Sons of Liberty: Season 1 (2015)

Season 1
Sons of Liberty

Critics Consensus

Sons of Liberty's action and sex titillate, but not enough to compensate for the show's bland, historically inaccurate story.



Critic Ratings: 12

Audience Score

User Ratings: 0
User image


Air date: Jan 25, 2015
Air date: Jan 26, 2015
Air date: Jan 26, 2015
Air date: Jan 26, 2015
Air date: Jan 27, 2015
Air date: Jan 27, 2015

Sons of Liberty: Season 1 Photos

Tv Season Info


Ben Barnes
as Samuel Adams
Ryan Eggold
as Dr. Joseph Warren
Rafe Spall
as John Hancock
Marton Csokas
as Gen. Thomas Gage
Emily Berrington
as Margaret Gage
Jason O'Mara
as Gen. George Washington
Dean Norris
as Benjamin Franklin
Show More Cast

News & Interviews for Sons of Liberty: Season 1

Critic Reviews for Sons of Liberty Season 1

All Critics (12) | Top Critics (8)

Sons of Liberty rips the powdered wigs off America's founding fathers. In a good way.

Jan 23, 2015 | Rating: 4/5 | Full Review…

Certainly a cut above boilerplate, this good production plays to our idealized conception of what happened.

Jan 23, 2015 | Rating: B- | Full Review…
Top Critic

History probably could have drawn just as big an audience with Sam Adams: Vampire Hunter.

Jan 23, 2015 | Full Review…
Top Critic

Sons of Liberty can't match Vikings' intensity, ferocity and full-immersion sense of place. Instead it's a serviceable battle cry in some instances but rather laughable in others.

Jan 22, 2015 | Rating: C+ | Full Review…
Top Critic

While some purists may object to the miniseries sexing things up, executive producer and writer Stephen David should be commended for not venerating these larger-than-life figures but making them relatable.

Jan 28, 2015 | Rating: B | Full Review…

You'll feel the drama unfold more viscerally if you aren't a history buff.

Jan 27, 2015 | Full Review…

The writing in Sons of Liberty is as watered-down as the tea in Boston Harbor in 1773.

Jan 26, 2015 | Full Review…

For a production featuring powdered wigs, Sons of Liberty does a particularly good job of introducing its large cast of characters and making them distinct.

Jan 23, 2015 | Full Review…

Low on rigorous scholarship, history on History is high on blood-splatter and anachronistically modern sexuality. While this can be great fun in fictionalized shows... it becomes problematic when the time period is better known to its audience.

Jan 27, 2015 | Full Review…

Sons Of Liberty's draw is the battlefield, not the bedroom, and the scenes set there are certainly worth tuning in for.

Jan 26, 2015 | Rating: B- | Full Review…
Top Critic

Audience Reviews for Sons of Liberty: Season 1

  • Aug 17, 2015
    I never liked history in school, but that could be because it was never on the parts of history or particular cultures I was interested in. (Egyptians, Vikings & the Norse Greek & Norse Mythology etc) When the Tudors came out I was mad we didn't have the Showtime channel. All I have to say is if there is any truth to the show of actual events, then why couldn't we have had this while I was in school (not that they covered that) Now the History Channel has Vikings going into it's 3rd season February 19th and it's a great show. So what would History do with our founding fathers? Well I watched it in support for one of my favorite actors... Kevin Ryan who played Maguire on the BBC America show (of 2 seasons) Copper. Sons of Liberty is a 6 hour mini-series starring Ben Barnes (yeah Prince Caspian of the Narnia Movie) as Samuel Adams and every time I hear the name I wanted to drink my beer (but my Octoberfest beer is reserved for the new season of Vikings! I should have drank it during one 2 hour episodes. Kevin Ryan played a Red Coat John Pitcairn @Michael Raymond James who played Neil on Once upon a Time and the red head's husband Rene on True Blood & was in 2 episodes of The Walking Dead as Dave (when Hershel & Rick are in that bar) Marton Csokas as Britain's General (is it just me or does this guy always play a D*Bag?) and Benjamin Franklin... played by 'Big Jim' Dean Norris from Under the Dome. So there's plenty of great actors What about the show itself? I do remember learning about the Constitution & Preamble etc in I think grade school I don't remember if I cared but if not; I would say to definitely have shown this mini series if you are working on the founding fathers. Your students will likely not be bored. The action is great, and even when there is none- they still won't doze off! I like the grief they gave the General and the underground market they ran. (remember people NEVER make anything solid as a means for identifying someone for a secret group, however , if you were to do something make it invisible ink! just keep a specific mark or something on it so you know what it is) A Another Hit for the History Channel * of Liberty
  • Mar 12, 2015
    Made with good intention, but ultimately failed to be engaging because of the historical inaccuracy and dreadful acting.
    Sylvester K Super Reviewer
  • Sep 14, 2017
    Earthier version of the struggle for American independence.
  • Nov 08, 2015
    Although the acting and costuming is good, the history behind this series is so flawed it makes me want to puke. With the cast and the special effects, this COULD have been superb but the liberties they took with the history of the period make 'The Patriot' look good by comparison.
  • Jun 02, 2015
    These should be shown in every history class in this country.
  • Mar 22, 2015
    Really great series!
  • Mar 06, 2015
    I gave a star for the actors, but otherwise, what a horror! When you make up fiction about historical periods don't use actual figures as main characters. Their history is ridiculous.
  • Mar 03, 2015
    I wish our founding fathers had been so cool. It tried too hard and most of the story, at least too me was too over the top.
  • Feb 24, 2015
    Well done. Kept my interest
  • Feb 19, 2015
    Is it corny and over glammed? Yes. Dramatic with a historical twist? Completely. BUT. This series is actually pretty accurate information-wise. I was entertained AND intrigued about the relationship between the colonists and Brits at the time. Hopefully it gets more people interested in their country's history.

News & Features