent entities. Having all the pieces connected it comes towards the ending. An ending that embodies the best in characters, emotions, and thought provoking mood that can bring tears to anyone. This tearful ending is earned made all the more powerful by our connections to our protagonists that will remain with the audience long after it ended.
Martin Rosen often depicts the protagonists as little more than tiny blips against the countryside, simultaneously taking in the grandeur of the rocky gorges and grassy hillsides while emphasizing a sense of helplessness, exposure and danger. The attention to detail in the backdrops provides the aura of realism and regional specificity. Integration is accomplished by the way of dynamic characters with static backgrounds. Footprints and impressions left in the snow are particularly notable. Another coup for Rosen's team is the animal movement. They behave accurately like an animal from their rhythmic strides and subtle panting to their curious sniffing and twitchy shifts in attention. Rosen moves over these images with a camera that pans and tilts with relaxed reverence. He reserves canted shots for the laboratory interior to show the way it twists nature and brings life out of balance. On a few occasions his winding camera movements help put us on the meandering paths that trickle down the moors, though such unusual maneuvers must have made it hard to get the perspective and proportions right. Cast of characters is relatively small; for most of the movie, it's just the two dogs and the fox, with additional dogs or humans popping up when they're needed. Christopher Benjamin does an excellent job as Rowf, sounding hardened by years of torture, while as Snitter, John Hurt sounds appropriately frail and delirious. James Bolam is charming as The Tod, and brings a little bit of welcome humor to the grim tone film. Nigel Hawthorne and Patrick Stewart have small roles as a doctor and soldier, respectively. Patrick Gleeson's score is suitably moody, while Alan Parsons provides the song "Time and Tide." Although it sounds melancholy at the beginning, its gospel chorus is surprisingly upbeat, suggesting that there may be a little light at the end of the tunnel after all.
The Plague Dogs is a masterpiece incomparable to any other in its genre. Its grim color palette and harrowing story never once remove the idea of hope. Very few animated films look, feel, and tackle the issues "The Plague Dogs" does and even fewer can compared to it. Not taking the safe route "The Plague Dogs" displays tragedy in mature work of art where by the end have you thinking of the beauty of it all.
I was unable to obtain the specifics of what he input into the film, but director Brad Bird was listed in the credits as an animator. Visually and in tone the two couldn't be further apart, yet when it comes to their stories it's rather difficult to pick who's the better storyteller as both have pushed their narrative beyond what its genre restraint them to.
Perhaps the bleakest and yet most moving animated film I have ever seen. The animation is simple but perfect, and the story is mature and overwhelming. the uneasyness, impotence and sadness stays with you long after the credits have rolled.
From the director and author of Watership Down comes this delightfully British and morbidly depressing animation. Us Brits even make our cartoons miserable. This is not for kids but it also isn't strictly for adults. It deals with dark themes including animal testing, mental illness and generally depicts humans as the cruel bastards we are. The animation is beautiful, capturing the wonderful countryside in a subtle and grim fashion. The vocal talents on display are also a marvelous bunch, each actor giving a performance as serious as any of their live-action work. This film is very brutal in places and has some of the most shocking imagery in any film.
From the makers of cult classic animated movie "Watership Down" and if you liked (or let's say know) the first one you will love this one. Based on Richard Adams anthropomorphical novel starring two talking dogs which escape from a grizzly research labratory. From then on, they roam the countryside in seach of food, a new master, friends and a way to escape the cruelty of this world ridden with sadistic humans.
The movie is very dystopian, set in the rainy, dark and rainy landscape of some Irish/Scottish/British highland area. So do not expect Disney-like backdrops or cute little sidekicks, but grim old dogs and even some gore (yes, kill those sheep !).
The movie is one long attack on animal cruelty and the cold heartedness of humans, terrible things is, as much as this movie overstresses the badness of humankind, it is pretty much right and you can just sit there, nodding in ashamed agreement.
Anyway, the movie is a nice detour of all (and I mean all) classic animation movie you have ever seen, and is definetely not for children. If you are interested in animation, animals or both, give this a go. It is one for the obscurity cabinet in your collection for sure.
There are no approved quotes yet for this movie.